Time to destroy the D rated tire myth for the GMC. or"How to drive fat dumb and happy without worry

john wright

New member
Nov 4, 1998
1,064
0
0
Good Post Tom!

J.R.

>
> So far many have posted information on the inflation pressures and types of
> tires various netters use on their coaches. It is obvious that the choice of
> tires for the GMC motorhome is a complex issue and it is complicated by the
> fact that most of us think we are experts because we have used tires for so
> many years on our automobiles. However if we take that attitude with the GMC
> we are going to get into trouble fast. You cannot compare car tires to ones
> used for an RV and especially not the GMC. The GMCmotorhome uses TRUCK TIRES.
>
> I am a perfect example of the ignorance that surrounded this issue, before
> this forum and our discussions. I bought a 1976 palmbeach March 1998, tires
> looked good(Michelins), much bigger and heavier than my car tires, they were
> the proper tires for the vehicle (glovebox sticker told me that)and fat dumb
> and happy I started to drive it. I told myself that the tires could be
> changed later during the winter.
>
> After several thousand miles of driving, first tire went and than a
> catastrophic failure on the second causing over a $1000 damage to the coach
> (generator door, skirt, air bag and paint). Thats when I started looking for
> information. If you have never had a really bad blow out you haven't lived.
> It sounded like a bomb going off in the rear of the coach, complete with
> fire and smoke. Fire later determined to be from the steel belts hitting on
> the bogie suspension and producing lots of sparks. wonder what that would
> have been like on the propane tank side if the tank had been turned on and
> additionally had a leak? Maybe break the LSR?
>
> Some things I found out:
>
> 1. Auto tires have a RECOMMENDED and MAXIMUM cold pressure rating, and
> TRUCK TIRES have a MINIMUM cold pressure rating to carry MAXIMUM loads. Big
> difference, and very critical. If you mix up these two concepts you are
> asking for trouble.
>
> 2. On radial truck tires(ours for the GMC motorhome) the number of plies
> has no meaning! Load range and inflation pressure are the determining
> factors. In other words the GMC needs E rated tires but if you inflate them
> incorrectly you only have a D range or less tire.
>
> 3. A load range E tire is only a load range E tire if it is inflated to the
> correct pressure for the load. And that is critical also. Truck tires
> typically are inflated to carry the present load and this can vary day to
> day in commercial operations by knowedgable people.
>
> 4. GMC rims need Schrader TR570 metal stems and metal sealing caps to hold
> the correct pressure long term. Alcoa rims come with them mounted.
>
> 5. During separate East and West coast GMC motorhome rallys some time ago,
> 86% of the motorhomes tested had underinflated tires and could not carry the
> measured weight safely. At those same rallys 61% of the coaches were
> exceeding their gross vehicle weight. I will make a bet with all of you. If
> you check your pressures right now ( many of you can't since your hubcaps
> are in the way and you have to remove them to check), at least one and
> probably all of your pressures are incorrect for the tires.
>
> 6. Highest tire loading appears to be on the right front tire and can reach
> 3000# if the air suspension is malfunctioning or as some have said they
> dirve in hold! That greatly exceeds the load carrying capacity of all D
> rated tires.
>
> 7. In the case of the GMC motorhome, the tires load is constantly changing
> because of the independent front and rear suspension. If you don't want to
> exceed the recommended tire loads, than the system must be working properly.
>
> I am still learning and as I find out more will post.
>
> Anyone find out anymore facts?
>

> >In a message dated 5/14/99 9:07:19 PM Central Daylight Time,

> >
> >>
> >> My coach came with load range "E" Goodyear G159 which I maintain at
> >> 65 lbs front and rear. I do that because the previous owner said that was
> >> what he did and he had the coach for 18 years.
> >
> >The previous owner of my coach installed "D" load rated 2 + 2 ply Kelly
> >radial tires with 30 PSI mounted on non-radial wheels. He's the same one who
> >insured me they were all radial wheels, the one who installed the 16 ga wire
> >toting 6 volts to the HEI, and the one who didn't know the water pipe going
> >to the commode had burst from freezing 2 years earlier........Ad Nauseum
> >Infinitum.
> >He's the reason I'm going to "E"'s and 65 PSI, and Scott Shean is the
> >reason I have radial wheels to put them on.
> >(and LSU taking out KY is the reason my Diamond Dawgs are going to the SEC
> >tournament next week, 'cause MSU let Ole Miss get away last night - ain't
> >won but 1Friday game all year)
> >
> >Lanier
> >
> >
> Tom & Marg Warner
> Vernon Center NY
> 1976 palmbeach
> "The beautiful Mohawk Vally"
 
Here's some load vs inflation pressure info for a LT225/75R16 tire (single not
dual mount):
At 55 psi- load limit 2060 lbs
At 60 psi- load limit 2190 lbs
At 65 psi- load limit 2335 lbs (equals D rating)
At 70 psi- load limit 2440 lbs
At 75 psi- load limit 2560 lbs
At 80 psi- load limit 2680 lbs (equals E rating)
Source www.trucktires/Loadinfl/table/table13.htm

As for steel vs. polyester sidewall construction, steel makes a tougher, stiffer
tire- also harsher ride quality. Personally, I think our coaches need flexibility
to cope with the lateral forces on the rear tires when turning sharply. As long
as the tire is inflated properly for the load conditions (and rated to handle that
pressure) one should be as capable as the other.

My coach weighed out at 4,260 lbs front (~2130 per tire) and 8,060 lbs rear
(~2,015 per tire)- trip ready. I've been keeping 60 psi in rears and 65 psi in
fronts. Guess I could back off 5 psi and still be OK.

Clark Searle
Mt. Pleasant, MI

> Anyone find out anymore facts?
>
 
> Correction: source is www.trucktires.com/Loadinfl/table/table13.htm

Also, inflation pressures listed are cold inflation numbers.

Clark

> Here's some load vs inflation pressure info for a LT225/75R16 tire (single not
> dual mount):
> At 55 psi- load limit 2060 lbs
> At 60 psi- load limit 2190 lbs
> At 65 psi- load limit 2335 lbs (equals D rating)
> At 70 psi- load limit 2440 lbs
> At 75 psi- load limit 2560 lbs
> At 80 psi- load limit 2680 lbs (equals E rating)
> Source www.trucktires/Loadinfl/table/table13.htm
>
> As for steel vs. polyester sidewall construction, steel makes a tougher, stiffer
> tire- also harsher ride quality. Personally, I think our coaches need flexibility
> to cope with the lateral forces on the rear tires when turning sharply. As long
> as the tire is inflated properly for the load conditions (and rated to handle that
> pressure) one should be as capable as the other.
>
> My coach weighed out at 4,260 lbs front (~2130 per tire) and 8,060 lbs rear
> (~2,015 per tire)- trip ready. I've been keeping 60 psi in rears and 65 psi in
> fronts. Guess I could back off 5 psi and still be OK.
>
> Clark Searle
> Mt. Pleasant, MI
>

>
> > Anyone find out anymore facts?
> >
 
Clark...

Thank you, thank you, thank you :-)

....and you too Tom.

Perhaps I'll buy my E's 'before' the next trip [g]

Heinz

- ----- Original Message -----
From: Clark Searle
To:
Sent: Saturday, May 15, 1999 7:38 PM
Subject: Re: GMC: Time to destroy the D rated tire myth for the GMC. or"How
to drive fat dumb and happy without worry"

> Here's some load vs inflation pressure info for a LT225/75R16 tire (single
not
> dual mount):
> At 55 psi- load limit 2060 lbs
> At 60 psi- load limit 2190 lbs
> At 65 psi- load limit 2335 lbs (equals D rating)
> At 70 psi- load limit 2440 lbs
> At 75 psi- load limit 2560 lbs
> At 80 psi- load limit 2680 lbs (equals E rating)
> Source www.trucktires/Loadinfl/table/table13.htm
>
> As for steel vs. polyester sidewall construction, steel makes a tougher,
stiffer
> tire- also harsher ride quality. Personally, I think our coaches need
flexibility
> to cope with the lateral forces on the rear tires when turning sharply.
As long
> as the tire is inflated properly for the load conditions (and rated to
handle that
> pressure) one should be as capable as the other.
>
> My coach weighed out at 4,260 lbs front (~2130 per tire) and 8,060 lbs
rear
> (~2,015 per tire)- trip ready. I've been keeping 60 psi in rears and 65
psi in
> fronts. Guess I could back off 5 psi and still be OK.
>
> Clark Searle
> Mt. Pleasant, MI
>

>
> > Anyone find out anymore facts?
> >
>
>
 
Been pondering this some... and am getting a little more confused (easy to
do).

According to the weight of our GMC and the chart below there is really no
difference between running a load range D or E tire as we're only running
60-65lbs of pressure, so even a tire with load range E at 65 lbs is at
capacity, same as a load range D tire.

It simply means that Load Range D rated tires are at their maximum rating vs
being able to crank up a load range E to 80 lbs to carry more stuff or run
the E overinflated for the weight they carry.

How many are running E's at 80 lbs and what kind of a ride is it in
comparison to 60-65?

Looks like more research needed before I head to the tire store.

Heinz

>
> > Here's some load vs inflation pressure info for a LT225/75R16 tire
(single not
> > dual mount):
> > At 55 psi- load limit 2060 lbs
> > At 60 psi- load limit 2190 lbs
> > At 65 psi- load limit 2335 lbs (equals D rating)
> > At 70 psi- load limit 2440 lbs
> > At 75 psi- load limit 2560 lbs
> > At 80 psi- load limit 2680 lbs (equals E rating)
 
They have got 50# in each of them now, but the coach is jacked up off the
floor a foot, while I work on it. tire company inflated them to that
pressure during installation and as yet they have not been on the road.
After I get the front hubs and bearings together tomorrow, replace the
driver side air bags and air line, I will inflate them to 75# which is the
minimum recommended pressure for the LT22575R16 E rated radial tires, to
carry their rated 2680# load.Inflate them to 65# and they become D rated
tires and can only carry 2360 Crazy isn't it?

Just a side note. I had intended to send Michelin an e-mail and ask for
their spec sheet on the Lt225 75R16 radial truck tires. I believe even at
75# they may be under inflated by 10 why? The rule of thumb for truck
tires is to inflate to the minimum inflation pressure to carry the rated
load and add 10 That would mean 80 Seems like a lot doesn't it?



>
>> Good Post Tom!
>>
>> J.R.
>>
>
>
>Yes indeed, but you forgot to tell us what tire pressure you're running on
>your E's, Tom.
>
>Heinz
>
>
>
>
>
Tom & Marg Warner
Vernon Center NY
1976 palmbeach
"The beautiful Mohawk Vally"
 
> carry their rated 2680# load.Inflate them to 65# and they become D rated
> tires and can only carry 2360 Crazy isn't it?

Yes it is. Do we really need that extra 300 lbs of capacity?
I'm not real comfortable with running my tires at 80# cold... aside from
that I'd guess the ride would be rougher ? no?

I do have to keep thinking back to my last 200k of travel with only one
blowout, that wasn't really a blowout as per your description but merely a
flat that didn't get stopped fast enough. I lost a little corner of the
propane door due to flinging steel belting. This was with Load Range D...
mostly Michelins.

I do keep a close eye on pressure though... while I may not be 'always' at
60/65, I am most of the time and now with the tire sensor I know I won't go
below 54# unless it's intentional.

The research continues...

Heinz
 
Now we are getting to the "rest of the story" as Paul Harvey always says.
Now at least everyone is asking questions and looking for facts and answers
and thats what we are all about. Both Clarke and Heinz have got part fact
and fiction in their posts and thats how these myths get so heavily
entrenched and are hard to kill. And that is the problem. We are trying to
apply good old common automotive sense to a Truck tire problem and it
wouldn't work.

Clarke said: "As for steel vs. polyester sidewall construction, steel makes
a tougher, stiffer tire- also harsher ride quality. To cope with the lateral
forces on the rear tires when turning sharply. As long as the tire is
inflated properly for the load conditions (and rated to handle that
pressure) one should be as capable as the other."

1."steel makes a tougher, stiffer tire" True to some extent but it also
produces a tire able to withstand higher sidewall forces without self
destructing.

2. "also harsher ride quality." This statement is not generally true. When
General motors did the engineering tests on the Michelin tires that were
going to replace the recalled General D rated tires, they found in blind
tests that drivers of the GMC motorhome could not tell the difference
between 65 and 80# of tire pressure. Hard to believe isn't it?

3."Personally, I think our coaches need flexibility to ..." And that is the
biggest part of the myth. We need full steel E rated tires because the GMC
puts such high stresses on the sidewalls. If you don't believe it just
follow a GMC down the road. One of the largest complaints owners have is
the "wiggle waggle". When turning, one rear wheel goes in one direction and
the opposite side goes in the other.
Clarke said: "My coach weighed out at 4,260 lbs front (~2130 per tire) and
8,060 lbs rear (~2,015 per tire)- trip ready. I've been keeping 60 psi in
rears and 65 psi in fronts. Guess I could back off 5 psi and still be OK."

1. First you almost never have the same weight on either both fronts or any
two rears. How did you measure the front and rear axel weights? If you
backed the front of the coach onto a scale and weighed it and than the back,
than the numbers will not be correct. In addition you can't measure axel
weight and assume that the load is equally divided between the tires. It
isn't. For a typical 12,560 coach the following weights were measured
on the 6 INDIVIDUAL tires:

LF 2190#, RF 2150#, Lintermediate 2090#, Rintermediate 2000#, Lrear 2140#,
Rrear 1990#

these figures change with each coach and between models because of the
interior layout and options, ie; royals and Palm beaches and between
years.And yes 61% of the coaches on the road are over weight. Do you tow a
toad? than if you do not have car brakes upon stopping you are over loading
the rear coach tires.

And now for Heinz:

"According to the weight of our GMC and the chart below there is really no
difference between running a load range D or E tire as we're only running
60-65lbs of pressure, so even a tire with load range E at 65 lbs is at
capacity, same as a load range D tire."

You are missing the point. Its not the load, its the sidewall forces that
the D rated tire will not handle. The E rated tire will not handle them
either unless you have them inflated to minimum E rated capacity and that
appears to be 80# for the Michelin Lt225/75R16 all steel truck tire. Under
inflate a tire and you decrease its life, increase heat thru excessive
stressing of the sidewalls, and increase rolling resistance which translates
to decreased mileage.

Thats enough propoganda for tonight. Unless someone agrees with me, like
Heinz I am going to get confused.
Tom & Marg Warner
Vernon Center NY
1976 palmbeach
"The beautiful Mohawk Vally"
 
>Been pondering this some... and am getting a little more confused (easy to
>do).
>
- -snip-
>
>How many are running E's at 80 lbs and what kind of a ride is it in
>comparison to 60-65?
>

Heinz,

Funny you should ask. I run 80 PSI on G159s (I did until today when I
dropped the pressure and took a short test drive). At 80 PSI the ride is a
bit rougher than at 65 PSI for the roads that I drove on today (moderate
quality). No perceptable difference in handling ruts. Jolts from shallow
holes weren't as bad - by a good bit.

I've pumped 'em back up to 80 PSI. When I get the chance to weigh the
coach properly then I'll adjust tire pressure. I overload the coach by
about 500 lbs when traveling across country according to the vehicle max
rating. Even so, 65 PSI gives more than enough load carrying capacity for me.

FWIW, tread wear appears to be OK across the tire. If the tires were really
overinflated I'd expect to see more center wear.

YMMV.

Henry

Henry Davis Consulting, Inc / new product consulting
PO Box 1270 / product readiness reviews
Soquel, Ca 95073 / IP reviews
ph: (831) 462-5199 / full service marketing
fax: (831) 462-5198
http://www.henry-davis.com/ http://www.henry-davis.com
 
Thanks very much for posting your weights, Dave. I'm just going to have to
make one of the 'meets' one day... now one more reason, though I'm almost
chicken to weigh mine.

But, this means to me that a Bridgestone (and probably most other LIGHT
TRUCK tires) R265 with a D Load Rating seems adequate, perhaps even proper.

Why proper? The R265 - D's tire load limit/cold inflation is listed as
2335 and the E's as 2680 That would imply (to me at least) that a D
is designed with my weight and pressure in mind while with the E I'm running
at less than designed specs which sometimes has the reverse effect of what
one thinks, in this case perhaps not necessarily and extra safety, etc
unless run at the designed for 80 (BTW, my fronts are R265's E from an
earlier bout/thread inflated to 65#)

As Dave mentioned... you can't add more weight just because your tire is
capable of it so are we overreacting a bit here? It may not be so much D vs
E but to have a proper tire, period... i.e. what's referred to in the
industry as a light truck tire.

Still confused and befuddled...

Heinz

P.S. Pardon me if I added to the confusion in an earlier post. Did not mean
to imply that by going the E/80# route that you can add more stuff to your
GMC :-)

>
> Tom's weights by wheel:
>
> >LF 2190#, RF 2150#, Lintermediate 2090#, Rintermediate 2000#, Lrear
> 2140#, Rrear 1990#
> >
> Dave's weights by wheel:
>
> LF 2000#, RF 1875#, L Intermediate 2200#, R Intermediate 2,050#, Lrear
> 2200#, R rear 2050#
>
>
> The Max Gross Vehicle Weight Restriction (GVWR) for a 1977 is 11,700 I
> weighed in at 12,345 and while I was within tire load capacity I was way
> over on axle capacities in the rear.
>
 
snip.......
>It simply means that Load Range D rated tires are at their maximum
>rating vs
>being able to crank up a load range E to 80 lbs to carry more stuff or
>run
>the E overinflated for the weight they carry.

>Guys and gals...don't forget the other limiting factor. You have to
consider maximum axle ratings also. Increasing tire pressure to carry
weight in excess of the axle's ability to carry the weight could be
problematical. The wheels have their own weight restrictions so you have
to plan for the weak leak.

I think.

David Lee Greenberg
GMC Motorhome Registry
200 MacFarlane Drive
Delray Beach, FL 33483-6829
 
Tom's weights by wheel:

>LF 2190#, RF 2150#, Lintermediate 2090#, Rintermediate 2000#, Lrear
2140#, Rrear 1990#
>
Dave's weights by wheel:

LF 2000#, RF 1875#, L Intermediate 2200#, R Intermediate 2,050#, Lrear
2200#, R rear 2050#

The Max Gross Vehicle Weight Restriction (GVWR) for a 1977 is 11,700 I
weighed in at 12,345 and while I was within tire load capacity I was way
over on axle capacities in the rear.

I would strongly urge every owner to have their coaches weighed,
by-the-wheel. Especially after they have done any major interior
reconfigurations.

John Anderson's A'Weigh WE Go, does this at FMCA national and area rallys
and it now costs about $30.00. Money well invested.

David Lee Greenberg
GMC Motorhome Registry
200 MacFarlane Drive
Delray Beach, FL 33483-6829
 
Boy you guys are tough still talking about using D rated tires, or is it
that I can't explain the problem correctly. Its not the weight limitation
of the tire that is the problem. Its the need for a full steel radial tire.
The GMC motorhome NEEDS a LT225/75R16 E rated full steel tire inflated to
80#, because of the enormous sidewall forces it produces. I made a mistake
before and went back and read my material, its 80# and not 75 Tests have
shown even within the GVW of the coach, individual wheel weights can exceed
3000 The eway everyone overloads their coaches, has malfunctioning air
suspension systems and tows toads who knows what the wheel weights will be.

Last word I am going to post on this subject. Everyone knows the rationale,
if you chose to still run D rated tires, bias ply, radial, sponge rubber
sidewalls, its your decision. Good luck.

>Thanks very much for posting your weights, Dave. I'm just going to have to
>make one of the 'meets' one day... now one more reason, though I'm almost
>chicken to weigh mine.
>
>But, this means to me that a Bridgestone (and probably most other LIGHT
>TRUCK tires) R265 with a D Load Rating seems adequate, perhaps even proper.
>
>Why proper? The R265 - D's tire load limit/cold inflation is listed as
>2335 and the E's as 2680 That would imply (to me at least) that a D
>is designed with my weight and pressure in mind while with the E I'm running
>at less than designed specs which sometimes has the reverse effect of what
>one thinks, in this case perhaps not necessarily and extra safety, etc
>unless run at the designed for 80 (BTW, my fronts are R265's E from an
>earlier bout/thread inflated to 65#)
>
>As Dave mentioned... you can't add more weight just because your tire is
>capable of it so are we overreacting a bit here? It may not be so much D vs
>E but to have a proper tire, period... i.e. what's referred to in the
>industry as a light truck tire.
>
>Still confused and befuddled...
>
>Heinz
>
>P.S. Pardon me if I added to the confusion in an earlier post. Did not mean
>to imply that by going the E/80# route that you can add more stuff to your
>GMC :-)
>
>
>>
>> Tom's weights by wheel:
>>
>> >LF 2190#, RF 2150#, Lintermediate 2090#, Rintermediate 2000#, Lrear
>> 2140#, Rrear 1990#
>> >
>> Dave's weights by wheel:
>>
>> LF 2000#, RF 1875#, L Intermediate 2200#, R Intermediate 2,050#, Lrear
>> 2200#, R rear 2050#
>>
>>
>> The Max Gross Vehicle Weight Restriction (GVWR) for a 1977 is 11,700 I
>> weighed in at 12,345 and while I was within tire load capacity I was way
>> over on axle capacities in the rear.
>>
>
>
>
>
Tom & Marg Warner
Vernon Center NY
1976 palmbeach
"The beautiful Mohawk Vally"
 
>
> Boy you guys are tough still talking about using D rated tires, or is it
> that I can't explain the problem correctly.

I've stayed out of this discussion until now because I doubt I have any
light to shed on the subject, but maybe I can provide some on the
discussion. Let me emphasize up front that I agree with the need for E
rated tires, however I am not yet sold on the need for steel sidewalls.

There are a couple of problems with the discussion of this subject which
tends to produce strong opinions all around. First, there are no
"facts" on this subject - only "opinions" and "data". Before you grab
that mouse to rebut, hear me out. Tires have "design strength" and
that's where the ratings come in. The tire companies' development
engineers put together a set of specifications(their opinion -
admittedly qualified) to produce a product which should have a given
strength. Samples of the product are then thoroughly tested to a point
beyond the design strength(sometimes to failure - often not) to validate
the design. It is patently impractical(not to mention absurd) to test a
tire to failure before you use it, therefore the "real" strength of your
tires is unknown - only their theoretical strength, the qualified
"opinion" of a group of engineers.

Now as to the data. There's anecdotal evidence on both sides of this
discussion, obviously contradictory. There's no immediate doom and
destruction that results from using D rated tires. We hear of failures
and then we get responses here from those who've had no problems. One
thing for sure, most modern tires have an amazing capacity to tolerate
abuse. My father's 76 came with D rated Generals and he's never had a
problem with them in 20,000 miles. The only trouble he's had was with
some Dunlops a local shop talked him into - four of the six suffered
tread separation(all on the rear, BTW) before he ditched the whole batch
and went back to Generals. I won't publish his inflation numbers as,
IMO they're underinflated for the sake of "ride comfort". My 73
also came with D rated Generals, which I've always run at 55 to 60psi
with no problems. A recent post mentioned something like 60% of coaches
at a rally arrived with underinflated tires. How many had tire failures
on the way? Few enough to count on one hand, if that, I'll wager.

Now, regarding the discussion. I have a twenty year career with the
largest employer of property loss prevention engineers in the insurance
industry. The vast majority of our professional staff began their
careers as LP engineers, including myself. I've spent the last fifteen
years in the production side of the business(the folks that pay the
bills and keep all these engineers employed). During this time I
listened to engineers cry "the sky will fall" and the feared result
never occurred, only to see us blindsided by something totally
unforeseen by either discipline(the reason that insurance exists).
Shouting "the sky will fall and doom, death and destruction will be
visited upon you and your house" does nothing to reinforce your
opinion. Remember, there are only "opinions" and "data" on this subject
and no "facts" that I can find. Eventually, all sides must resign
themselves to the fact(aha! there's one) that you will never
convince everyone of your opinion. So get over it - that's life! In
the twenty months we've had this forum, we've never come to an agreement
on tires and I don't expect one anytime soon.

Oh, my opinion on inflation pressure. IMO, tires mainly fail due to
impact damage, age(including wear and deterioration) and heat.
Underinflation/overloading results in overheating leading to failure.
Inflate for static load(plus a "safety" margin if you must) and the tire
should handle the transitory dynamic loads just fine.

And that's all I have to say about that(apologies to F. Gump),
Patrick
- --
Patrick Flowers
Mailto:patrick

The GMC Motorhome Page
http://www.gmcmotorhome.com
 
You are correct on one thing Patrick. You have added to the myth! But have
you taken the time to get copies of the publications that I referenced and
read the "facts" that were detailed before you weighted in?

Now that I have violated my own public vow of not speaking on the tire issue
any longer I will end with this. When the June issue of GMC motorhome News
and all of the "facts" are detailed, compare what you have said.

>>
>> Boy you guys are tough still talking about using D rated tires, or is it
>> that I can't explain the problem correctly.
>
>I've stayed out of this discussion until now because I doubt I have any
>light to shed on the subject, but maybe I can provide some on the
>discussion. Let me emphasize up front that I agree with the need for E
>rated tires, however I am not yet sold on the need for steel sidewalls.
>
>There are a couple of problems with the discussion of this subject which
>tends to produce strong opinions all around. First, there are no
>"facts" on this subject - only "opinions" and "data". Before you grab
>that mouse to rebut, hear me out. Tires have "design strength" and
>that's where the ratings come in. The tire companies' development
>engineers put together a set of specifications(their opinion -
>admittedly qualified) to produce a product which should have a given
>strength. Samples of the product are then thoroughly tested to a point
>beyond the design strength(sometimes to failure - often not) to validate
>the design. It is patently impractical(not to mention absurd) to test a
>tire to failure before you use it, therefore the "real" strength of your
>tires is unknown - only their theoretical strength, the qualified
>"opinion" of a group of engineers.
>
>Now as to the data. There's anecdotal evidence on both sides of this
>discussion, obviously contradictory. There's no immediate doom and
>destruction that results from using D rated tires. We hear of failures
>and then we get responses here from those who've had no problems. One
>thing for sure, most modern tires have an amazing capacity to tolerate
>abuse. My father's 76 came with D rated Generals and he's never had a
>problem with them in 20,000 miles. The only trouble he's had was with
>some Dunlops a local shop talked him into - four of the six suffered
>tread separation(all on the rear, BTW) before he ditched the whole batch
>and went back to Generals. I won't publish his inflation numbers as,
>IMO they're underinflated for the sake of "ride comfort". My 73
>also came with D rated Generals, which I've always run at 55 to 60psi
>with no problems. A recent post mentioned something like 60% of coaches
>at a rally arrived with underinflated tires. How many had tire failures
>on the way? Few enough to count on one hand, if that, I'll wager.
>
>Now, regarding the discussion. I have a twenty year career with the
>largest employer of property loss prevention engineers in the insurance
>industry. The vast majority of our professional staff began their
>careers as LP engineers, including myself. I've spent the last fifteen
>years in the production side of the business(the folks that pay the
>bills and keep all these engineers employed). During this time I
>listened to engineers cry "the sky will fall" and the feared result
>never occurred, only to see us blindsided by something totally
>unforeseen by either discipline(the reason that insurance exists).
>Shouting "the sky will fall and doom, death and destruction will be
>visited upon you and your house" does nothing to reinforce your
>opinion. Remember, there are only "opinions" and "data" on this subject
>and no "facts" that I can find. Eventually, all sides must resign
>themselves to the fact(aha! there's one) that you will never
>convince everyone of your opinion. So get over it - that's life! In
>the twenty months we've had this forum, we've never come to an agreement
>on tires and I don't expect one anytime soon.
>
>Oh, my opinion on inflation pressure. IMO, tires mainly fail due to
>impact damage, age(including wear and deterioration) and heat.
>Underinflation/overloading results in overheating leading to failure.
>Inflate for static load(plus a "safety" margin if you must) and the tire
>should handle the transitory dynamic loads just fine.
>
>And that's all I have to say about that(apologies to F. Gump),
>Patrick
>--
>Patrick Flowers
>Mailto:patrick
>
>The GMC Motorhome Page
>http://www.gmcmotorhome.com
>
>
>
>
Tom & Marg Warner
Vernon Center NY
1976 palmbeach
"The beautiful Mohawk Vally"
 
>
> Let me emphasize up front that I agree with the need for E
> rated tires, however I am not yet sold on the need for steel sidewalls.

> My 73 also came with D rated Generals, which I've always run at 55 to 60psi
> with no problems.

I wanted to reconcile the two apparently contradictory statements
above. I had no problems with the Generals, but replaced them last year
with E load range Bridgestones on Alcoa rims.

Patrick
- --
Patrick Flowers
Mailto:patrick

The GMC Motorhome Page
http://www.gmcmotorhome.com
 
At the risk of re-igniting a non-fire, I'd like to add just a bit more about the
tire issue. First, I wholeheartedly agree that our coaches need E-rated tires
for a comfortable safety margin. My Michelin LTX polyester sidewall tires are
E-rated.

Second, with the proper size tire, a coach can be supported with 40 psi or 80
psi. The 40 psi tire will squat down and present more square inches to the
pavement to support the weight (pressure times area equals force). The 80 psi
tire will rise up and present half the square inches to the pavement to support
the same weight.

For instance, and this may be a bit of over-simplification, a tire at 40 psi can
hold up 2,000 pounds with 50 square inches of contact. A 225/75R16 tire has a
tread width of 225 mm or 8.86 inches. 50 square inches then equals a tread
contact area of 8.86 in. wide by 5.64 in. long.

The same tire at 60 psi requires 33.3 square inches or 8.86 in. wide by 3.76 in.
long. At 80 psi the contact area would be 8.86 in. wide by 2.82 in. long.

I presume that the tire load/pressure ratings are based on what the engineers
consider the optimum contact area for best traction and durability, etc.

Nuf said.

Now, a little complaint. I don't have much free time to spend on the web. We
are receiving about 50 to 100 GMC messages a day. If I try to read them all,
it's usually at the expense of some precious sleep time. So I use the thread
titles to zero in on the ones I'm interested in. When a serious thread about
tires gets converted to a discussion about how to hang toilet paper, I get
ticked. We have a lot of valuable info on this Net and I appreciate that. But
sometimes messages get tacked on that don't add much of anything. In this case,
maybe somebody thought the discussion needed a little cooling down, so I'll cut
them a little slack. But please, lets stay on the topic or change the Subject.

Finally, I have no beef with Tom except he keeps misspelling my name

Clark Searle
Mt. Pleasant, MI
 
Anybody know if any tire manufacturer makes a LT 225/75R16 D rated all steel
tire?

>At the risk of re-igniting a non-fire, I'd like to add just a bit more
about the
>tire issue. First, I wholeheartedly agree that our coaches need E-rated tires
>for a comfortable safety margin. My Michelin LTX polyester sidewall tires are
>E-rated.
>
>Second, with the proper size tire, a coach can be supported with 40 psi or 80
>psi. The 40 psi tire will squat down and present more square inches to the
>pavement to support the weight (pressure times area equals force). The 80 psi
>tire will rise up and present half the square inches to the pavement to support
>the same weight.
>
>For instance, and this may be a bit of over-simplification, a tire at 40
psi can
>hold up 2,000 pounds with 50 square inches of contact. A 225/75R16 tire has a
>tread width of 225 mm or 8.86 inches. 50 square inches then equals a tread
>contact area of 8.86 in. wide by 5.64 in. long.
>
>The same tire at 60 psi requires 33.3 square inches or 8.86 in. wide by
3.76 in.
>long. At 80 psi the contact area would be 8.86 in. wide by 2.82 in. long.
>
>I presume that the tire load/pressure ratings are based on what the engineers
>consider the optimum contact area for best traction and durability, etc.
>
>Nuf said.
>
>Now, a little complaint. I don't have much free time to spend on the web. We
>are receiving about 50 to 100 GMC messages a day. If I try to read them all,
>it's usually at the expense of some precious sleep time. So I use the thread
>titles to zero in on the ones I'm interested in. When a serious thread about
>tires gets converted to a discussion about how to hang toilet paper, I get
>ticked. We have a lot of valuable info on this Net and I appreciate that. But
>sometimes messages get tacked on that don't add much of anything. In this
case,
>maybe somebody thought the discussion needed a little cooling down, so I'll cut
>them a little slack. But please, lets stay on the topic or change the Subject.
>
>Finally, I have no beef with Tom except he keeps misspelling my name
>
>Clark Searle
>Mt. Pleasant, MI
>
>
>
Tom & Marg Warner
Vernon Center NY
1976 palmbeach
"The beautiful Mohawk Vally"