Thanks Johnny,
There's many reasons why attachments on email lists are not a good idea.
The primary two are bandwidth and the digest.
If you send a 20MB photo to the list and there are 300 subscribers, then
you just consumed 6GB of bandwidth. While bandwidth may not be much of a
concern for residential internet - it sure is for commercial server
rental.
Believe it or not - all email is plain text. Attachments are encoded into
what appear to be millions of random characters. If you insert that into
a digest volume, then the digest volume becomes useless(more bandwidth
wasted).
There are some workarounds - one list that I subscribe to allows photos
with an 18KB limit. Those are stripped out of the digest. The problem
with that is most people haven't a clue how to resize/compress a jpeg and
still try to post a 20MB file straight from their phone.
I guess that I'm just stuck in the 90's....
Patrick
> I deal with a couple of volunteer organizations, and my normal response to
> 'Why don't we///' it "Git 'er done!"
> Which is to say volunteers tend to do the best they can with what's
> available. Those who want something diofferent should step up and
> implement it.
> Lemme point out, this operation ain't free. Patrick picks up the tab and
> (hopefully) gets sufficient donations to keep it from breaking him. I've
> some stuff to go in the next big flea market, and like the last one, I'll
> send him the proceeds. You might drop a dime or two into his PayPal if
> you
> get any benefit from the group.
>
> --johnny
--
GMCnet Listmaster
Tyrone GA
There's many reasons why attachments on email lists are not a good idea.
The primary two are bandwidth and the digest.
If you send a 20MB photo to the list and there are 300 subscribers, then
you just consumed 6GB of bandwidth. While bandwidth may not be much of a
concern for residential internet - it sure is for commercial server
rental.
Believe it or not - all email is plain text. Attachments are encoded into
what appear to be millions of random characters. If you insert that into
a digest volume, then the digest volume becomes useless(more bandwidth
wasted).
There are some workarounds - one list that I subscribe to allows photos
with an 18KB limit. Those are stripped out of the digest. The problem
with that is most people haven't a clue how to resize/compress a jpeg and
still try to post a 20MB file straight from their phone.
I guess that I'm just stuck in the 90's....
Patrick
> I deal with a couple of volunteer organizations, and my normal response to
> 'Why don't we///' it "Git 'er done!"
> Which is to say volunteers tend to do the best they can with what's
> available. Those who want something diofferent should step up and
> implement it.
> Lemme point out, this operation ain't free. Patrick picks up the tab and
> (hopefully) gets sufficient donations to keep it from breaking him. I've
> some stuff to go in the next big flea market, and like the last one, I'll
> send him the proceeds. You might drop a dime or two into his PayPal if
> you
> get any benefit from the group.
>
> --johnny
--
GMCnet Listmaster
Tyrone GA