> Going to Karen's defense here a bit, she did not mean to criticize Kim or
> any other GMCMI member or officer. She was just pointing out what is
> obvious to those of us located west of the Continental divide. GMCMI is
> conspicuous by its absence west of the Pecos. By intent or pure
> happenstance does not matter much. It is factual. What has been stated is a
> common problem when planning any convention, motor home included or not.
> Las Vegas has several venues. L.A. County has a couple, but is
> geographically situated on the west coast, too far away for many in the
> east. Same said for Oregon, Washington, and Canada. Venues exist, but the
> complaints are as valid for the eastern gmc'ers as Oklahoma is for the
> western owners. Splitting GMCMI into 2 groups when we are trying to
> increase membership makes little sense either. A thorny problem, FMCA does
> it, but has a much larger membership. If there is an easy answer, it
> escapes me.
> Jim Hupy, President, GMC CASCADERS.
> MEMBER, 49ers, GMCMI, F.M.C.A.
For some reason, Jim's post isn't on the forum, but is on the email list. Not sure what
that's about. But thank you. As I said, this is not a criticism of the people doing the work.
At any rate, I could see GMCMI doing the magazine and being a central source for ALL significant documentation,
but leaving the actual rallies to be run by two or three regional multi-state clubs. Then GMCMI really would be
"International", could focus on promotion, and the rally equipment transportation costs would be minimized.
Just an idea.
As our coaches dwindle and age, I think multi-state rallies will need to be more common.
And in my experience, the more coaches we can get in one place, the more fun it is.
Karen
1975 26'
> any other GMCMI member or officer. She was just pointing out what is
> obvious to those of us located west of the Continental divide. GMCMI is
> conspicuous by its absence west of the Pecos. By intent or pure
> happenstance does not matter much. It is factual. What has been stated is a
> common problem when planning any convention, motor home included or not.
> Las Vegas has several venues. L.A. County has a couple, but is
> geographically situated on the west coast, too far away for many in the
> east. Same said for Oregon, Washington, and Canada. Venues exist, but the
> complaints are as valid for the eastern gmc'ers as Oklahoma is for the
> western owners. Splitting GMCMI into 2 groups when we are trying to
> increase membership makes little sense either. A thorny problem, FMCA does
> it, but has a much larger membership. If there is an easy answer, it
> escapes me.
> Jim Hupy, President, GMC CASCADERS.
> MEMBER, 49ers, GMCMI, F.M.C.A.
For some reason, Jim's post isn't on the forum, but is on the email list. Not sure what
that's about. But thank you. As I said, this is not a criticism of the people doing the work.
At any rate, I could see GMCMI doing the magazine and being a central source for ALL significant documentation,
but leaving the actual rallies to be run by two or three regional multi-state clubs. Then GMCMI really would be
"International", could focus on promotion, and the rally equipment transportation costs would be minimized.
Just an idea.
As our coaches dwindle and age, I think multi-state rallies will need to be more common.
And in my experience, the more coaches we can get in one place, the more fun it is.
Karen
1975 26'