I have done so, but I eliminated the isolator and installed a combiner in
its place.
I can’t say I’ve needed to monitor the charging from the alternator closely
enough to notice any improvement.
I suspect my primary wire from the alternator to the master power terminal
could be bigger, but I don’t worry much. Alternator output ratings are
peak, and require optimal temperatures and RPMs to attain a large fraction
thereof.
Jim is right that it could be sized by downstream demands. Lead-acid
batteries can only take about 25 amps charging, as I recall, so two
depleted batteries will draw 50 amps. The air pump might draw 10 amps, and
a supplemental vacuum pump the same. Headlights are less. Ignition is much
less, even with HEI. Even with a “larger” alternator, I doubt we really
overload the stock wire from the alternator.
Corroded connectors? That’s a whole other thing. And wiring a battery
backwards? Not good; ask me how I know.
I’d bet that *most* cases of poor charging or starting current are related
to bad ground straps. I’ve replaced all those, too, and it’s probably about
time to do it again. I ran a large-diameter wire (maybe #2, but I don’t
recall) from the battery to a bolt on the engine block, and from there to a
chassis bolt.
Rick “about time to go battery shopping anyway” Denney
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 9:36 AM tonka6cuda6--- via Gmclist <
> Has anyone taken the time to upgrade all 3 or 4 charge wires for the
> engine side? (So alt poss to bat...alt neg to bat or block....neg bat to
> frame....neg frame to engine...i know we have an isolator in there but you
> get the picture). Did you see an improvement in charging?
> --
> Rich Mondor,
>
> Brockville, ON
>
> 77 Hughes 2600
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
>
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
--
'73 X-Glacier 230 "Jaws"
Northern Virginia
Offlist email: rick at rickdenney dot com