New MSD EFI

wayne rogewski

New member
Jul 24, 2014
413
0
0
Just seeing of anyone has run this system, or if there are any thoughts from the braintrust here. It looks as if the MSD system is similar to
Fitech. Same principle anyway. 1300 bucks or so with a fuel pump.

I noted that the MSD does not require a return fuel line. No fuel command center unit. Just run a high pressure fuel pump and its supposed to be
good to go.

https://www.msdperformance.com/products/fuel_systems/atomic_efi/atomic_efi_tbi/parts/2910

Same/similar arguments with timing control.

Just wondering if anyone on this board is running this system or not. I dont do facebook but understand there may be some discussion on it. MSD
has been around a while so Im wondering what the thoughts are on the system.

Thanks in advance.
--
77 Royale, Rear Dry Bath. 403, 3.55 Final Drive, Lenzi goodies, Patterson carb and dizzy.
Mid Michigan
 
I don't have any personal experience, but I know Miguel Mendez has installed quite a few of them and is a big fan. You might give him a call.
--
Carl Stouffer
'75 ex Palm Beach
Tucson, AZ.
Chuck Aulgur Reaction Arm Disc Brakes, Quadrabags, 3.70 LSD final drive, Lenzi knuckles/hubs, Dodge Truck 16" X 8" front wheels, Rear American Eagles,
Solar battery charging. GMCSJ and GMCMI member
 
Miguel has quit installing FiTech and recommends the MSD very highly.
http://mgmgmc.net/

bdub

> Just seeing of anyone has run this system, or if there are any thoughts
> from the braintrust here. It looks as if the MSD system is similar to
> Fitech. Same principle anyway. 1300 bucks or so with a fuel pump.
>
> I noted that the MSD does not require a return fuel line. No fuel
> command center unit. Just run a high pressure fuel pump and its supposed
> to be
> good to go.
>
> https://www.msdperformance.com/products/fuel_systems/
> atomic_efi/atomic_efi_tbi/parts/2910
>
>
> Same/similar arguments with timing control.
>
> Just wondering if anyone on this board is running this system or not. I
> dont do facebook but understand there may be some discussion on it. MSD
> has been around a while so Im wondering what the thoughts are on the
> system.
>
 
Miguel and I use the return line as it helps to keep the unit cooler ad
maintains better pressure control.
We hae sold quite a lot as they are approved for California Air Resources
Board (CARB)

> Miguel has quit installing FiTech and recommends the MSD very highly.
> http://mgmgmc.net/
>
> bdub
>
>

>
> > Just seeing of anyone has run this system, or if there are any thoughts
> > from the braintrust here. It looks as if the MSD system is similar to
> > Fitech. Same principle anyway. 1300 bucks or so with a fuel pump.
> >
> > I noted that the MSD does not require a return fuel line. No fuel
> > command center unit. Just run a high pressure fuel pump and its supposed
> > to be
> > good to go.
> >
> > https://www.msdperformance.com/products/fuel_systems/
> > atomic_efi/atomic_efi_tbi/parts/2910
> >
> >
> > Same/similar arguments with timing control.
> >
> > Just wondering if anyone on this board is running this system or not. I
> > dont do facebook but understand there may be some discussion on it.
> MSD
> > has been around a while so Im wondering what the thoughts are on the
> > system.
> >
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>

--
Jim Kanomata
Applied/GMC, Newark,CA
jimk
http://www.appliedgmc.com
1-800-752-7502
 
Like the Fitec, MSD does not give you better economy like the Howel based
unit with the EBL .

> Miguel and I use the return line as it helps to keep the unit cooler ad
> maintains better pressure control.
> We hae sold quite a lot as they are approved for California Air Resources
> Board (CARB)
>

>
>> Miguel has quit installing FiTech and recommends the MSD very highly.
>> http://mgmgmc.net/
>>
>> bdub
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 10:20 AM, Wayne Rogewski

>>
>> > Just seeing of anyone has run this system, or if there are any thoughts
>> > from the braintrust here. It looks as if the MSD system is similar to
>> > Fitech. Same principle anyway. 1300 bucks or so with a fuel pump.
>> >
>> > I noted that the MSD does not require a return fuel line. No fuel
>> > command center unit. Just run a high pressure fuel pump and its
>> supposed
>> > to be
>> > good to go.
>> >
>> > https://www.msdperformance.com/products/fuel_systems/
>> > atomic_efi/atomic_efi_tbi/parts/2910
>> >
>> >
>> > Same/similar arguments with timing control.
>> >
>> > Just wondering if anyone on this board is running this system or not. I
>> > dont do facebook but understand there may be some discussion on it.
>> MSD
>> > has been around a while so Im wondering what the thoughts are on the
>> > system.
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> GMCnet mailing list
>> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
>> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Jim Kanomata
> Applied/GMC, Newark,CA
> jimk
> http://www.appliedgmc.com
> 1-800-752-7502
>

--
Jim Kanomata
Applied/GMC, Newark,CA
jimk
http://www.appliedgmc.com
1-800-752-7502
 
I've an MSD installed by Miguel on my coach. It has an outboard pressure regulator and return line which is plumbed into the filler neck. Positive
points so far, Walks over elevations without histrionics... keeps the mixture stochiometric or close regardless of altitude; cranks up instanter,
even after sittingand a weak battery (I left the 12V supply unplugged.) Not quite so good points - which I don't think are MSD specific - The
engine's noisier because there's just a plastic bonnet over the throttle body which hasn't a lot of soundproofing; I don't get decent mileage. As I
say, these aren't MSD specific, more soundproofing and some time playing with the system tuner should help both.
Given that the system has some high pressure fule lines, I consider a foam extinguisher essential. I've a FireFight bolted to the bak of the hatch
opening. The lines are new and good, but who knows what might make one leak.

--johnny
--
76 26' Eleganza(?) with beaucoup mods and add - ons.
Braselton, Ga.
"I forgive them all, save those who hurt the dogs. They must answer to me in hell" - ol Andy, paraphrased
 
After reading the MSD manual and reviews on the web,
A big plus for the MSD is that you can make real time adjustments on the handheld controller while driving. I believe with the Fitech you have to pull
over, turn off the ignition, wait a few seconds, restart, enter the new adjustment, then drive. And only one adjustment at a time.

As with all the throttle body EFI's(except the Howell EBL), I don't think they are designed to give any better MPG, unless you have a badly tuned
carburetor. Just better performance.

The complaints seem to be less with the MSD from the reviews I've read.

Scott.

--
Scott Nutter
1978 Royale Center Kitchen, Patterson 455, switch pitch tranny, 3.21 final drive, Quad bags, tankless water heater, everything Lenzi.
Houston, Texas
 
And to add more confusion, Just got off the phone with Summit racing customer service. They swear by the Fitech, but sell the MSD also..........

I guess it's the old apples to oranges comparison. But the MSD is California compliant. Fitech will soon be.
--
Scott Nutter
1978 Royale Center Kitchen, Patterson 455, switch pitch tranny, 3.21 final drive, Quad bags, tankless water heater, everything Lenzi.
Houston, Texas
 
Appreciate the comments thus far. It may be worth adding the thought process behind this possible switch. Each owner may want different things and
have different expectations.

The concerns or things Im looking to mitigate in no particular order: potential for Vapor Lock, Exhaust Smell, reliability overall, warm up times.

I currently have a low mile Patterson rebuilt carb and distributor. The system works very well, and Dick was nice enough to help adjust the carb and
give a once over in Elkhart. Im not sure its going to get better than where it is currently.

My concerns with the current system are that the coach takes a while to warm up and the exhaust is pretty stinky. Having the rebuilt carb tuned has
helped with the exhaust smell a lot, but not all the way. I dont have any expectations that the GMC will ever smell like a new car when running, but
anything helps. Perhaps EFI will help some more.

Warm up times are not an issue when Im home. We mostly camp at normal campgrounds, and I try to be a good neighbor and as considerate as possible.
Warming up the coach for 5 mins or longer on a cold morning, coupled with the smell and actual noise of the running engine I think has gotten to some
of our camping neighbors. (no we are not at a high brow campground, Yes, I have two working new mufflers that are not race style and dont leak) No
its not as loud as the 25 super diesels that are also there camping, but I dont want to be "that guy". No I dont expect to leave a campsite in total
silence either. But if I can start the engine and roll sooner, then that's great. Perhaps EFI will help some more. (I also dont expect to turn
they key and floor the gas to tear out of any place).

Ive never experienced vapor lock, but truth be told, when we are underway, I rarely shut the engine down until Im there. In reading about the EFI
experiences of several GMCers. Running a return line, and keeping as much fuel line away from anything producing heat seems like its both reasonable
and effective at better controlling or eliminating this condition. Having the fuel lines run behind the engine from the tanks to feed the EFI seems
like a better set up temperature wise, than the OEM steel line running in front of everything, then through the mechanical pump, then up to the front
of the Carb. As I understand it, EFI should help with this condition.

Fuel Pumps. Ive probably read every horror story and success story on pumps on this forum. Some pumps seem better, some worse, all will fail at some
point, just be prepared for it. I have a new, proper mechanical carter pump installed, and also a new spare in the coach just in case. Im not so
much worried about one going out, but more that the diaphragm lets go and dumps fuel in the crank case. I had that happen on an engine once. Didn't
do too much damage overall, but properly disposing of 10+ quarts of gassy oil was a pain, plus flushing the engine. I cant imagine doing that on the
side of the road in the GMC. Seems like changing a bad electric fuel pump mounted outside the tank would be a bit easier than on the side of a hot
engine. Perhaps the EFI high pressure pump would be "better" from a change out perspective but not necessarily more reliable. At least expect for it
to fail, hope it doesnt, and carry a spare and move on with life.

Also in the reliability area is if something tanks, or gives up. The reality is if the carb fouls up, and you cant fix it, it could be some time
before replacement carbs, someone that knows what they are actually doing, or replacement parts can be found and shipped to your location, and again
if you dont know what your doing, finding someone who does close by. So your off the road for a while waiting. If the EFI tanks, and you know its
not the pump, just assume its the entire unit. Same thing, your off the road, however you will find a new replacement unit faster, and in some cases
shipped to you probably the same day. Unplug the electrical connections, and fuel lines, pull, drop new one in, plug in and go. So if I had to
pick between a carb going south or EFI I may prefer the EFI route for the time involved to replace. Im not suggesting that 900 to 1000 bucks is a
throw away unit, but correctly rebuilt carbs are several hundred as well, or more if your current carb cant be used as a core.

I suppose thats where my thinking is. and I know Ive missed other valid concerns.

The MPG as has been mentioned is not that big of a deal. Im not expecting or looking for any gains. As it stands we do not drive a ton of miles to
really appreciate a few extra gallons of gas here and there. Our time off, and time with the family is the most valuable part of every minute in the
coach. I found driving as if there is an egg covering the gas pedal helps, keeping it under 65mph and having empty holding tanks (grey, black, and
fresh) are pretty helpful.

Perhaps there is more discussion on the merits/de merits of this system, or maybe I just further talked my self into this, but I appreciate the
knowledge on this forum.

--
77 Royale, Rear Dry Bath. 403, 3.55 Final Drive, Lenzi goodies, Patterson carb and dizzy.
Mid Michigan
 
Wayne,
If the choke is set correctly, there is no need to warm up the engine.
By driving it slowly for the first mile or two will heat the engine rapidly
and is easier on the engine wear.
In my book warming up a endine by idleing is a por practise

> Appreciate the comments thus far. It may be worth adding the thought
> process behind this possible switch. Each owner may want different things
> and
> have different expectations.
>
> The concerns or things Im looking to mitigate in no particular order:
> potential for Vapor Lock, Exhaust Smell, reliability overall, warm up
> times.
>
> I currently have a low mile Patterson rebuilt carb and distributor. The
> system works very well, and Dick was nice enough to help adjust the carb and
> give a once over in Elkhart. Im not sure its going to get better than
> where it is currently.
>
> My concerns with the current system are that the coach takes a while to
> warm up and the exhaust is pretty stinky. Having the rebuilt carb tuned
> has
> helped with the exhaust smell a lot, but not all the way. I dont have any
> expectations that the GMC will ever smell like a new car when running, but
> anything helps. Perhaps EFI will help some more.
>
> Warm up times are not an issue when Im home. We mostly camp at normal
> campgrounds, and I try to be a good neighbor and as considerate as possible.
> Warming up the coach for 5 mins or longer on a cold morning, coupled with
> the smell and actual noise of the running engine I think has gotten to some
> of our camping neighbors. (no we are not at a high brow campground, Yes,
> I have two working new mufflers that are not race style and dont leak) No
> its not as loud as the 25 super diesels that are also there camping, but I
> dont want to be "that guy". No I dont expect to leave a campsite in total
> silence either. But if I can start the engine and roll sooner, then
> that's great. Perhaps EFI will help some more. (I also dont expect to
> turn
> they key and floor the gas to tear out of any place).
>
> Ive never experienced vapor lock, but truth be told, when we are underway,
> I rarely shut the engine down until Im there. In reading about the EFI
> experiences of several GMCers. Running a return line, and keeping as much
> fuel line away from anything producing heat seems like its both reasonable
> and effective at better controlling or eliminating this condition.
> Having the fuel lines run behind the engine from the tanks to feed the EFI
> seems
> like a better set up temperature wise, than the OEM steel line running in
> front of everything, then through the mechanical pump, then up to the front
> of the Carb. As I understand it, EFI should help with this condition.
>
> Fuel Pumps. Ive probably read every horror story and success story on
> pumps on this forum. Some pumps seem better, some worse, all will fail at
> some
> point, just be prepared for it. I have a new, proper mechanical carter
> pump installed, and also a new spare in the coach just in case. Im not so
> much worried about one going out, but more that the diaphragm lets go and
> dumps fuel in the crank case. I had that happen on an engine once. Didn't
> do too much damage overall, but properly disposing of 10+ quarts of gassy
> oil was a pain, plus flushing the engine. I cant imagine doing that on the
> side of the road in the GMC. Seems like changing a bad electric fuel pump
> mounted outside the tank would be a bit easier than on the side of a hot
> engine. Perhaps the EFI high pressure pump would be "better" from a
> change out perspective but not necessarily more reliable. At least expect
> for it
> to fail, hope it doesnt, and carry a spare and move on with life.
>
> Also in the reliability area is if something tanks, or gives up. The
> reality is if the carb fouls up, and you cant fix it, it could be some time
> before replacement carbs, someone that knows what they are actually doing,
> or replacement parts can be found and shipped to your location, and again
> if you dont know what your doing, finding someone who does close by. So
> your off the road for a while waiting. If the EFI tanks, and you know its
> not the pump, just assume its the entire unit. Same thing, your off the
> road, however you will find a new replacement unit faster, and in some cases
> shipped to you probably the same day. Unplug the electrical connections,
> and fuel lines, pull, drop new one in, plug in and go. So if I had to
> pick between a carb going south or EFI I may prefer the EFI route for the
> time involved to replace. Im not suggesting that 900 to 1000 bucks is a
> throw away unit, but correctly rebuilt carbs are several hundred as well,
> or more if your current carb cant be used as a core.
>
> I suppose thats where my thinking is. and I know Ive missed other valid
> concerns.
>
> The MPG as has been mentioned is not that big of a deal. Im not
> expecting or looking for any gains. As it stands we do not drive a ton of
> miles to
> really appreciate a few extra gallons of gas here and there. Our time off,
> and time with the family is the most valuable part of every minute in the
> coach. I found driving as if there is an egg covering the gas pedal
> helps, keeping it under 65mph and having empty holding tanks (grey, black,
> and
> fresh) are pretty helpful.
>
> Perhaps there is more discussion on the merits/de merits of this system,
> or maybe I just further talked my self into this, but I appreciate the
> knowledge on this forum.
>
>
>
>
> --
> 77 Royale, Rear Dry Bath. 403, 3.55 Final Drive, Lenzi goodies, Patterson
> carb and dizzy.
> Mid Michigan
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>

--
Jim Kanomata
Applied/GMC, Newark,CA
jimk
http://www.appliedgmc.com
1-800-752-7502
 
Warren,

I completely agree with JimK. If you can't make the engine pull the coach after about 30 seconds, your choke calibration is wrong. The fact that the
exhaust stinks would also indicate this. Nothing good happens to an idling engine. These days I am kind of busy, but when I get through my current
big tasks (or if parts don't come in) I could show up there and give a hand getting the cold calibration right.

Matt
--
Matt & Mary Colie - '73 Glacier 23 - Members GMCMI, GMCGL, GMCES
Electronically Controlled Quiet Engine Cooling Fan
OE Rear Drum Brakes with Applied Control Arms
SE Michigan - Twixt A2 and Detroit
 
I can tell youb that when I take a coach to pass smog, if it smells , I
know it will not pass.
Sometimes a lean at idle will not pass as there will not be enough gas
molicules for the spark to ignite the mixture.

> Warren,
>
> I completely agree with JimK. If you can't make the engine pull the coach
> after about 30 seconds, your choke calibration is wrong. The fact that the
> exhaust stinks would also indicate this. Nothing good happens to an
> idling engine. These days I am kind of busy, but when I get through my
> current
> big tasks (or if parts don't come in) I could show up there and give a
> hand getting the cold calibration right.
>
> Matt
> --
> Matt & Mary Colie - '73 Glacier 23 - Members GMCMI, GMCGL, GMCES
> Electronically Controlled Quiet Engine Cooling Fan
> OE Rear Drum Brakes with Applied Control Arms
> SE Michigan - Twixt A2 and Detroit
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>

--
Jim Kanomata
Applied/GMC, Newark,CA
jimk
http://www.appliedgmc.com
1-800-752-7502
 
Warren,
I think you are absolutely correct on your train of thought for the EFI. It seems to be a cleaner and potentially better system all together. And I
think modern fuels are designed with fuel injection in mind.
I'm going that route, 90% sure it will be Fitech. With no distributor control and no fuel command module. Just a easy to get to fuel pump.
Scott.
--
Scott Nutter
1978 Royale Center Kitchen, Patterson 455, switch pitch tranny, 3.21 final drive, Quad bags, tankless water heater, everything Lenzi.
Houston, Texas
 
Thats one of the things I was looking for, If anyone has switched to EFI, did that make a difference with the exhaust smell? This would make the co
pilots very happy.

As for the choke settings and Choke. I switched to an electric with the Patterson rebuild, and Mr. Patterson personally adjusted it while the engine
was cold. He also made some adjustments to the mixture screws while running and with a vacuum gauge attached. and verified the correct vacuum hoses
were connected where they were supposed to be. Super nice guy to meet and chat with in person.

Im a bit hesitant to undo or modify the adjustments he made.

My main reason for the engine to warm up as long as I do is to make sure the ATF has a chance to get to where it needs to before asking the trans to
do some work. Perhaps that's not good practice? The other thing I do while the engine is warming up is a full walk around. All the lights on and
working, is the LP tank off, is the shore power cord unplugged and stowed. Do the turn signals work, is there anything at all leaking, dripping or
pouring out from under the coach, including holding tanks. Are there any new puddles where there shouldn't be. Is the awning secured, Is the
campfire out, have I left the campsite cleaner than when I found it. Are bikes secured, Do I hear any new noises that need to be looked at right now.
etc.
--
77 Royale, Rear Dry Bath. 403, 3.55 Final Drive, Lenzi goodies, Patterson carb and dizzy.
Mid Michigan
 
> Warren,
> I think you are absolutely correct on your train of thought for the EFI. It seems to be a cleaner and potentially better system all together. And
> I think modern fuels are designed with fuel injection in mind.
> I'm going that route, 90% sure it will be Fitech. With no distributor control and no fuel command module. Just a easy to get to fuel pump.
> Scott.

Scott,
I have a Fitech on my Cad 500 and really like the way it handles fuel demands. There are some things that the FiTech "Set Up" and "Quick Start Guide"
do not cover. So I went on line to some of the forums that address Fitech issues, for answers. One of the themes that I have seen is problems with
the Fuel Command Center. One of the solutions to those problems has been , instead of using the FCC, the mounting on the frame of a high pressure pump
as low as possible and as close as possible to the fuel tanks. Some who have done this have experienced a LOT of noise coming from the pump. I
experienced this when running a port injection EBL system. The warmer it got outside the louder the "screaming" coming from the pump. I finally took
the pump out and replaced the system with high pressure pumps in the tanks and fuel pressure regulator on the frame next to the forward tank with
return directly to the Aux tank. Noise gone, and now have a backup pump (in the second tank) in case one goes bad. Just for what it is worth, look
closely at pumps in the tanks instead of frame mounted. JMHO

On a side note, FiTech (the company) will be doing a session at the spring GMCMI convention in Tucson. Might be a good time to talk personally with
them about your situation.
--
Larry
78 Royale w/500 Caddy
Menomonie, WI.
 
I'm a bit biased to the EBL because I have had it for 7 years. However hfom reading manuals and reviews on the newer systems out there now, I would
go EBL again.

EBL is a modern electronics Flash-based Engine Control Module (ECM) that replaces a GM stock ECM found on the Howell EFI system and others. You can
add it to a Howell system, or roll your own using a TBI and sensors from the Men's Mall. There are a couple good write-ups from Club tech pages.

One thing I'd like to point out first is that EBL is self learning. On top of that there is a community of GMCer's who have already setup the EBL, so
all you need is to request a file and dump it into your EBL and you are set to go!.

Some pros of the EBL:
-Uses a GM or Holley Throttle body so injectors and sensors are readily available at any Auto Parts stores.
-Many of these new bolt-on systems are wholly designed in house. They use their own sensors, injectors etc. If something fails you might be
sitting there while you send it back to the manufacturer and wait for it to come back or buy a whole new unit.

-You can optionally add a Vehicle Speed Sensor (VSS). This will give you fuel saving features such as:
-Lean Cruise (leans the mixture to about 16:1 when cruising and the engine is under light load)
-Deceleration Fuel Cut Off (DFCO, cuts the fuel to the engine when you take your foot off the gas, coasting down a hill etc)

-Spark Control using a standard GM ESC distributor, so readily available parts. ESC is what really wakes your engine up. Spark advance is controlled
by a number of parameters with knock sensor feed-back. In lean-cruise mode, additional spark advance is added to compensate for the slow burn of a
lean mixture.

-Multiple fueling/spark setups (Bin files).
-The EBL can handle upto 8 different operational settings, selectable on the go. So you can have one setup optimized for power for climbing
mountains, or economy in the flat-lands.

-Electronics are housed inside the cabin.
-Sure there are electronic components that are rated for higher operating temperatures than there was 20 years ago. But I can tell you after 45
years in the electronics field that heat reduces the life of electronic components. The higher the temperature rating of the component, the higher
its cost. Military and Aerospace can require and justify the cost for high spec components, but I don't think a $700 EFI system can justify a $300
microprocessor.
-When you are running down the road, the airflow through the TBI will cool its housing. Pull in to fuel-up after a long run on the hyway with the
engine heat-soak and headers cooling, no airflow and sitting on top of the engine what do you think the temperature will rise to? The components
dissipate heat as well so they are running hotter than the temperature of the TBI.

Just my 2 cents,

--
Bruce Hislop
ON Canada
77PB, 455 Dick P. rebuilt, DynamicEFI EBL EFI & ESC.1 ton front end
http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/showphoto.php?photo=29001
My Staff says I never listen to them, or something like that
 
Larry, thanks and I completely agree that the in tank pumps would be the ultimate setup.
I just don't want to get into the tank project at this time. But if the EFI system works out, I could see installing the tank pumps in the next 18
months or so. Probably right before I put in the new carpet. So I can put in a couple of access ports in the floor for easy replacement of the tank
pumps if needed in the future.
Scott.
--
Scott Nutter
1978 Royale Center Kitchen, Patterson 455, switch pitch tranny, 3.21 final drive, Quad bags, tankless water heater, everything Lenzi.
Houston, Texas