Personally, at this point I don't trust steer and brake by wire - no problem with electric power assists and whatever variable logic might prove beneficial, but definitely want "fail to manual" systems.I've contacted RƎE Automotive about a collaboration on my proposed GMC Motorhome EV RestoMod, employing their modular RƎEcorner alternative to the various motor in-wheel systems I'm researching in parallel, for example a relatively new leader out of Germany, DeepDrive Tech.
View attachment 12561
Here's a technical brief and walk-thru video with Peter Dow, VP of Engineering.
I drove professionally as a youngster, and to increase range, my thought is to borrow a page from the semi-truck handbook, that is to take advantage of the new suspension and drive to lift one set of bogie tires while cruising.
If RƎE Automotive isn't interested in collaboration, my course would then be to proceed with the in-wheel design or feasible to adopt their basic drivetrain architecture using the venerable “Industrial Lego” method made possible by RƎE Automotive's use of many industry standard components.
A no-lag drive by wire system would be fine - fail to idle or zero rpm is a major inconvenience but not as inherently life threatening as coming downhill with no connection to brakes and/or steering.
Pusher and tag axles are used on heavy trucks to stay within bridge load ratings with varying loads. For all practical purposes, RV GVW and axle loading is pretty constant - either the GMC needs four tires to support the rear end loads or it doesn't. If it doesn't, remove the weight and complexity of one set of bogies permanently. If it does, then the only reason to "lift" a bogie set would be to take weight off the rear-most tires to reduce the turning circle at very low speeds - would require something like True Track on the front bogie set at least and could be managed by creative valving of a four-bag system.