> Heinz I understand the problem and money is most certainly a factor for
> many. It is not easy to shell out $1150 for new alcoas and than another
> $1000 for tires. But I have to wonder how many years this problem existed
> simply because people were not aware of the problem. for instance the
tires
> on my coach were over 10 years old, and I did not know it until one of
them
> blew out.
That is indeed and ouch. Perhaps that may be partially how I've been "lucky"
enough not have problems in all my miles and years. I don't think I've ever
had a tire older than 3 or 4 years.
>
> Now because of this net, we have information available almost instantly.
In
> the last year I have made it a point when seeing new GMC motorhomes to
look
> at the tires. I am amazed at how many of them have old tires with little
> tread, checked sidewalls, and looking underinflated.
That is the very unfortunate part and you're right that the net is helping
to make people aware, especially new prospective owners so that they can
negotiate better and more informed... and hence be a safer GMC'er.
>
> I hope that we have learned that no matter what tire you select, after 3-5
> years, replace them.
I guess this is were my ignorance shows once again... I always thought this
to be the case
Heinz
>
>
>
>
> >Tom.
> >I don't think anyone is realy worried about 20 bucks to go to E's at next
> >tire change, it's the decision and cost as to when to do that tire change
> >that's causing us to question as to when the right time is. That's the
boa
> >constrictor some of us have to deal with and sometimes a straw is all we
> >have
> >
> >That's the dilema that I am (was) at but I decided to forego my
marguarita
> >allowance on the next couple of trips. Going to pick up my Michelins on
> >Monday. Of course they won't get put on until next trip as Alcoa
replacments
> >are still 5 weeks away.
> >
> >The unfortunate part is that every D tire failure will be attributed to
the
> >fact of it simply being D. I firmly believe that the reason we don't hear
of
> >many E failures is simply because there are not as many "old" ones out
there
> >compared to the number of D's out there. What are we going to blame when
> >the E's start to get old and get used to beyond what they should be in
time,
> >etc. and start to blow?
> >
> >Heinz
> >
> >
> >> Trying to kill this tire myth is like trying to kill a boa constrictor
> >with
> >> a straw. We are talkin about approx $20 per tire to change from D rated
> >> tires to all steel E rated ones. If there is even the slightest chance
of
> >> Wes Caulan being right can you really afford to not take his advice? I
> >will
> >> spend $120 any day to avoid a blowout or worse. Wait until you get the
> >bill
> >> for the coach repairs if you ever have a blow out.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Here is what Wes said:
> >> "In the early 1980's GM replaced all of its original equipment
> >> polyester-casing load range D tires with Michelin All-steel load range
E
> >> RADIAL tires. It was not in the 1970's."
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> >> Then if my logic is logical, why haven't the owners of '73 & '74
models
> >> >> received a recall from GM to replace those non-radial wheels which
> >won't
> >> >> hold
> >> >> up under the stress of the required radial tires?? I missed out on
the
> >> >tire
> >> >> recall, having ditched my Generals and bought Michelins with my own
> >money,
> >> >> and now I've replaced their defective wheels.
> >> >
> >> >Lanier,
> >> > IIRC, the "D" => "E" tire recall involved installing steel-belted
BIAS
> >PLY
> >> >load-range E tires, not radials. (Probably not steel-sidewalls
either,
> >> >FWIW.) In fact one early recall was to install little stickers
reminding
> >> >everyone NOT to mount radials. My '75 has such a sticker in the
> >glovebox.
> >> >So, basically, radial tires were never "required".
> >> >
> >> > It was not until late '75 that radial-ready wheels were used, and
some
> >> >time after THAT, that GM "reluctantly" (Wes Coughlin's words)
installed
> >> >radial tires. Incidentally, one bulletin I have admonishes the
dealers
> >that
> >> >unless the customer uses the lone approved Generel "steel-belted" (not
> >> >all-steel) radial tire, GM would disavow any complaints of harsh ride,
> >poor
> >> >tracking (wiggle), or the like.
> >> >
> >> > As late as 1990, Wes Coughlin, while advocating all-steel radial
> >tires,
> >> >was advising a questioner to go find some bias-ply tires if he really
> >wanted
> >> >to eliminate the tendency to follow the grooves in the highway. (cf:
> >"Coach
> >> >Talk", Sept. 1990, published in the GMC Western States' newsletter,
pp.
> >3-4)
> >> >
> >> > Having thrown my cup of gasoline on the flames, I retire to my
> >fortified
> >> >keyboard to watch the second act of "Tire Wars".
> >> >;-)
> >> >
> >> >Rick Staples
> >> >'75 Eleganza
> >> >Louisville, CO
> >> >
> >> >
> >> Tom & Marg Warner
> >> Vernon Center NY
> >> 1976 palmbeach
> >> "The beautiful Mohawk Vally"
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> Tom & Marg Warner
> Vernon Center NY
> 1976 palmbeach
> "The beautiful Mohawk Vally"
>
>
> many. It is not easy to shell out $1150 for new alcoas and than another
> $1000 for tires. But I have to wonder how many years this problem existed
> simply because people were not aware of the problem. for instance the
tires
> on my coach were over 10 years old, and I did not know it until one of
them
> blew out.
That is indeed and ouch. Perhaps that may be partially how I've been "lucky"
enough not have problems in all my miles and years. I don't think I've ever
had a tire older than 3 or 4 years.
>
> Now because of this net, we have information available almost instantly.
In
> the last year I have made it a point when seeing new GMC motorhomes to
look
> at the tires. I am amazed at how many of them have old tires with little
> tread, checked sidewalls, and looking underinflated.
That is the very unfortunate part and you're right that the net is helping
to make people aware, especially new prospective owners so that they can
negotiate better and more informed... and hence be a safer GMC'er.
>
> I hope that we have learned that no matter what tire you select, after 3-5
> years, replace them.
I guess this is were my ignorance shows once again... I always thought this
to be the case
Heinz
>
>
>
>
> >Tom.
> >I don't think anyone is realy worried about 20 bucks to go to E's at next
> >tire change, it's the decision and cost as to when to do that tire change
> >that's causing us to question as to when the right time is. That's the
boa
> >constrictor some of us have to deal with and sometimes a straw is all we
> >have
> >
> >That's the dilema that I am (was) at but I decided to forego my
marguarita
> >allowance on the next couple of trips. Going to pick up my Michelins on
> >Monday. Of course they won't get put on until next trip as Alcoa
replacments
> >are still 5 weeks away.
> >
> >The unfortunate part is that every D tire failure will be attributed to
the
> >fact of it simply being D. I firmly believe that the reason we don't hear
of
> >many E failures is simply because there are not as many "old" ones out
there
> >compared to the number of D's out there. What are we going to blame when
> >the E's start to get old and get used to beyond what they should be in
time,
> >etc. and start to blow?
> >
> >Heinz
> >
> >
> >> Trying to kill this tire myth is like trying to kill a boa constrictor
> >with
> >> a straw. We are talkin about approx $20 per tire to change from D rated
> >> tires to all steel E rated ones. If there is even the slightest chance
of
> >> Wes Caulan being right can you really afford to not take his advice? I
> >will
> >> spend $120 any day to avoid a blowout or worse. Wait until you get the
> >bill
> >> for the coach repairs if you ever have a blow out.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Here is what Wes said:
> >> "In the early 1980's GM replaced all of its original equipment
> >> polyester-casing load range D tires with Michelin All-steel load range
E
> >> RADIAL tires. It was not in the 1970's."
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> >> Then if my logic is logical, why haven't the owners of '73 & '74
models
> >> >> received a recall from GM to replace those non-radial wheels which
> >won't
> >> >> hold
> >> >> up under the stress of the required radial tires?? I missed out on
the
> >> >tire
> >> >> recall, having ditched my Generals and bought Michelins with my own
> >money,
> >> >> and now I've replaced their defective wheels.
> >> >
> >> >Lanier,
> >> > IIRC, the "D" => "E" tire recall involved installing steel-belted
BIAS
> >PLY
> >> >load-range E tires, not radials. (Probably not steel-sidewalls
either,
> >> >FWIW.) In fact one early recall was to install little stickers
reminding
> >> >everyone NOT to mount radials. My '75 has such a sticker in the
> >glovebox.
> >> >So, basically, radial tires were never "required".
> >> >
> >> > It was not until late '75 that radial-ready wheels were used, and
some
> >> >time after THAT, that GM "reluctantly" (Wes Coughlin's words)
installed
> >> >radial tires. Incidentally, one bulletin I have admonishes the
dealers
> >that
> >> >unless the customer uses the lone approved Generel "steel-belted" (not
> >> >all-steel) radial tire, GM would disavow any complaints of harsh ride,
> >poor
> >> >tracking (wiggle), or the like.
> >> >
> >> > As late as 1990, Wes Coughlin, while advocating all-steel radial
> >tires,
> >> >was advising a questioner to go find some bias-ply tires if he really
> >wanted
> >> >to eliminate the tendency to follow the grooves in the highway. (cf:
> >"Coach
> >> >Talk", Sept. 1990, published in the GMC Western States' newsletter,
pp.
> >3-4)
> >> >
> >> > Having thrown my cup of gasoline on the flames, I retire to my
> >fortified
> >> >keyboard to watch the second act of "Tire Wars".
> >> >;-)
> >> >
> >> >Rick Staples
> >> >'75 Eleganza
> >> >Louisville, CO
> >> >
> >> >
> >> Tom & Marg Warner
> >> Vernon Center NY
> >> 1976 palmbeach
> >> "The beautiful Mohawk Vally"
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> Tom & Marg Warner
> Vernon Center NY
> 1976 palmbeach
> "The beautiful Mohawk Vally"
>
>