How much real improvement with Disc Brakes on the rear?

heinz wittenbecher

New member
Mar 1, 1998
1,470
0
0
I'm about to accelerate my brake project, i.e. change to Disc Brakes on the
4 rears as supplied by TSM of Colorado.

Just wondering how much improvement, i.e. how much improvement in decreased
stopping distance can one expect with the switch from drum to disc?

TIA -- Heinz
www.bytedesigns.com/gmc
 
AT our last GMC Heritage Cruiser rally in Kingston Canada, several of the
members were suggesting achange to the carbon metallic disks in front, and a
special asbestos lined brake for the rear, with the addition of the
Powermaster brake unit to replace the original master cylinder and booster.
They claim that this conversin really makes the coach stand on end! Maybe
one of the members will read this, I know Al hamilton does and can give the
particulars..,As usual my mind was on something else I was working on and I
did not get all of the details, only enough to know who to ask when I start.
I already have the powermaster unit, found in Auto parts yard for $10.

>I'm about to accelerate my brake project, i.e. change to Disc Brakes on the
>4 rears as supplied by TSM of Colorado.
>
>Just wondering how much improvement, i.e. how much improvement in decreased
>stopping distance can one expect with the switch from drum to disc?
>
>TIA -- Heinz
>www.bytedesigns.com/gmc
>
>
>
>
 
>
> I'm about to accelerate my brake project, i.e. change to Disc Brakes
> on the 4 rears as supplied by TSM of Colorado.
>
> Just wondering how much improvement, i.e. how much improvement in
> decreased stopping distance can one expect with the switch from drum
> to disc?

Heinz,

I think the main benefit from the disk conversion is reduced brake
fade. The open construction of disk brake assemblies lets them shed
heat faster than drum brakes.

My $.02,
Patrick
- --
Patrick Flowers
Mailto:patri63

The GMC Motorhome Page
http://www.gmcmotorhome.com
 
>
> AT our last GMC Heritage Cruiser rally in Kingston Canada, several of
> the members were suggesting achange to the carbon metallic disks in
> front, and a special asbestos lined brake for the rear, with the
> addition of the Powermaster brake unit to replace the original master
> cylinder and booster. They claim that this conversin really makes the
> coach stand on end! Maybe one of the members will read this, I know
> Al hamilton does and can give the particulars..,As usual my mind was
> on something else I was working on and I did not get all of the
> details, only enough to know who to ask when I start. I already have
> the powermaster unit, found in Auto parts yard for $10.

The asbestos lined rear shoes are no longer available(in the US at
least). IIRC, 9/30/97 was the last date that they could be sold. Don't
know what the "hot tip" is now, except that you should be sure to get 2"
wide shoes.

Patrick
- --
Patrick Flowers
Mailto:patri63

The GMC Motorhome Page
http://www.gmcmotorhome.com
 
Maybe but remember there is less actual pad contacting the disk than shoe to
drum, look at the difference in area between the two. . It is the disk pad
that causes the fade at first and not the rotor. maybe people are going to
spend a lot of money with little if any gain in performance. If you can
already lock up the tires what is the point?

>>
>> I'm about to accelerate my brake project, i.e. change to Disc Brakes
>> on the 4 rears as supplied by TSM of Colorado.
>>
>> Just wondering how much improvement, i.e. how much improvement in
>> decreased stopping distance can one expect with the switch from drum
>> to disc?
>
>Heinz,
>
>I think the main benefit from the disk conversion is reduced brake
>fade. The open construction of disk brake assemblies lets them shed
>heat faster than drum brakes.
>
>My $.02,
>Patrick
>--
>Patrick Flowers
>Mailto:patri63
>
>The GMC Motorhome Page
>http://www.gmcmotorhome.com
>
>
 
Patrick not true that asbestos is no longer available in the US. It is not
advertised and does not say asbestos is used on the shoe box, but I have
personally checked and there is a thin veneer of asbestos between the new
linings and the metal. I have some additional information that I found and
will dig it up as to part numbers and where you get them. I looked at a
pair at my local parts store after returning from the last rally.

>>
>> AT our last GMC Heritage Cruiser rally in Kingston Canada, several of
>> the members were suggesting achange to the carbon metallic disks in
>> front, and a special asbestos lined brake for the rear, with the
>> addition of the Powermaster brake unit to replace the original master
>> cylinder and booster. They claim that this conversin really makes the
>> coach stand on end! Maybe one of the members will read this, I know
>> Al hamilton does and can give the particulars..,As usual my mind was
>> on something else I was working on and I did not get all of the
>> details, only enough to know who to ask when I start. I already have
>> the powermaster unit, found in Auto parts yard for $10.
>
>The asbestos lined rear shoes are no longer available(in the US at
>least). IIRC, 9/30/97 was the last date that they could be sold. Don't
>know what the "hot tip" is now, except that you should be sure to get 2"
>wide shoes.
>
>Patrick
>--
>Patrick Flowers
>Mailto:patri63
>
>The GMC Motorhome Page
>http://www.gmcmotorhome.com
>
>
 
>
> I'm about to accelerate my brake project, i.e. change to Disc Brakes on the
(SNIP)

I did the switch to Leigh's rear brakes and it was quite good. I
estimat about a 20% better stopping distance and no fade after 10 hard
panic stops from about 45 mph.

Let us know how you like the TSM setup, I may use them on my other
coaches.

Marcus
 
>
> Patrick not true that asbestos is no longer available in the US. It
> is not advertised and does not say asbestos is used on the shoe box,
> but I have personally checked and there is a thin veneer of asbestos
> between the new linings and the metal. I have some additional
> information that I found and will dig it up as to part numbers and
> where you get them. I looked at a pair at my local parts store after
> returning from the last rally.

If it's between the lining and the metal, then it's just there as an
insulator, not friction material.

Patrick
- --
Patrick Flowers
Mailto:patri63

The GMC Motorhome Page
http://www.gmcmotorhome.com
 
>
> Maybe but remember there is less actual pad contacting the disk than
> shoe to drum, look at the difference in area between the two. . It
> is the disk pad that causes the fade at first and not the rotor.
> maybe people are going to spend a lot of money with little if any
> gain in performance. If you can already lock up the tires what is the
> point?

Well, that is partly the point. Another big advantage to disks is that
they are more resistant to locking than drums - which also make them
poor parking brakes. Once the tires lose traction, you're along for the
ride from that point on. Also, swept area is only part of the
equation. The caliper cylinder is much larger diameter, generating more
force per unit area. Fade does begin with the pad surface and the heat
must be sloughed off in order for the brakes to become effective again.
With drum brakes the heat must be passed through the drum. With discs,
it's passed through the rotor and convectively by airflow around the
caliper.

This issue was settled by the racing community years ago. We can debate
it here all we want, but, with the exception of lockup(which is only
desireable for parking) disc brakes just perform better.

Patrick
- --
Patrick Flowers
Mailto:patri63

The GMC Motorhome Page
http://www.gmcmotorhome.com
 
>
> In a message dated 98-06-22 07:52:02 EDT, you write:
>
> The asbestos lined rear shoes are no longer available(in the US at
> least). IIRC, 9/30/97 was the last date that they could be sold.
> Don't know what the "hot tip" is now, except that you should be sure
> to get 2" wide shoes.
>
> Patrick >>
>
> The original asbestos shoes are available from a fellow in Colorado.
> Just bought some. I'll have to look up his address and post it later
> if you are interested.

Actually, I have a set new in the box. I will probably be looking to
sell them as I'm also planning to go with the TSM disc conversion. I
wouldn't be surprised if Ray Curtis at Eaton RV still had a few sets in
stock.

Patrick
- --
Patrick Flowers
Mailto:patri63

The GMC Motorhome Page
http://www.gmcmotorhome.com
 
Yes

>In a message dated 98-06-22 07:52:02 EDT, you write:
>
> The asbestos lined rear shoes are no longer available(in the US at
> least). IIRC, 9/30/97 was the last date that they could be sold. Don't
> know what the "hot tip" is now, except that you should be sure to get 2"
> wide shoes.
>
> Patrick
> --
> Patrick Flowers
> Mailto:patri63 >>
>
>The original asbestos shoes are available from a fellow in Colorado. Just
>bought some. I'll have to look up his address and post it later if you are
>interested.
>
>
 
Thanks to all for your paticipation/replies. Very much appreciated.

Rick S> "This is why we all go to our friendly Ford dealer to buy their
super high-boiling point brake fluid. (You do know this, don't you?)"

Rick's comment was a brand newy to me so I'll do more digging.

In the meantime, discs are on order and hopefully the ss brakelines will
arrive at same time... and off to the shop we go :-)

Thanks again for all your comments. This internet stuff sure is great.

Heinz -- www.bytedesigns.com/gmc
 
>
> Did you know that more people died from swallowing toothpicks last
> year than died from asbestos related deaths. Sounds to me like we
> better do something about toothpicks. Just thought you would
> like to know.
>
> Take Care
> Arch
Ok:

This is getting off topic, but my wife takes asbestos very seriously.
Although I agree the EPA may seem fickle about it's use, the seriousness
is the production facility wher the products are made, the brake shop
where the grunts are exposed on a daily basis. Her father worked as a
boiler engineer at Kodak during the 40's thru the 80's. Came into a low
to moderate (not heavy at all and not on a daily basis) contact with
asbestos as was common at that time. He smoked until the mid 60's, but
quit cold turkey in 65. He was a healthy, slim, strong man who retired
at 65 from Kodak. 3 years later he was coughing up blood and was
diagnosed with asbestosis in his lungs, he was dead within 18 months.
The autopsy showed no other medical problems. The constant low level
exposure to asbestos killed him. So, a few brakes with asbestos shoes
will not cause a big problem to the general population, but it is the
people that make them, service them and in general come into much
greater contact than you or I on a daily basis that pay the price. Yes,
they could all wear some high tech protective clothing, but that would
drive the price of production way to high and the low cost substitue
that we all use now would be what was sold.

OK, off my soap box, but sometimes you have to look a little past your
evryday life to get to the reallity of a regulation. I used to think
the same way until I expressed my opinion one day and got chastised by
my wife for about 2 weeks.

Marcus
 
Heinz:

To add fuel to the fire. I'm told that SS brake lines are not as strong
as standard steel lines and that they dent/crush easier. That should
also mean that they will also kink easier.

Paul Bartz

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Heinz Wittenbecher [SMTP:heinz]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 1998 11:31 AM
> To: gmcmotorhome
> Subject: RE: GMC: How much real improvement with Disc Brakes on
> the rear?
>
> Thanks to all for your paticipation/replies. Very much appreciated.
>
> Rick S> "This is why we all go to our friendly Ford dealer to buy
> their super high-boiling point brake fluid. (You do know this, don't
> you?)"
>
> Rick's comment was a brand newy to me so I'll do more digging.
>
> In the meantime, discs are on order and hopefully the ss brakelines
> will arrive at same time... and off to the shop we go :-)
>
> Thanks again for all your comments. This internet stuff sure is great.
>
> Heinz -- www.bytedesigns.com/gmc
>
 
>
> To add fuel to the fire. I'm told that SS brake lines are not as
> strong as standard steel lines and that they dent/crush easier. That
> should also mean that they will also kink easier.

Paul,

I'm not sure I buy that one. I think Classic is using T304 stainless
which is pretty tough stuff. I've got several feet of it in half-inch
diameter at home and it's a bear to bend. "Bundy" tubing, OTOH, is
alloyed to be very malleable which allows it to be bent easily.
Stainless would probably kink easier while you're bending it, but I
would think it would be more resistant to denting/crushing.

I'm with the folks from Missouri on this one.
Patrick
- --
Patrick Flowers
Mailto:patri63

The GMC Motorhome Page
http://www.gmcmotorhome.com
 
Wow, that was not expected.
Does that mean one should reconsider the ss? I'm going to assume not.

decisions, decisions....

Heinz

>
> To add fuel to the fire. I'm told that SS brake lines are not as strong
> as standard steel lines and that they dent/crush easier. That should
> also mean that they will also kink easier.
>
> Paul Bartz
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Heinz Wittenbecher [SMTP:heinz]
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 1998 11:31 AM
> > To: gmcmotorhome
> > Subject: RE: GMC: How much real improvement with Disc Brakes on
> > the rear?
> >
> > Thanks to all for your paticipation/replies. Very much appreciated.
> >
> > Rick S> "This is why we all go to our friendly Ford dealer to buy
> > their super high-boiling point brake fluid. (You do know this, don't
> > you?)"
> >
> > Rick's comment was a brand newy to me so I'll do more digging.
> >
> > In the meantime, discs are on order and hopefully the ss brakelines
> > will arrive at same time... and off to the shop we go :-)
> >
> > Thanks again for all your comments. This internet stuff sure is great.
> >
> > Heinz -- www.bytedesigns.com/gmc
> >
>
 
>
> Was this last date of sale or last date of manufacture? I believe it
> is the latter in which case there could be asbestos shoes available
> still. Of course I could be wrong.

The following is an excerpt from an email I received from Wes Caughlin
July 27, 1997:

>
> >
> >What are the best friction materials to use? I remember some
> >discussion on this subject in GMCMHN a while back. Please provide
> >part numbers or point me to the proper issue is this hasn't changed.
>
> Order now and get the best quality. It will include asbestos brake
> shoes for the rear through August. Come September, we can't sell
> asbestos.

Now you know all I know on the subject. I'm sure the EPA doesn't
have "Asbestos Cops" going through every garage and parts house, so
those with previous stocks of these parts may still be selling them
until they run out.

Patrick
- --
Patrick Flowers
Mailto:patri63

The GMC Motorhome Page
http://www.gmcmotorhome.com
 
Patrick

I have to agree with you on this one. The main reason I did not
make my lines out of ss was it was just to hard to work with.
My hand brake line bender could hardly bend the stuff. It took
6 tries before we got a good double flare. The problem was when
we tried to flare the line the part that holds the line would let
the line slip because of all the pressure it took to flare it.
This stuff seems like it is tough. What we did get to bend
did not seem like it wanted to kink anymore than the coated
line I ended up using. Just my thoughts---thats all.

Take Care
arch
DeSoto IL
~~~~~~~~~~~~\____/~~~~~~~~~~~~~
www.gcbr.com

- ----------
> From: Patrick Flowers
> To: gmcmotorhome
> Subject: Re: GMC: How much real improvement with Disc Brakes on the rear?
> Date: Tuesday, June 23, 1998 11:21 AM
>

> >
> > To add fuel to the fire. I'm told that SS brake lines are not as
> > strong as standard steel lines and that they dent/crush easier. That
> > should also mean that they will also kink easier.
>
> Paul,
>
> I'm not sure I buy that one. I think Classic is using T304 stainless
> which is pretty tough stuff. I've got several feet of it in half-inch
> diameter at home and it's a bear to bend. "Bundy" tubing, OTOH, is
> alloyed to be very malleable which allows it to be bent easily.
> Stainless would probably kink easier while you're bending it, but I
> would think it would be more resistant to denting/crushing.
>
> I'm with the folks from Missouri on this one.
> Patrick
> --
> Patrick Flowers
> Mailto:patri63
>
> The GMC Motorhome Page
> http://www.gmcmotorhome.com
 
Rick,
Very thorough explaination, you should do a "white paper" on the subject
and let people not on the net make their modification decisions based on
this input. Thank you.

Jim Bounds www.gmccoop.com

>
> To all,
> Sorry, but I've just gotta jump into this discussion with some brake system
> basics.
>
> 1. Disc brakes vs drum brakes: When drum brakes overheat, the drum tends to
> expand and "bell-mouth". (The open side of the drum expands more than the
> side with the mounting web.) This causes the shoes to lose contact with that
> open side, reducing the shoe contact area, accelerating lining fade, etc.
> Things go downhill fast after that, and so do you. 8-0
> By contrast, the disc brake disc (or "rotor" as the ever-pretentious American
> manufacturers like to call them) gets much hotter than a typical brake drum
> (Ever see pictures of a race car at night, its brake discs glowing cherry
> red?), but they don't distort in such a way to lose contact with the pads.
> Also, the disc brake pads operate at much higher presure per square inch of
> lining. This makes them less susceptible to fade due to reduced coefficient
> of friction from heat. Further, they can cut through a film of water to stop
> better when wet, and their harder denser material doesn't absorb water as much
> as typical drum brake linings.
>
> 2 Disc brake disadvantages: Aside from higher initial cost, the main
> problem is the difficulty and expense of adding a parking brake to a disc
> brake caliper. Since the pads require very high pressure to apply them, you
> must contrive a very strong lever system with great mechanical advantage.
> (The service brakes just use a really big piston with large surface area.)
> This mechanism must somehow apply pressure more or less concentric with the
> hydraulic piston. Some cars (Subaru comes to mind) use a pushrod right into
> the cylinder, but this can cause leaks. I once owned a Citroen with a
> completely separate set of pads operated by the hand brake on the front discs.
> Some cars (Corvette, Porsche, et al) put a separate drum brake in the middle
> of the rear brake discs just to get a parking brake.
> One other problem which has come to light recently is brake fluid boiling
> due to the higher temperatures involved. This of course causes total loss of
> braking, and excessive excercise of the driver's sphincter muscles! Metallic
> and semi-metallic brake pads, introduced to replaced the now-banned asbestos
> friction material, do a fine job of providing friction at high temperatures,
> but they transmit much more of that heat to the caliper piston and the fluid.
> (Asbestos of course is a good insulator.) Numerous accidents have resulted
> from the EPA's drive to clean the air of the last particle of asbestos. This
> is why we all go to our friendly Ford dealer to buy their super high-boiling
> point brake fluid. (You do know this, don't you?)
>
> 3 Duo-servo plusses and minusses: The rear drum brakes on our GMCs (as on
> most American cars for the last 40 years) are Bendix duo-servo brakes. These
> brakes derive much of their application force from the forward rotation of the
> drum. The wheel cylinder (or E-brake lever) pushes the leading shoe out
> against the drum, whereupon it is dragged in the direction of rotation
> slightly. This motion is transmitted through the adjuster strut to the rear
> shoe, pressing it firmly against the drum. This allows a simpler hydraulic
> system with smaller wheel cylinders, and at least the possibility of stopping
> should the power booster fail. OTOH, when things start to fade, that fade is
> multiplied, just as the apply force was, so........
>
> Bottome line: If you drive in the mountains and/or with a heavy load or
> toad, the rear disc brakes may reduce your chance of brake fade. Otherwise,
> you shouldn't need them IF your stock system is in good condition, properly
> adjusted, etc. The GMC was noted for its great brakes when it was new, we
> just need to get it back to that condition, IMHO.
>
> Returning the soapbox to the next speaker,
>
> Rick Staples,
> Burned-out certified Master Technician.
 
Arch,
Yea, it is a shame. I will say though that asbestos is a bad thing and
many people had real complications derived from it. My Grandfather
developed resperatory failure from the stuff but he was exposed in a
paper mill for several decades.

All that is it may be, I sure don't have a desire to lick my brake shoes
and if someone gets close enough to my drums to be effected by the
asbestos linings, guess what- I've probobly run over them and they have
alote more problems than shiffing my brakes!!

Other than the crusade to whip out all use of the satanic asbestos, is
there some specific health problem with using asbestos brake linings?
Does anyone know?

Jim Bounds www.gmccoop.com

>
> In a message dated 98-06-23 00:16:55 EDT, you write:
>
> from the EPA's drive to clean the air of the last particle of asbestos. This
> is why we all go to our friendly Ford dealer to buy their super high-boiling
> point brake fluid. (You do know this, don't you?)
> >>
> Rick
>
> Did you know that more people died from swallowing toothpicks last
> year than died from asbestos related deaths. Sounds to me like we
> better do something about toothpicks. Just thought you would
> like to know.
>
> Take Care
> Arch