what has a person got to do to explain the obvious?

thomas g. warner

New member
Mar 24, 1998
1,863
0
0
We have plowed this ground so many times Paul that we will get no where by
doing it again. Look close our front and rear suspension is like no othe on
the road.

Some people are going to believe what ever they want, contrary to a mountain
of evidence to prove the point that D rated tires should not be used on the
GMC motorhome. Guess the world just has a certain percentage of contrarians
that have to prove a point, that escapes me.

The D vs E rated tires for the GMC motorhome was analyzed in detail in the
June 1983 issue of Trailer life and the July issue of Motorhome.

In addition both General tire and Michelin accepted and verified the
results. What else do we need to know?????

Since you opened the can of worms again lets really beat it up and scare
people. I would be willing to bet that those netters that are still running
D rated tires are inflating them to 65# cold. If they are running E rated
tires they are inflating them to the same. How about everyone stating what
kind of tires they have either D or E and the pressure they are inflated to.
Please check them before you weigh in on the issue once again and please be
honest. I would like to prove a point, and this is not meant to embarrass
anyone. i am just concered for everyones safety. If you have never had this
12,000# missle blow a tire at 60MPH than you have never been scared.

Thanks for the cooperation in advance. We have to kill this dangerous myth
once and for all. We don't want to lose anyone this summer to something we
can correct.

>Tom:
>
>I don't see any concern over sidewall forces in the way our vs. any other
>(i. e. rear wheel drive) coach is driven/used. 99.9% of our driving is in a
>straight line. Now if you lived in Michigan and see the 32 wheel truck
>TRAILERS hauling up to 80 tons cargo, allowed in this state, that would have
>the potential of generating some force's we could talk about! I don't see
>them blowing tires going down the road????
>
>I'm also skeptical of the over loading factor you say they claim. Give me
>the name and phone of the engineer you talked to so I can talk to him.
>
>Using the word "tremendous .." is over dramatization and may be fine in
>theory, but I and many others are and have been using non-steel side wall
>tires without any problems. In fact they were recommended to me as the
>currently best available tire by one of the GMC guru's who also comes from a
>racing background. I'm not aware Wes has any such experience.
>
>What side wall stresses do you see being put on our rear tires that are any
>different than those experienced by other coach's??? Certainly ours have
>less because they are not drive wheels.
>
> Paul Bartz
>
>From: Tom Warner [mailto:warner]
>Sent: Thursday, May 13, 1999 10:26 PM
>Subject: RE: GMC: GMC Motorhome Digest V2 #444
>
>Paul I am sure that you do not really believe that. This subject will be
>covered again in the upcoming issue of GMC motorhome news by Wes Caughlan.
>Michelin engineers told me that the full steel sidewalls were necessary for
>the GMC motorhome because 1) front wheel drive puts tremendous sidewall
>forces when turning at speed over loading them by over 2:1. 2) the rear
>suspension puts stresses on the sidewalls that bias tires cannot handle. The
>extra weight bearing capacity is only one aspect of the necessity of E rated
>tires.
>

>Duane:
>
>I'll repeat it again, I know an individual who called Michelin tech support
>to ask what steel sidewall tires gain you. His answer was extra weight
>carrying capacity.
>
> Paul Bartz
>
>From: duane m simmons [mailto:simmee]
>Sent: Thursday, May 13, 1999 3:30 PM
>Subject: Re: GMC: GMC Motorhome Digest V2 #444
>
>Pete Papas
>
>I think both tires that you are looking at are "Rag Wall" tires not "Steel
>Sidewall tires". The "Rag Wall" Tires will give you better steering control
>in the hwy Ruts, but they will not last very long in our GMC application. I
>know of 3 cases where the "Rag Wall" tires began to Blow Out after 2 years
>of operation. In fact one person lost 4 tires in one trip w/Rag Walls & the
>Tire Company replaced All 7 tires at no cost because they stated that the
>Rag Walls should never been sold for the GMC application. I am a FIRM
>Believer in "All Steel" Tires of Bridgestone/Goodyear/Michelin brand ONLY.
>All other tires are of short life which can cause much much body damage when
>the BLOW. Don't believe the sales person in terms of what the side walls
>are configured. Look at the marking on the tire & verify that they have one
>ply steel for the side wall. This way you know what you are getting. "Rag
>Walls" are a No No IMHO. Its false economy to purchase a cheap tire for our
>coaches. I find that COSTCO is hard to beat in terms of cost & quality of
>service when you are Tire shoping.
>
>
>
Tom & Marg Warner
Vernon Center NY
1976 palmbeach
"The beautiful Mohawk Vally"
 
How about everyone stating what kind of tires they have either D or E and
the pressure they are inflated to.

I now use E rated All Steel Bridgestones and I keep them at 65psi.

As to sidewall stress on the rear tires, Alex Sirum has shown me bias
wheels that split when radial tires are mounted on them. The radial
doesn't like to yield on sharp turns and the bias wheels can't take it.

David Lee Greenberg F22009
GMC Motorhome Registry
200 MacFarlane Drive PH4
Delray Beach, FL 33483-6829
 
Tom:

Suspension isn't what we're talking about. Thought we were talking about
the forces acting on the tires and steel vs. non-steel side wall tires???

Neither I nor Duane below, mentioned anything about D or E ply tires
either. How did that get into this discussion.

I happen to have Bridgestone E type tires and run 55 lbs air in all six.
I've also suffered an inner side wall blowout of a Michelin tire (had those
previous to changing to Alcoa wheels) on the right front rear wheel. Had no
problem driving or stopping the coach and was on an interstate highway with
five people in the coach doing 65 mph at the time. Only damage, other than
to the tire, was the flexible brake hose was broke off at the caliper end
connector and had to be replaced. Cause of the tire failure was a stuck
caliper heating the wheel which consequently elevated the tire pressure.

A couple years ago, I happened to be in the same campground as the engineer
who supervised the GM suspension division and talked to him about then
engineering aspects of our suspension, which naturally he was quit familiar
with.

Tom, I also asked you below for the name and phone number of the Michelin
engineer who you talked to so I can talk to him. Do you have that??

Paul

From: Tom Warner [mailto:warner]
Sent: Friday, May 14, 1999 11:42 AM
Subject: RE: GMC: what has a person got to do to explain the obvious?

We have plowed this ground so many times Paul that we will get no where by
doing it again. Look close our front and rear suspension is like no othe on
the road.

Some people are going to believe what ever they want, contrary to a mountain
of evidence to prove the point that D rated tires should not be used on the
GMC motorhome. Guess the world just has a certain percentage of contrarians
that have to prove a point, that escapes me.

The D vs E rated tires for the GMC motorhome was analyzed in detail in the
June 1983 issue of Trailer life and the July issue of Motorhome.

In addition both General tire and Michelin accepted and verified the
results. What else do we need to know?????

Since you opened the can of worms again lets really beat it up and scare
people. I would be willing to bet that those netters that are still running
D rated tires are inflating them to 65# cold. If they are running E rated
tires they are inflating them to the same. How about everyone stating what
kind of tires they have either D or E and the pressure they are inflated to.
Please check them before you weigh in on the issue once again and please be
honest. I would like to prove a point, and this is not meant to embarrass
anyone. i am just concered for everyones safety. If you have never had this
12,000# missle blow a tire at 60MPH than you have never been scared.

Thanks for the cooperation in advance. We have to kill this dangerous myth
once and for all. We don't want to lose anyone this summer to something we
can correct.

>Tom:
>
>I don't see any concern over sidewall forces in the way our vs. any other
>(i. e. rear wheel drive) coach is driven/used. 99.9% of our driving is in
a
>straight line. Now if you lived in Michigan and see the 32 wheel truck
>TRAILERS hauling up to 80 tons cargo, allowed in this state, that would
have
>the potential of generating some force's we could talk about! I don't see
>them blowing tires going down the road????
>
>I'm also skeptical of the over loading factor you say they claim. Give me
>the name and phone of the engineer you talked to so I can talk to him.
>
>Using the word "tremendous .." is over dramatization and may be fine in
>theory, but I and many others are and have been using non-steel side wall
>tires without any problems. In fact they were recommended to me as the
>currently best available tire by one of the GMC guru's who also comes from
a
>racing background. I'm not aware Wes has any such experience.
>
>What side wall stresses do you see being put on our rear tires that are any
>different than those experienced by other coach's??? Certainly ours have
>less because they are not drive wheels.
>
> Paul Bartz
>
>From: Tom Warner [mailto:warner]
>Sent: Thursday, May 13, 1999 10:26 PM
>Subject: RE: GMC: GMC Motorhome Digest V2 #444
>
>Paul I am sure that you do not really believe that. This subject will be
>covered again in the upcoming issue of GMC motorhome news by Wes Caughlan.
>Michelin engineers told me that the full steel sidewalls were necessary for
>the GMC motorhome because 1) front wheel drive puts tremendous sidewall
>forces when turning at speed over loading them by over 2:1. 2) the rear
>suspension puts stresses on the sidewalls that bias tires cannot handle.
The
>extra weight bearing capacity is only one aspect of the necessity of E
rated
>tires.
>

>Duane:
>
>I'll repeat it again, I know an individual who called Michelin tech support
>to ask what steel sidewall tires gain you. His answer was extra weight
>carrying capacity.
>
> Paul Bartz
>
>From: duane m simmons [mailto:simmee]
>Sent: Thursday, May 13, 1999 3:30 PM
>Subject: Re: GMC: GMC Motorhome Digest V2 #444
>
>Pete Papas
>
>I think both tires that you are looking at are "Rag Wall" tires not "Steel
>Sidewall tires". The "Rag Wall" Tires will give you better steering
control
>in the hwy Ruts, but they will not last very long in our GMC application.
I
>know of 3 cases where the "Rag Wall" tires began to Blow Out after 2 years
>of operation. In fact one person lost 4 tires in one trip w/Rag Walls &
the
>Tire Company replaced All 7 tires at no cost because they stated that the
>Rag Walls should never been sold for the GMC application. I am a FIRM
>Believer in "All Steel" Tires of Bridgestone/Goodyear/Michelin brand ONLY.
>All other tires are of short life which can cause much much body damage
when
>the BLOW. Don't believe the sales person in terms of what the side walls
>are configured. Look at the marking on the tire & verify that they have
one
>ply steel for the side wall. This way you know what you are getting. "Rag
>Walls" are a No No IMHO. Its false economy to purchase a cheap tire for
our
>coaches. I find that COSTCO is hard to beat in terms of cost & quality of
>service when you are Tire shoping.
 
No chicken here...

front E
rear D until next trip or so and then they'll be E's as well. Too much meat
left at the moment and not old timewise.

65 lbs all around and for as long as I can remember, i.e. 200k+.

Heinz

However... had run D's for most of the 200k. Experienced one failure on the
rear caused by a leaking stem but by the time stopped tire was mush. Only
some of my last set was thrown out due to sidewall checking with time.
Michellins always went full tread.
 
>
>How about everyone stating what kind of tires they have either D or E and
>the pressure they are inflated to.

Goodyear G159s LRE
80 PSI (I need to weigh the coach again and adjust pressure, but this works
well for me)

Henry

Henry Davis Consulting, Inc / new product consulting
PO Box 1270 / product readiness reviews
Soquel, Ca 95073 / IP reviews
ph: (831) 462-5199 / full service marketing
fax: (831) 462-5198
http://www.henry-davis.com/ http://www.henry-davis.com
 
Dave:

Thought you had the Bridgestone R 265 tires?? They are non-steel side wall
tires although have steel in the tread area.

Paul Bartz

From: davegreenberg1 [mailto:davegreenberg1]
Sent: Friday, May 14, 1999 12:02 PM
Subject: Re: GMC: what has a person got to do to explain the obvious?

How about everyone stating what kind of tires they have either D or E and
the pressure they are inflated to.

I now use E rated All Steel Bridgestones and I keep them at 65psi.

As to sidewall stress on the rear tires, Alex Sirum has shown me bias
wheels that split when radial tires are mounted on them. The radial
doesn't like to yield on sharp turns and the bias wheels can't take it.
 
Rear Goodyear Tracker 8.75 X 16.5 LT Load Range D 65 psi cold

Blew one out at ~60 mph No problem driving or coming to a stop. Tore up
my dern T panel though. Had a big lump come up on the other one on the
same left side (ply separation I think). Probably what happened to the
first failure but I didn't catch it in time. Wal Mart replaced both of em
at no charge.

Front Goodyear Wrangler 8.75 X 16.5 Load Range D 68 psi cold

These tires are hardly worn. I just can't bring myself to change em out.
(Like I can afford it anyhow!) Maybe I'll hit the lotto one o these days
and I'll toss em in lieu of 16" Alcoa's and G159LT Goodyears. Which is
what I know I oughta be runnin.

bdub
'76 Palm Beach
In The Heart o Texas
www.web-access.net/~bmassey/
icq # 202333
 
Before I answer would like to get all of the inputs on types of tires and
running pressures.

>Tom:
>
>Suspension isn't what we're talking about. Thought we were talking about
>the forces acting on the tires and steel vs. non-steel side wall tires???
>
>Neither I nor Duane below, mentioned anything about D or E ply tires
>either. How did that get into this discussion.
>
>I happen to have Bridgestone E type tires and run 55 lbs air in all six.
>I've also suffered an inner side wall blowout of a Michelin tire (had those
>previous to changing to Alcoa wheels) on the right front rear wheel. Had no
>problem driving or stopping the coach and was on an interstate highway with
>five people in the coach doing 65 mph at the time. Only damage, other than
>to the tire, was the flexible brake hose was broke off at the caliper end
>connector and had to be replaced. Cause of the tire failure was a stuck
>caliper heating the wheel which consequently elevated the tire pressure.
>
>A couple years ago, I happened to be in the same campground as the engineer
>who supervised the GM suspension division and talked to him about then
>engineering aspects of our suspension, which naturally he was quit familiar
>with.
>
>Tom, I also asked you below for the name and phone number of the Michelin
>engineer who you talked to so I can talk to him. Do you have that??
>
> Paul
>
>
>From: Tom Warner [mailto:warner]
>Sent: Friday, May 14, 1999 11:42 AM
>Subject: RE: GMC: what has a person got to do to explain the obvious?
>
>We have plowed this ground so many times Paul that we will get no where by
>doing it again. Look close our front and rear suspension is like no othe on
>the road.
>
>Some people are going to believe what ever they want, contrary to a mountain
>of evidence to prove the point that D rated tires should not be used on the
>GMC motorhome. Guess the world just has a certain percentage of contrarians
>that have to prove a point, that escapes me.
>
>The D vs E rated tires for the GMC motorhome was analyzed in detail in the
>June 1983 issue of Trailer life and the July issue of Motorhome.
>
>In addition both General tire and Michelin accepted and verified the
>results. What else do we need to know?????
>
>Since you opened the can of worms again lets really beat it up and scare
>people. I would be willing to bet that those netters that are still running
>D rated tires are inflating them to 65# cold. If they are running E rated
>tires they are inflating them to the same. How about everyone stating what
>kind of tires they have either D or E and the pressure they are inflated to.
>Please check them before you weigh in on the issue once again and please be
>honest. I would like to prove a point, and this is not meant to embarrass
>anyone. i am just concered for everyones safety. If you have never had this
>12,000# missle blow a tire at 60MPH than you have never been scared.
>
>Thanks for the cooperation in advance. We have to kill this dangerous myth
>once and for all. We don't want to lose anyone this summer to something we
>can correct.
>

>>Tom:
>>
>>I don't see any concern over sidewall forces in the way our vs. any other
>>(i. e. rear wheel drive) coach is driven/used. 99.9% of our driving is in
>a
>>straight line. Now if you lived in Michigan and see the 32 wheel truck
>>TRAILERS hauling up to 80 tons cargo, allowed in this state, that would
>have
>>the potential of generating some force's we could talk about! I don't see
>>them blowing tires going down the road????
>>
>>I'm also skeptical of the over loading factor you say they claim. Give me
>>the name and phone of the engineer you talked to so I can talk to him.
>>
>>Using the word "tremendous .." is over dramatization and may be fine in
>>theory, but I and many others are and have been using non-steel side wall
>>tires without any problems. In fact they were recommended to me as the
>>currently best available tire by one of the GMC guru's who also comes from
>a
>>racing background. I'm not aware Wes has any such experience.
>>
>>What side wall stresses do you see being put on our rear tires that are any
>>different than those experienced by other coach's??? Certainly ours have
>>less because they are not drive wheels.
>>
>> Paul Bartz
>>
>>From: Tom Warner [mailto:warner]
>>Sent: Thursday, May 13, 1999 10:26 PM
>>Subject: RE: GMC: GMC Motorhome Digest V2 #444
>>
>>Paul I am sure that you do not really believe that. This subject will be
>>covered again in the upcoming issue of GMC motorhome news by Wes Caughlan.
>>Michelin engineers told me that the full steel sidewalls were necessary for
>>the GMC motorhome because 1) front wheel drive puts tremendous sidewall
>>forces when turning at speed over loading them by over 2:1. 2) the rear
>>suspension puts stresses on the sidewalls that bias tires cannot handle.
>The
>>extra weight bearing capacity is only one aspect of the necessity of E
>rated
>>tires.
>>

>>Duane:
>>
>>I'll repeat it again, I know an individual who called Michelin tech support
>>to ask what steel sidewall tires gain you. His answer was extra weight
>>carrying capacity.
>>
>> Paul Bartz
>>
>>From: duane m simmons [mailto:simmee]
>>Sent: Thursday, May 13, 1999 3:30 PM
>>Subject: Re: GMC: GMC Motorhome Digest V2 #444
>>
>>Pete Papas
>>
>>I think both tires that you are looking at are "Rag Wall" tires not "Steel
>>Sidewall tires". The "Rag Wall" Tires will give you better steering
>control
>>in the hwy Ruts, but they will not last very long in our GMC application.
>I
>>know of 3 cases where the "Rag Wall" tires began to Blow Out after 2 years
>>of operation. In fact one person lost 4 tires in one trip w/Rag Walls &
>the
>>Tire Company replaced All 7 tires at no cost because they stated that the
>>Rag Walls should never been sold for the GMC application. I am a FIRM
>>Believer in "All Steel" Tires of Bridgestone/Goodyear/Michelin brand ONLY.
>>All other tires are of short life which can cause much much body damage
>when
>>the BLOW. Don't believe the sales person in terms of what the side walls
>>are configured. Look at the marking on the tire & verify that they have
>one
>>ply steel for the side wall. This way you know what you are getting. "Rag
>>Walls" are a No No IMHO. Its false economy to purchase a cheap tire for
>our
>>coaches. I find that COSTCO is hard to beat in terms of cost & quality of
>>service when you are Tire shoping.
>
>
>
Tom & Marg Warner
Vernon Center NY
1976 palmbeach
"The beautiful Mohawk Vally"
 
My coach came with load range "E" Goodyear G159 which I maintain at
65 lbs front and rear. I do that because the previous owner said that was
what he did and he had the coach for 18 years.
Richard Waters '76 PB, Troy, MI
- ------------

> How about everyone stating what kind of tires they have either D or E and
> the pressure they are inflated to.
>
> I now use E rated All Steel Bridgestones and I keep them at 65psi.
>
 
>How about everyone stating what
>kind of tires they have either D or E and the pressure they are inflated
to.

I am using the 8.75R16.5 XPS-RIB load range E Michilan's (4 ply steel tread
/1 ply steel sidewall) inflated to 65psi.

The thing I don't understand about this whole discussion is why would
anyone want to use a D rated tire. Its clear from the discussion, the
recall, the various articles and my personal experience that there is a
potential problem with using D rated tires. So why take the risk?

My thought is that tires are no place to be pinching pennies. I always buy
premium quality tires. I have never had a tire failure on any of the
premium tires that I have used over the years. I always wear them out. The
fact that they usually last longer helps offset some of the extra expense.
But no matter how you look at it, good tires are cheap insurance...

Dave
73 Sequoia
 
You said it all, Dave. My feelings exactly.
Gary
'77 Kingsley

North Bend, Oregon Coast

> >How about everyone stating what
> >kind of tires they have either D or E and the pressure they are inflated
> to.
>
> I am using the 8.75R16.5 XPS-RIB load range E Michilan's (4 ply steel tread
> /1 ply steel sidewall) inflated to 65psi.
>
> The thing I don't understand about this whole discussion is why would
> anyone want to use a D rated tire. Its clear from the discussion, the
> recall, the various articles and my personal experience that there is a
> potential problem with using D rated tires. So why take the risk?
>
> My thought is that tires are no place to be pinching pennies. I always buy
> premium quality tires. I have never had a tire failure on any of the
> premium tires that I have used over the years. I always wear them out. The
> fact that they usually last longer helps offset some of the extra expense.
> But no matter how you look at it, good tires are cheap insurance...
>
> Dave
> 73 Sequoia
 
I'm going to jump in one more time and then I too will leave it alone :-)

It could very well be that I may be alone on this but I don't think that
anyone has a problem with running E's but rather with deciding "when". I'm
probably not alone with having tires that still have a year or so of wear
left, and I mean good wear, not to bald.

Then, when I look at the lack of trouble my tire usage has given me in 15 or
so years and 200k of travel it's a little tough to just throw them out on
opinion alone. And I don't think it's a matter of luck, as my luck doesn't
go in that direction :-)

Who's to say that had GM not tried to save a few bucks and put a top grade
tire on in the first place, the recall/adjust to E's may have never been
made. ( And before you give me flak... I don't consider the General to be a
top line tire. ).

That said... I may throw them out anyway, but maybe just not yet.

Heinz

> >How about everyone stating what
> >kind of tires they have either D or E and the pressure they are
inflated
> to.
>
> I am using the 8.75R16.5 XPS-RIB load range E Michilan's (4 ply steel
tread
> /1 ply steel sidewall) inflated to 65psi.
>
> The thing I don't understand about this whole discussion is why would
> anyone want to use a D rated tire. Its clear from the discussion, the
> recall, the various articles and my personal experience that there is a
> potential problem with using D rated tires. So why take the risk?
>
> My thought is that tires are no place to be pinching pennies. I always buy
> premium quality tires. I have never had a tire failure on any of the
> premium tires that I have used over the years. I always wear them out. The
> fact that they usually last longer helps offset some of the extra expense.
> But no matter how you look at it, good tires are cheap insurance...
>
> Dave
> 73 Sequoia
>
>
 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gmcmotorhome
> [mailto:owner-gmcmotorhome]On Behalf Of Dave
> Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 1999 9:32 AM
> To: gmcmotorhome
> Subject: RE: GMC: what has a person got to do to explain the obvious?
>
>
>I am using the 8.75R16.5 XPS-RIB load range E Michilan's (4 ply
> steel tread /1 ply steel sidewall) inflated to 65psi.
>
> The thing I don't understand about this whole discussion is why would
> anyone want to use a D rated tire. Its clear from the discussion, the
> recall, the various articles and my personal experience that there is a
> potential problem with using D rated tires. So why take the risk?
>
> My thought is that tires are no place to be pinching pennies. I always buy
> premium quality tires. I have never had a tire failure on any of the
> premium tires that I have used over the years. I always wear them out. The
> fact that they usually last longer helps offset some of the extra expense.
> But no matter how you look at it, good tires are cheap insurance...
>
> Dave
> 73 Sequoia

Dave, I agree with you completely about not wanting to take a risk on 'D'
rated tires, when 'E' rated tires are specified. However, I have been a GMC
owner for 17 years, and I somehow missed the 'D' recall. Therefore, I have
always replaced my tires with the ones listed in the owner's manual, and I
have never had a failure.

This doesn't mean that I endorse 'D' rated tires in our application, and I
will replace mine with 'E' rated tires when replacement is necessary. But I
don't think 'D' rated tires represent a "crisis" that needs to be remedied
at any cost. Motorhomes are large vehicles that place large demands upon
their tires. Proper maintenance of these tires, especially inflation
pressures, alignment, and loading are important. 'E' rated tires will
increase the margin for error, but they will not end all tire failure.

Scott Shean
78 Royale
Baton Rouge, LA