Tire, Pressures, Weighing

tmaki1

New member
Aug 25, 1999
462
0
0
Greetings, all!

Over the last few days I've been watching the conversations re: tire
pressures, loads, failures, etc. Apparently, this is the topic du jour in
not just this forum, but also on one of the RV newsgroups,
rec.outdoors.rv-travel. A number of the participants on this mailing
list may also have been following the oftimes less than hospitable
exchanges over there concerning this topic, especially between a
couple of the more opinionated participants.

There appears to be not so much confusion as interpretative
disagreements about what tire manufacturers state in their inflation
tables, and what is embossed on the sidewalls of tires. Without
getting into some the technical minutiae of the discussion (and
believe me, the discussion has been valuable from a technical
standpoint) I'd like to share a couple of things that might be
germane to it.

Last Thursday afternoon, the engineering manager here in the
Towables Division (Fleetwood Enterprises, the big SOB
manufacturer) handed me a copy of a seminar guide from an
organization called "A Weigh We Go". (Please forgive if most of
you know about this organization already). They travel around the
country doing seminars on proper weighing of RVs and the
relationships between tires, inflation pressures, speed,
temperature, etc. They carry a number of wheel scales and for a
relatively reasonable fee, will weigh coaches, do a computerized
weight analysis and assist an owner in arriving at an understanding
of how tires are affected by weight and speed. This organization is
sponsored by many well-known RV manufacturers, tire
manufacturers, RV and automotive specialty suppliers, etc.
(Fleetwood neither sponsors or endorses them. Not because they
don't do good and accurate work, just because it's company policy
not to sponsor such things.)

The organization has a Web site:

http://aweighwego.org

or you can contact them at:

A Weigh We Go
211 Mae McKee Rd.
Chuckey, TN 37611
(423) 257-7985
John Anderson

I've checked it out, and have also read their seminar materials. The
Web site doesn't really tell their whole story. But the service they
provide might be one of those things that could be scheduled or
included in a GMC rally of some sort. I'm sure they would be
approachable by whomever it is that puts these rallies together. In
my thinking, a vendor or provider of such a service as this would
have to be at least as valuable as someone selling used parts or
the latest wheel polish. I'm impressed by the level of knowledge,
skill, and persistence of this (GMC) group, and in the quest for
making our coaches the best they can be, second only to making
ourselves the most capable and knowledgable RV (and personal
motoring coach) owners on the roads. "A Weigh We Go" might just
prove to be one of those fixtures at rallies that gets invited back
time after time. Just a thought. Do with as you see fit.

Additionally, Tom (our engineering manager) this morning handed
me the Tire and Rim Association Year Book (1996). Although a
couple of years old, pertinent data is still timely and applicable.

Although many of you probably have the pages from this manual
pasted to your sun visors, I've taken it upon myself to scan and
place on my Web page a couple of important tables to at least give
a flavor of the material in this book -- one the load and inflation table
for light truck metric tires for trucks, busses, etc. mounted on 5
degree drop center rims, and the load limits table for various
speeds. Both of theses tables come out of the Truck-Bus section,
not the Passenger Car section.

Use the information as you will to further your understanding of the
relationships involved. I'll not offer any interpretative comment,
except that I believe (and concur with our engineering manager)
that the expression "Tire Load Limits at Various Cold Inflation
Pressures" means that to carry the number of pounds indicated on
the table, you have to inflate the tire to the indicated psi to carry
those pounds within the speed range of the tire. Your belief system
may be different.

If you want to download the tables (they are in .PDF format,
readable and printable with Acrobat Reader) go to:

http://www.pe.net/~tmaki/

Click on "The Library", then on "The Bottom Drawer". The files are
listed under the "GMC Topics and Resources".

May this small candle be of more value as light than heat.

Later!

Toby Maki
73 Glacier 230
Redlands, CA
 
In 1998 we had our coach weighed at a hiway weigh station at 11,720 This
was with driver, passenger, 250# wheel chair and loaded for travel. At
Albuquerque, we had it weighed again so we'd know how the load was
balanced. The total for the six wheels was 11,950# but without the
passenger and chair, and with less volume in the various tanks. Could there
be this much variation in "certified" scales? Any other ideas?
TIA

Dave (& Dege), '76 Royale, Santa Barbara, CA
 
Very interesting -- maybe we have another myth to explore: THE SUM OF
INDIVIDUAL WHEEL WEIGHTS DOES NOT EQUAL THE TOTAL WEIGHT OF THE COACH.
I have backed through the truck scales, one side at a time. I recorded the
weight first (rear tire, one side), then weight recorded next (both rear
tires, one side) and then the next weight (front-rear tire, one side)---in
such a way that the rear most tire is off the scale and the front-front is not
yet on the scale). I find that when I add the first and third weights I get
LESS that the second weight. Same for the other side.

Could it be that some weight is transferred to the higher rear tire (the one
off the scale bed), thus not accounted for in the total??

Gary and Edie
North Bend, Oregon Coast

> In 1998 we had our coach weighed at a hiway weigh station at 11,720 This
> was with driver, passenger, 250# wheel chair and loaded for travel. At
> Albuquerque, we had it weighed again so we'd know how the load was
> balanced. The total for the six wheels was 11,950# but without the
> passenger and chair, and with less volume in the various tanks. Could there
> be this much variation in "certified" scales? Any other ideas?
> TIA
>
> Dave (& Dege), '76 Royale, Santa Barbara, CA
 
I think I would agree with that theory. I also believe that weighing the
four corners is adequate. Weighing all six wheels may be too much
information which could be false. Darren

>
> Very interesting -- maybe we have another myth to explore: THE SUM OF
> INDIVIDUAL WHEEL WEIGHTS DOES NOT EQUAL THE TOTAL WEIGHT OF THE COACH.
> I have backed through the truck scales, one side at a time. I recorded the
> weight first (rear tire, one side), then weight recorded next (both rear
> tires, one side) and then the next weight (front-rear tire, one side)---in
> such a way that the rear most tire is off the scale and the front-front is not
> yet on the scale). I find that when I add the first and third weights I get
> LESS that the second weight. Same for the other side.
>
> Could it be that some weight is transferred to the higher rear tire (the one
> off the scale bed), thus not accounted for in the total??
>
> Gary and Edie
> North Bend, Oregon Coast
>

>
> > In 1998 we had our coach weighed at a hiway weigh station at 11,720 This
> > was with driver, passenger, 250# wheel chair and loaded for travel. At
> > Albuquerque, we had it weighed again so we'd know how the load was
> > balanced. The total for the six wheels was 11,950# but without the
> > passenger and chair, and with less volume in the various tanks. Could there
> > be this much variation in "certified" scales? Any other ideas?
> > TIA
> >
> > Dave (& Dege), '76 Royale, Santa Barbara, CA

- --
Darren Paget
76 Experimental
Another Fab Day
paget
http://www.TZEplus.com
 
Could there be this much variation in "certified" scales? Any other
ideas?
>TIA
>
>Dave (& Dege), '76 Royale, Santa Barbara, CA
>
>
Even a 5% variance would put these scales in the ball park. I would be
surprised if commercial scales were any moer accurate than that.

Dave Greenberg
GMC MOTORHOME REGISTRY
Seagate Towers 200 MacFarlane Dr PH4
Delray Beach, FL 33483-6829
 
Having had lots of experience with scales as a x-country trucker I can tell you
that no two weigh exactly the same, most not even close. In some states that have
reader boards where you can see the weight from the cab of the truck I have often
seen differences of 1,000# or more on scales less than 100 miles apart. Of
course you have to remember thats 1,000# on an 80,000# gvw. If you figure
percentage its not quite so bad. Another thing, the vehicle has to be level to
get proper weight the scales are level but if you have one side of vehicle off,
you may not be. Also, use of brakes on scale can affect weight of axle. Just
think, if the scale is off only 100# and you weigh each wheel seperately you are
looking at a potiential 600# error.
Bill

> Very interesting -- maybe we have another myth to explore: THE SUM OF
> INDIVIDUAL WHEEL WEIGHTS DOES NOT EQUAL THE TOTAL WEIGHT OF THE COACH.
> I have backed through the truck scales, one side at a time. I recorded the
> weight first (rear tire, one side), then weight recorded next (both rear
> tires, one side) and then the next weight (front-rear tire, one side)---in
> such a way that the rear most tire is off the scale and the front-front is not
> yet on the scale). I find that when I add the first and third weights I get
> LESS that the second weight. Same for the other side.
>
> Could it be that some weight is transferred to the higher rear tire (the one
> off the scale bed), thus not accounted for in the total??
>
> Gary and Edie
> North Bend, Oregon Coast
>

>
> > In 1998 we had our coach weighed at a hiway weigh station at 11,720 This
> > was with driver, passenger, 250# wheel chair and loaded for travel. At
> > Albuquerque, we had it weighed again so we'd know how the load was
> > balanced. The total for the six wheels was 11,950# but without the
> > passenger and chair, and with less volume in the various tanks. Could there
> > be this much variation in "certified" scales? Any other ideas?
> > TIA
> >
> > Dave (& Dege), '76 Royale, Santa Barbara, CA
 
Gary the sum of the individual wheel weights ALWAYS equals the total weight
if each tire is weighed at the same time. Thats the method to use if you
really want to know what is going on with the weights.

>Very interesting -- maybe we have another myth to explore: THE SUM OF
>INDIVIDUAL WHEEL WEIGHTS DOES NOT EQUAL THE TOTAL WEIGHT OF THE COACH.
>I have backed through the truck scales, one side at a time. I recorded the
>weight first (rear tire, one side), then weight recorded next (both rear
>tires, one side) and then the next weight (front-rear tire, one side)---in
>such a way that the rear most tire is off the scale and the front-front is not
>yet on the scale). I find that when I add the first and third weights I get
>LESS that the second weight. Same for the other side.
>
>Could it be that some weight is transferred to the higher rear tire (the one
>off the scale bed), thus not accounted for in the total??
>
>Gary and Edie
>North Bend, Oregon Coast
>

>
>> In 1998 we had our coach weighed at a hiway weigh station at 11,720 This
>> was with driver, passenger, 250# wheel chair and loaded for travel. At
>> Albuquerque, we had it weighed again so we'd know how the load was
>> balanced. The total for the six wheels was 11,950# but without the
>> passenger and chair, and with less volume in the various tanks. Could there
>> be this much variation in "certified" scales? Any other ideas?
>> TIA
>>
>> Dave (& Dege), '76 Royale, Santa Barbara, CA
>
>
>
>
 
Tom--The "IF EACH WHEEL IS WEIGHED AT THE SAME TIME" is the key. Weighing one
wheel at a time can/does cause error.
Gary & Edie
North Bend, Oregon Coast (stormy and rain)

> Gary the sum of the individual wheel weights ALWAYS equals the total weight
> if each tire is weighed at the same time. Thats the method to use if you
> really want to know what is going on with the weights.
>

> >Very interesting -- maybe we have another myth to explore: THE SUM OF
> >INDIVIDUAL WHEEL WEIGHTS DOES NOT EQUAL THE TOTAL WEIGHT OF THE COACH.
> >I have backed through the truck scales, one side at a time. I recorded the
> >weight first (rear tire, one side), then weight recorded next (both rear
> >tires, one side) and then the next weight (front-rear tire, one side)---in
> >such a way that the rear most tire is off the scale and the front-front is not
> >yet on the scale). I find that when I add the first and third weights I get
> >LESS that the second weight. Same for the other side.
> >
> >Could it be that some weight is transferred to the higher rear tire (the one
> >off the scale bed), thus not accounted for in the total??
> >
> >Gary and Edie
> >North Bend, Oregon Coast
> >

> >
> >> In 1998 we had our coach weighed at a hiway weigh station at 11,720 This
> >> was with driver, passenger, 250# wheel chair and loaded for travel. At
> >> Albuquerque, we had it weighed again so we'd know how the load was
> >> balanced. The total for the six wheels was 11,950# but without the
> >> passenger and chair, and with less volume in the various tanks. Could there
> >> be this much variation in "certified" scales? Any other ideas?
> >> TIA
> >>
> >> Dave (& Dege), '76 Royale, Santa Barbara, CA
> >
> >
> >
> >
 
Gary you are of course right. But weighing each axel tells you nothing
either as indicated by Cinnabars research. No two tires on the GMC
motorhome ever carry the same weight, even on the same bogie side.

>Tom--The "IF EACH WHEEL IS WEIGHED AT THE SAME TIME" is the key. Weighing one
>wheel at a time can/does cause error.
>Gary & Edie
>North Bend, Oregon Coast (stormy and rain)
>

>
>> Gary the sum of the individual wheel weights ALWAYS equals the total weight
>> if each tire is weighed at the same time. Thats the method to use if you
>> really want to know what is going on with the weights.
>>

>> >Very interesting -- maybe we have another myth to explore: THE SUM OF
>> >INDIVIDUAL WHEEL WEIGHTS DOES NOT EQUAL THE TOTAL WEIGHT OF THE COACH.
>> >I have backed through the truck scales, one side at a time. I recorded the
>> >weight first (rear tire, one side), then weight recorded next (both rear
>> >tires, one side) and then the next weight (front-rear tire, one side)---in
>> >such a way that the rear most tire is off the scale and the front-front
is not
>> >yet on the scale). I find that when I add the first and third weights I get
>> >LESS that the second weight. Same for the other side.
>> >
>> >Could it be that some weight is transferred to the higher rear tire (the one
>> >off the scale bed), thus not accounted for in the total??
>> >
>> >Gary and Edie
>> >North Bend, Oregon Coast
>> >

>> >
>> >> In 1998 we had our coach weighed at a hiway weigh station at 11,720 This
>> >> was with driver, passenger, 250# wheel chair and loaded for travel. At
>> >> Albuquerque, we had it weighed again so we'd know how the load was
>> >> balanced. The total for the six wheels was 11,950# but without the
>> >> passenger and chair, and with less volume in the various tanks. Could
there
>> >> be this much variation in "certified" scales? Any other ideas?
>> >> TIA
>> >>
>> >> Dave (& Dege), '76 Royale, Santa Barbara, CA
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
>
>
>