This thread got me to thinking about HVAC air flow again, and the effective
mods some people have done to improve it. I neither indorse nor condemn
any of those, except for one aspect: DO NOT use combustible materials in
modifications, the following extract from another email, which I sent to
someone seems appropriate; it refers to a flexible plastic duct routed from
the HVAC box to the passenger side foot heater duct.:
"When John Richardson's coach had a battery fire a couple of years ago, the
flames immediately burned through a duct in that area. The fire, rather
than burning through the hood, immediately came into the cockpit, via the
melted duct, and "flowed" overhead all the way to the rear of the coach.
They were only a few yards from a fire truck so the flame was quickly
extinguished -- but the interior of the coach was destroyed -- and they
were lucky to not be burned themselves. Without that meltable/flammable
duct, there would probably have been little or no interior damage."
Whatever you do, DO NOT use combustible materials under the hood!
Ken H.
On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 7:17 PM John Phillips via Gmclist <
> Is there a general consensus that the evaporator is undersized in
> comparison to the rest of the system and the airflow is even worse?
>
> On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 4:05 PM Ken Henderson via Gmclist <
>
> > Mea culpa!!! I really blew this one: My computer was very slow
> recovering
> > the first of Tom's photos -- the Old Air flyer. Seeing the 1940's
> > under-dash looking "thing", I somehow ignored "A/C" in the description
> and
> > only read "Heat and Defrost". After reviewing the rest of the album, I
> > scratched my head (easy to so with no hair up there) and wondered "Why in
> > the world would anyone build a system with ONLY heat???" The obvious
> > answer, to my Georgia boy brain, was "Gotta be a Far-North Yankee or a
> > Canuck". So I forgot about Tom being from Virginia and sent my email
> > implying, "you won't like our temperatures" email.
> >
> > Tom, please accept my apologies for momentarily making you a Canuck.

> >
> > It's a NICE system; I'd probably have been a lot better off doing that or
> > something similar. I gained a little better air flow than original, but
> > with the OEM evaporator, no more cooling capacity.
> >
> > Ken H.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 6:19 PM Tom McManus via Gmclist <
> >
> > > Ken, When I do, it will be a cool ride.
> > > --
> > > Tom McManus
> > > 1977 Royale
> > >
> > > Chesapeake VA
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > GMCnet mailing list
> > > Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> > >
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > GMCnet mailing list
> > Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> >
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
> >
>
>
> --
>
> *John Phillips*
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
>
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>