Rick just one point. both the Bilsteins and the KYB shock eyes break off
occasionally for a very important reason. they were designed that way. it
is a safety valve so your suspension parts do not get damaged. When you hit
a bad bad pot hole, the only thing that restricts the suspension travel on a
GMC front end is the shock. If the shock eye does not break, your shock
mount or something worse will.
>
>> I'm still unclear how the KYB stack up to the highly touted Bilsteins.
>
>Richard,
> Like all (ex)mechanics, I'm opinionated. The following is an opinion, and
>so may or may not apply to you. ;-)
>
> I like KYBs. Sold many of them over the years. The company stands behind
>their warrantee, but finding a dealer to make the swap can sometimes be
>difficult. I have a set on my '88 4-Runner. At 50,000 miles, they're
>feeling just about worn out. Of those I sold, I'd guess about 20% failed in
>the first 2 years. So they're good, but don't last forever. Good value for
>the money though.
>
> The Caspro shocks are, as Tom suggests, just conventional twin-tube
>shocks, albeit really heavy-duty ones. Their sheer physical strength is
>tempting (apparently Bilstein's have been known to break an end off), but
>that's about all. Their claims of superiority due to having the proper
>reversed valving for our rear suspension is bogus: so do (most all) the
>competitors. I haven't tried them, but suspect they would do the job.
>
> There's nothing exotic about tailoring shock valving to the application.
>For years stock passenger car shocks were 30/70 (30% of their resistance on
>compression for softness on bumps, 70% on rebound to damp oscillation.
>Performance/sports cars used 50/50 valving for firm control, and drag racers
>used special 90/10 front shock to allow the front end to rise to full height
>immediately (for better weight transfer to the rear wheels), with the 90%
>compression resistance keeping it up there. Our rear shocks simply need
>something like 70/30 or 60/40 valving, simple for any manufacturer who makes
>shocks specifically for the GMC.
>
> Myself, I like Bilsteins. Original equipment on Mercedes and some other
>pricey cars, they have a reputation for long life (usually well over 100,000
>miles). The company seems to stand behind them. They were first to produce
>the DeCarbonne monotube gas-pressure shock, and have been building them for
>so long there are very few if any bugs left. They ride beautifully on my
>GMC, and I've never experienced a hint of wheel hop or bouncing. For more
>detail, see Wes Caughlan's article in GMC Motorhome News, March 1998.
>
> Whatever you do, don't get some generic shock like a Monroe. I've seen
>them fail totally in under 15,000 miles.
>
>Rick Staples
>'75 Eleganza
>Louisville, CO
>
>
Tom & Marg Warner
Vernon Center NY
1976 palmbeach
"The beautiful Mohawk Vally"