New GMC Forum

I went to a rally at Coos bay several years ago which was the second (and
final) rally I attended. My take.
The people were very social and excited to explain/show all aspects of
their gmcs. This was a huge positive.
The cost of the rally included a couple meals and a spot in the parking lot
to “camp”. The meals just plain were not good. At all. I ended up spending
most of my time at the nearby dunes because myself and my son had dirt
bikes and we went and hung out with another gmcer and his wife. This couple
was closest in age to me (slightly younger, I am 51 right now) and we had
more in common with them outside of gmc life. We rode bikes spun lies and
had a great time.

For the provided amenities (was nice to have a shower since the interior of
The War Pig was gutted on this trip) the daily cost of the rally would have
been decent if the food was good which it was not.

My 2 c.

Sully
Bellevue wa

On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 12:53 PM Ben via Gmclist
wrote:

> Les Burt[1

> > While I understand and respect your opinion and reasoning, one big
> problem is the newcomers are not coming to GMCnet. Your desire to help is
> not
> > reaching the majority of those that need it the most. As has been
> discussed many times in the recent past, main reason is the GMCnet is not
> > user-friendly to them. Most of the older members here grew up with this
> platform, so we don't necessarily see what the younger crowd is having
> > difficulty with.
> >
> > I too am concerned about changing to a new address. Updating and
> improving GMCnet would be much wiser, but the owner seems to be resistant
> and so
> > are many of the members. What we need to sort out is what GMCnet's
> priority should be. Future growth and sustainability with the main
> objective of
> > supporting All TZE owners, or support of it aging gurus who don't see
> the need to change what works.
> >
> >
> > Les Burt
> > Montreal
> > '75 Eleganza 26'
> >
> >

> > >
> > > I guess I may be getting set in my ways but I don't see a need to
> completely switch to a new site. In fact, if we do that I may just drop out
> > > and spend my time elsewhere. I have a lot of other things I can do
> with the years I may have left.
> > >
> > > I have been posting since almost the beginning of this site. At this
> point I mostly post to provide information to other, mostly newer,
> > > owners.
> > >
> > > If any other long time users feel the same way, I can see the
> impending end of this valuable site.
> > >
> > > Emery Stora
> > > 77 Kingsley
> > > Frederick CO
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > GMCnet mailing list
> > > Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> > > http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > GMCnet mailing list
> > Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> > http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
> I'd like to offer an angle on what Mr. Burt said.
>
> I'm 38, with a family, and a new owner.
>
> My generation of owners faces three issues - none of them relating to
> access to technical information, which this site is.
>
> And thinking of it now, a new forum - maybe a complementary one - could
> help out a little.
>
> 1: Price vs. Value
>
> Economy has changed. These coaches are priced entirely on value.
> Rationally, 80% of them should come with an envelope with 20K in cash just
> to get the
> inside normal and the wiring stock. That's not going to happen. There is a
> vanishing minority of coaches worth the asking prices; the best of the rest
> are vaguely road-worthy, and the majority simply not a good proposition to
> a family.
>
> 2: Outreach. The local club, of which I attended two meetings,
> is....insular. Nice folks. Can't remember a name. Sat at the table and was
> ignored.
> Twice.
>
> There is a huge opportunity to reengage with families, campgrounds,
> rallies....if some effort is made to just say "Hi. What do your kids like
> doing
> and how could we make our rallies more attractive"?
>
> Vintage is huge. Americana is huge. Return to family values is huge.
> Advertise and identify as that and people will come.
>
> Right now the community is a late-eighties Never-Never land. Sorry if
> that's rude. I love this place. But you're advertising (sort of) a retired
> lifestyle to people who want to take their young families and grow them on
> the road in the Coaches. It's a wrong angle if you want to grow a new base.
>
>
> 3: A decent, modern, drop-in re-engine option. Not one that pleases the
> gearheads and wizards and the conservatives. One that will turn on and run
> like a suburban.
> My generation does not have the mechanical and engineering grounding most
> of the current owner base does.
>
> It's not that it's too technical. These are simple machines. It's that the
> discussion of the tech has become impenetrable and opinion-oriented. Which
> adds even further to the sense of confusion your average new owner will
> feel when asking "What does it take to get this running right?"
>
>
> This went further than I thought it would, and I basically pulled a 180, I
> realize. But after thinking about what it took to find and buy a good coach
> that wasn't a total reno or a total pile, I shifted. This place could
> benefit from a little more air.
>
>
> - Respectfully
>
>
>
> --
> “There he goes. One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some
> kind never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and
> too rare to die.”
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
 
I looked at the new site and bookmarked it. It looks complicated to me. I'm 63 and used to consider myself young, but I'm beginning to wonder.
After 11 years of GMC ownership, I graduated from using email to using this forum and I'm used to it. I agree it is hard to find something specific
in the search, but then again...I'm used to it. I post pics using the GMC photo site. Not a big deal.

I appreciate the effort being put into it, and I will probably, eventually sign up for it and maybe occasionally contribute, but this will likely
continue to be my main source of advice and knowledge about my GMC.
--
Carl Stouffer
'75 ex Palm Beach
Tucson, AZ.
Chuck Aulgur Reaction Arm Disc Brakes, Quadrabags, 3.70 LSD final drive, Lenzi knuckles/hubs, Dodge Truck 16" X 8" front wheels, Rear American Eagles,
Solar battery charging. GMCSJ and GMCMI member
 
Emery,

I see the need to clarify what was said.

1st,
I’m not trying to pick a fight, so please, no need to take such a defensive position. Everyone should have the freedom to share their thoughts and opinions, as long as they remain polite and respectful.

2nd,
I’m not the one trying or even suggesting we move everything to another site. I am suggesting we make improvements. I honestly don’t have a big preference as to how that is accomplished. Like many here, I have had success using our existing GMCnet and the other supporting sites of data and info.

3rd,
I did not say that GMCnet ONLY supports its “aging Gurus”. I did imply that if GMCnet does not adapt, it is headed that way with regards to the average age of its membership. I wasn’t implying that members give or receive different support based on age.

I’ve been around here long enough to know who the big contributors are, and I very much appreciate their efforts. I may not express my gratitude as flamboyantly as some, but I am grateful. And yes Emery, you have directly, and indirectly provided many answers and solutions to me over the years. I thank you for that.

I am concerned about the future security and accessibility of all the valuable TZE related data, knowledge and friendships that have been amassed here, and on our various other TZE related sites. Much of that value could be lost if we don’t encourage newcomers to use and support it.

As to my statement
“one big problem is the newcomers are not coming to GMCnet. “

I collected that info from various previous GMCnet discussions. It was not a quote, but rather a formed opinion based on discussions right here on GMCnet.

Recent discussions here covered how GMCnet is quirky and needs improvements. The newcomer who raised those comments was told by multiple members that perhaps he should make the effort to build a better website on his own if he is so dissatisfied with this one. There have been similar discussions in the past.

Billy has announced here more than once that Facebook membership has been growing substantially. As a member here, i do see the GMCnet newcomers, but they aren’t busting down the doors.

I also follow the Facebook groups and read the comments. When the suggestion is made that members visit GMCnet, the response is often that we are not user friendly, and many give up after having difficulty sifting through the many dis-organized/broken threads of info. The lack of photo embedding capability is also a frustration to them.

Facebook may not be the ideal place, but it still appeals to the younger crowd. Partly due to easy ability to embed photos. Refinements and improvements GMCnet would go a long way towards bringing more of those people over here.

One last observation. I find it interesting how many GMC owners frequently promote partipation in the various GMC Rallies and gatherings. Often I hear how it is so enjoyable to meet with old friends and make new friends. How the rallies are valuable sources of info and assistance. I also hear how important it is for the new, younger owners to get involved as they are our future. In recent times, many rally organizers have sat down to discuss their declining participation and how they can adapt in order to survive.

Shouldn’t that thinking also apply to our online facilities?

Les Burt
Montreal
'75 Eleganza 26'

>
> On what do you base your statement that “one big problem is the newcomers are not coming to GMCnet. “
>
> Do you have any facts to support that or is that just your “feeling”?
>
> Also how can you say that this site is not supporting all TZE owners but only “aging gurus”? I seem to recall providing information to you a few times.
>
> If the owner of the site doesn’t see the need to change how do you plan to move all the content of the site to another one? Could that be called theft?
>
> Emery Stora
> 77 Kingsley
> Frederick CO
>

>>
>> Emery,
>> While I understand and respect your opinion and reasoning, one big problem is the newcomers are not coming to GMCnet. Your desire to help is not reaching the majority of those that need it the most. As has been discussed many times in the recent past, main reason is the GMCnet is not user-friendly to them. Most of the older members here grew up with this platform, so we don’t necessarily see what the younger crowd is having difficulty with.
>>
>> I too am concerned about changing to a new address. Updating and improving GMCnet would be much wiser, but the owner seems to be resistant and so are many of the members. What we need to sort out is what GMCnet’s priority should be. Future growth and sustainability with the main objective of supporting All TZE owners, or support of it aging gurus who don’t see the need to change what works.
>>
>>
>> Les Burt
>> Montreal
>> '75 Eleganza 26'
>>
>>

>>>
>>> I guess I may be getting set in my ways but I don’t see a need to completely switch to a new site. In fact, if we do that I may just drop out and spend my time elsewhere. I have a lot of other things I can do with the years I may have left.
>>>
>>> I have been posting since almost the beginning of this site. At this point I mostly post to provide information to other, mostly newer, owners.
>>>
>>> If any other long time users feel the same way, I can see the impending end of this valuable site.
>>>
>>> Emery Stora
>>> 77 Kingsley
>>> Frederick CO
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> GMCnet mailing list
>>> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
>>> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> GMCnet mailing list
>> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
>> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
 
>
> I am also truly wondering what issues make many of us so resistant to improving GMCNET to make it more attractive to our newer owners? This is a subject that really needs more focus and discussion so we can choose the right path.
>
>
> Les Burt
> Montreal
> '75 Eleganza 26'
>
>

Les
instead of just making statements that it needs changes to make it attractive to our newer owners why don’t you give some detail as to what changes you feel are needed to
make it more attractive. So far I have seen statements that just seem to be opinions without any facts to back up the opinions.

It's easy to say lest make changes — much harder to give reasons why and to give information to back it up.

Emery Stora
77 Kingsley
Frederick, CO
 
Emery,
While I agree with you to a point, it is not me who needs to be lured over here. I can adapt quite easily and I am ok using GMCnet in its current format. I do have some ideas and preferences regarding improvements, but they are not unique. Others before me have made the same suggestions.

I support the need to make improvements but feel the focus should be on listening to those people who choose to refrain from using GMCnet. The reasons behind their decision are what we need to hear and adapt to.

Regarding my suggestions.
They would be:
- A mobile app for easier access from a smartphone.
- Improved photo embedding in messages.
- Merging of photo storage & document storage under the same umbrella as the discussion forum so searching, accessing, and linking to them is less of an ordeal. ( a 1 stop shop for all things TZE)
- use of an improved e-mail to forum interface that reduces the issue of broken threads.

Regarding the forum, it would likely serve some of our current and/or future members better if discussions were categorized better.

Categories such as:
engine
transmission
plumbing
body
interior
mods
rallies
classified adds
politics
religion
Thing-a-ma-jigs
What-cha-ma-call-its

The choice of what categories are desirable is driven purely by us “the users”, and our online conversations.
Many of the other automotive based forums I've belonged to were structured similarly. They also gave the users the ability to select which categories they wanted to receive notifications from. The notifications could be as simple as a text message saying user X posted on subject Y, or as detailed as individual e-mails containing the original post and individual e-mails for each reply.(very similar to how our e-mail interface delivers messages )
Users had good flexibility, which is not something we can brag about.

Les Burt
Montreal
'75 Eleganza 26'

>
>
>

>>
>> I am also truly wondering what issues make many of us so resistant to improving GMCNET to make it more attractive to our newer owners? This is a subject that really needs more focus and discussion so we can choose the right path.
>>
>>
>> Les Burt
>> Montreal
>> '75 Eleganza 26'
>
> Les
> instead of just making statements that it needs changes to make it attractive to our newer owners why don’t you give some detail as to what changes you feel are needed to
> make it more attractive. So far I have seen statements that just seem to be opinions without any facts to back up the opinions.
>
> It's easy to say lest make changes — much harder to give reasons why and to give information to back it up.
>
> Emery Stora
> 77 Kingsley
> Frederick, CO
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
 
  • Like
Reactions: Christo
This forum has a great supply of knowledge. I did a bus conversion before I started on my GMC. The bus world has several players. I have seen new
ones come and go. There are two major ones that I still follow. As much fun as facebook may be it is not easily searchable. A new forum may be
easier to navigate but will not have the history this one does. I have done a bunch of searching for GMC information. This is the most complete and
friendly forum with good answers and accurate information. People may go to a new forum or to facebook BUT if they have a serious question they will
end up here for the best and most accurate information no matter the difficulty in finding it or the round about answers from the members here.
That's the way it worked out for me in the bus world. If it was important it showed up on the old reliable site and everything else was just for fun
or people who got upset about something and left.

Just my thoughts

Melbo
--
Albuquerque NM Bus Conversion 1978 MCI 1973 GMC
 
To the OP, very nice!!

Very well organized. I like the fun sub-groups. Awesome.

I would think that as long as the credits are preserved that no one should have an issue with storing/preserving information on that site. I sincerely
hope it takes off.

Thank you for putting effort into this.

--
Todd Snyder, Buffalo NY
1976 Eleganza II
 
  • Like
Reactions: Christo
I'm just going to say one more thing and I'll leave it at that. I know people don't like change. I get it. For the same reason many of you don't
like change, some of us don't like change either. For me, for someone who has been using more modern forums for building Jeeps, Race Cars, and other
projects, the change back to this format is very difficult for me to handle. Lot's of great content, but just too frustrating to dig though it.

I'm attaching a picture to the post from one of the posts above from John that shows what I'm talking about. John typed 2 sentences comprising of
exactly 30 words. What we get in his post, is something so long, that I couldn't even zoom out far enough on my big monitor to include it in one
screen shot. I don't want to have to see Emory's reply and Les' reply again. I already read those replies earlier in the thread.

I hope I can figure out a way to pull some of the best importation out of here without the clutter. Like some of the guys said above....most of the
new owners of these coaches will be in their 30's and 40's and will have grown up with the internet most of their lives. If we want to keep the
enthusiasm up so the younger crowd is excited about GMCs, we need to reach them.

P.S. I tried to resize my screen shot and even at the lowest quality and resizing it to something only an ant could read, it was still too big of an
attachment for this page.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Christo
Hmmm! Seems likely that in this modern information age where everything
is only a question from Siri or google away, there is a note of foot
stamping impatience in many of the queries that rears it's ugly head.
Exhibited by shortcuts in statements, symbols used instead of proper
language, and other things that smacks of impudence and impatience in the
language, Everything from poor punctuation skills to outright rudeness and
lack of respect towards those have been around the block a few times, are
sometimes displayed. It is off-putting and insulting behavior and I for one
do not appreciate it a whole lot, and I am not alone in this camp. It
borders on demanding and disrespect.
Just my take on this.
Jim Hupy
Salem, Or, but presently at a combined 3 club rally with about 70 people at
7 Feathers Indian Casino in Southern Oregon, where our club is cooking
breakfast for the group. Many of us are working long hours for the pure joy
of helping others have a good time.

On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 6:32 PM Mike Perez via Gmclist <

> I'm just going to say one more thing and I'll leave it at that. I know
> people don't like change. I get it. For the same reason many of you don't
> like change, some of us don't like change either. For me, for someone who
> has been using more modern forums for building Jeeps, Race Cars, and other
> projects, the change back to this format is very difficult for me to
> handle. Lot's of great content, but just too frustrating to dig though
> it.
>
> I'm attaching a picture to the post from one of the posts above from John
> that shows what I'm talking about. John typed 2 sentences comprising of
> exactly 30 words. What we get in his post, is something so long, that I
> couldn't even zoom out far enough on my big monitor to include it in one
> screen shot. I don't want to have to see Emory's reply and Les' reply
> again. I already read those replies earlier in the thread.
>
> I hope I can figure out a way to pull some of the best importation out of
> here without the clutter. Like some of the guys said above....most of the
> new owners of these coaches will be in their 30's and 40's and will have
> grown up with the internet most of their lives. If we want to keep the
> enthusiasm up so the younger crowd is excited about GMCs, we need to reach
> them.
>
> P.S. I tried to resize my screen shot and even at the lowest quality and
> resizing it to something only an ant could read, it was still too big of an
> attachment for this page.
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
 
Good morning from the other side of the pond,

couple of notes:

The current forum has one big disadvantage: It doesn't look fresh.
The current forum has, from my point of view, the following advantages:
You can post from forum or mail.
It uses non-standard login methods, meaning very few spam.
It can easily be searched with google and the site: note.
A single place, not multiple subforums, makes it easy to choose where to
post.

Suggestion:
At the end of a thread, if a consensus has been achieved, why not trying
to summarize the issue on hand. That would be a hell of a service to
amyone searching for information. And, I know, probably won't happen.

Have a great weekend, wherever you are on our planet.
--
Best regards

Peer Oliver Schmidt
PGP KeyID: 0x4196BF22
'76a 26' Eleganza II - Virginia, US
'73 23' Sequoia - Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
 
I've watched this tread, looking at it from multiple sides and have to say it is
interesting. I bought my GMC 20 years ago after digesting the GMC motorhome sites
available on the internet at the time. 'have to say that it was a gutsy move at the
time because it was a mystery to many of the mechanics that I knew. ... and I'm no mechanic
myself. A mystery until a neighbor of mine who IS a mechanic made the comment that "It's
only a big boned Tornado:.

The sites are tools to be used. I'm not a fan of swallowing big bites of change at one
time, nor change for the sake of change. Clubs are a great source of first hand knowledge
and assistance. ... but don't wait on the sidelines. Put yourself out there and into the mix.

All I can say is, no two GMCers are the same or approach ownership the same way. Enjoy
your coach anyway you want to and don't look back.

jim Galbavy
'73 x-CL, ANNIE
Lake Mary, FL
 
I took a bit of time this evening to study this forum's membership stats for 2019.

Since 01 Jan 2019, we have 165 new members, of which 56 have posted messages. The other 109 have remained silent. Of the 56 that have posted messages,
17 have exceeded 10 posts each.

Currently we are at 3062 Members

For comparison, The FaceBook group "Classic GMC Motorhomes" has 5839 members.

A few years ago I had checked quickly and seem to recall much lower numbers.

I'm sharing this info because I had commented previously here that newcomers to this forum were not "busting down the doors". I'm not too proud to
admit when I'm wrong.

--
Les Burt
Montreal
1975 Eleganza 26ft
A work in Progress
 
Les,

No big deal. I thought I was wrong once but got over it. This forum is more
technical than social. The FB forums are more social than technical and at times
dishing out a lot of misinformation. There is a lot of good information here.

jim Galbavy
'73 x-CL, ANNIE
Lake Mary, FL
 
http://www.gmcmotorhomemarketplace.com/jhupy/

That's a $2.20 MOQ 100 part.

That's disrespectful.

Any time someone - on a technical forum - hits on grammar and attitude they're dead on arrival.

Grammar and disrespect. This isn't 30 years ago. Way to be welcoming.

--
“There he goes. One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some kind never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and
too rare to die.”

----

'78 Eleganza II

Plano, TX
 
> Les,
>
> No big deal. I thought I was wrong once but got over it. This forum is more
> technical than social. The FB forums are more social than technical and at times
> dishing out a lot of misinformation. There is a lot of good information here.
>
> jim Galbavy
> '73 x-CL, ANNIE
> Lake Mary, FL

This is very good summation of what this forum is.

You can almost see two groups here drawing the lines and digging in fortifications. There are super knowledgeable long timers (who are honestly are
walking encyclopedias of GMC) and the newer crew who have less experience with this specific beast but, all things considered, as much passion for it.
We are all here here to learn from each other, to share our good and bad days and to make sure we feel that we are not alone in our insane desire to
own a 40+ year old coach.

We (new comers with passions for our GMCs) are not here to prove that old ways are wrong. What was done with the technology available at the time GMCs
were manufactured is remarkable. Just as amazing is the fact that this forum was built up in the early days of the internet to form a tight knit
community of information exchange while satisfying the need for low bandwidth. Trust me, I remember the sound dial-up modems made. I never imagined
that a day would come when I can get nearly any information in the middle of the road just about anywhere, as long as I have signal strong enough to
place a phone call from my cellphone.

As far as newcomers here, most of us do not have the lifetime of experience working at engineering department of some engine manufacture, or on the
space program, or similar place. Some of us know more of bits and bites that nuts and bolts. But we do know stuff and we know where to find good
reliable information on "How to"... That's why we took a plunge and bought our GMCs. We may not be able to offer advice on what technical decisions
were made when GMCMH was made, but some of us may have a good insight on how to make modern technology work for everyone's advantage. Instead of
taking offense at the offer to update and freshen up the forum, lets work together to make sure that this becomes not just an update, but an
improvement. We need to figure out how to make sure that the needs of all users are met and satisfied. The only way this can be achieved is through
a constructive discussion and cooperation. Together we can keep moving forward while respecting and remembering all previous knowledge and
experience. After all, we're all in this together.
--
Vadim Jitkov
'76 Glenbrook 26'
Pullman, WA
 
Part of the problem is that once a newcomer posts for information; he or she gets these weirdly pushy "call me and make me an offer" messages.

No.

The dollar's different. Personal information - and access to - is different. Planning is different.

There's a strong subset of retired/desperate types here that flood a newcomer's inbox.

Sorry the dream ended in either 2007 or 2015 for you. Your sweet Royale with the compost toilet, Indian blanket over the cracked dash, and 7 cylinders
firing just isn't.....hmmmmmm.....the investment grade vehicle you're selling it as.

Sorry if that's disrespectful. My grammar's good, btw.

I make enough to support a family, pay taxes, and purchase and restore a coach.

Fully 1/3 of that is a cost you never faced but, benefited from.

It would be easier if the retirement I'm paying into, and you're benefiting from, was something to look forward to or, at least; available to renovate
the coach or defray gas expenses.

Enjoy the bennies, if not the respect.

Respect can't make you piss only once a night, though. Compost toilet or not.

--
“There he goes. One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some kind never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and
too rare to die.”

----

'78 Eleganza II

Plano, TX
 
I think that one thing you are missing is that some - I have
no idea how many now days - never look at the forum but
operate like me strictly off the email list.
On Fri, 2019-10-04 at 19:32 -0600, Mike Perez via Gmclist
wrote:
> that. I know people don't like change. I get it. For
> the same reason many of you don'tlike change, some of us
> don't like change either. For me, for someone who has
> been using more modern forums for building Jeeps, Race
> Cars, and otherprojects, the change back to this format is
> very difficult for me to handle. Lot's of great content,
> but just too frustrating to dig though it.
--




Jim Mills N0JME

Greeley, CO

1973 CanyonLands 260 TZE-063V100731
 
That is fascinating.

I looked at the site mentioned and found the products "Master Cylinder Power Bleeder" and "GM Hub extenders for '90s steel wheels".

I am always interested in saving money - can you provide a link to the comparable product "That's a $2.20 MOQ 100 part"?

Thanks in advance

Stu

--
Stu Rasmussen W7QJ
Silverton, OR
'77 Birchaven
 
Why do you think that is? Is it because the people that you reference prefer to have the new posts "pushed" to them, so they know when there is an
update, or do you think that it is just easier to type a reply in their email software?

I don't any of the new message board packages are setup to reply directly from email. (That doesn't mean it doesn't exist though). I think this forum
is pretty unique in that regard. The new software will eventually be able to push the subscribed topic's reply right to your phone or tablet if that
is how you prefer to browse.
 
Holy Smokes, Batman! Did I touch upon a sore that will not heal, or what?
There has NEVER BEEN a time that I have been less than willing to assist
this community (new guard or old school included) with factual and
professional help.
But, the last time that I checked, if it has feathers, webbed feet,
waddles a bit when it walks, and makes a "quack-quack" sound when it opens
it's mouth to speak, It SURELY MUST BE A DUCK.
And I don't need a computer generated voice to so inform me. Or
wikipedia, or SIRI.
I have spent the last 65 years of my life honing my craft, I served 4
years of servitude at the elbows of master craftsmen in my trade to earn my
journeyman card, and attended too many service schools to talk about here.
You may have a degree from well respected universities, but can't tell a
9/16" wrench from a hammer. I am a graduate of the school of hard knocks.
Two different branches of education. Which one is better? Depends where
you're standing, I guess.
Jim Hupy
Salem, Oregon (still at a rally in Southern Oregon, presently preparing to
fix a Sausage and Pancake Breakfast for 70 or so of my GMC friends).

On Sun, Oct 6, 2019, 4:56 AM Mike Perez via Gmclist
wrote:

> Why do you think that is? Is it because the people that you reference
> prefer to have the new posts "pushed" to them, so they know when there is an
> update, or do you think that it is just easier to type a reply in their
> email software?
>
> I don't any of the new message board packages are setup to reply directly
> from email. (That doesn't mean it doesn't exist though). I think this forum
> is pretty unique in that regard. The new software will eventually be able
> to push the subscribed topic's reply right to your phone or tablet if that
> is how you prefer to browse.
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>