Rick, a bit more on this subject.
Wonder of wonders, I found this companies phone number in GMCMI newsletter
#12 (summer 85), dialed it and 14 years later they are still at the same
number.
Changed owners, but still have that kit available under the same Part Number
13438. The man I talked to said these components are somewhat stronger than
original, rated 500 hp versus 400 hp for the original parts.
Forgot to ask if they were straight cut gears but I wouldn't have a problem
if they were.
1985 price was $303
1998 price is $415 plus shipping.
Local transmission shop can install, if you don't need a winter project.
A.C.T.
Fountain Valley, Ca. 92708
(714) 962-6655
Cheers,
Don Miller
75 Glenbrook
Shenandoah Valley of Virginia
>Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 12:13:28 EST
>From: RickStapls
>Subject: GMC: TRANSMISSION gear ratios
>
> With all the recent discussion of final drive and transfer chain ratios,
I
>wonder if anyone has any information/experience with changing the actual
GEARS
>inside the transmission for different ratios?
> I read in a GMCMI newsletter from way back in '85 (newsletter #12,
summer
>'85) that a company in Fountain Valley, California was selling replacement
>gearsets which reduced the 1st, 2nd, and Reverse gears to lower
(numerically
>higher) ratios. Specifically, 1st gear went fro, 2.48:1 to 2.75:1, second
>went from 1.48:1 to 1.57:1, and reverse from 2.11:1 to 2.46:1. 3rd (high)
>gear, involving no gears within the transmission, remains at 1.00:1.
> I also recall seeing another reference to such a project, but I can't
>remember where. ("The first thing to go....") IIRC, they said the
replacement
>gears were straight-cut rather than helical like the originals, making them
a
>bit stronger abeit noisier.
> This sounds like the best of both worlds for those of us trying to start
>off on steep hills over 10,000 feet altitude. The lower 2nd gear would
give
>more power on long pulls, although one might not be able to hold 2nd gear
up
>to 70+ mph as you can now. The stock 3rd gear ratio would allow us to get
>across Kansas with minimum noise and fuel.
> Does anyone out there have any experience/information about such
>modifications? Does anyone know if "Art Car Performance Transmission" is
>still in business, or any other such sources? Any leads appreciated.
>
>TIA,
>Rick Staples,
>'75 Eleganza, Louisville, CO
>
Wonder of wonders, I found this companies phone number in GMCMI newsletter
#12 (summer 85), dialed it and 14 years later they are still at the same
number.
Changed owners, but still have that kit available under the same Part Number
13438. The man I talked to said these components are somewhat stronger than
original, rated 500 hp versus 400 hp for the original parts.
Forgot to ask if they were straight cut gears but I wouldn't have a problem
if they were.
1985 price was $303
1998 price is $415 plus shipping.
Local transmission shop can install, if you don't need a winter project.
A.C.T.
Fountain Valley, Ca. 92708
(714) 962-6655
Cheers,
Don Miller
75 Glenbrook
Shenandoah Valley of Virginia
>Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 12:13:28 EST
>From: RickStapls
>Subject: GMC: TRANSMISSION gear ratios
>
> With all the recent discussion of final drive and transfer chain ratios,
I
>wonder if anyone has any information/experience with changing the actual
GEARS
>inside the transmission for different ratios?
> I read in a GMCMI newsletter from way back in '85 (newsletter #12,
summer
>'85) that a company in Fountain Valley, California was selling replacement
>gearsets which reduced the 1st, 2nd, and Reverse gears to lower
(numerically
>higher) ratios. Specifically, 1st gear went fro, 2.48:1 to 2.75:1, second
>went from 1.48:1 to 1.57:1, and reverse from 2.11:1 to 2.46:1. 3rd (high)
>gear, involving no gears within the transmission, remains at 1.00:1.
> I also recall seeing another reference to such a project, but I can't
>remember where. ("The first thing to go....") IIRC, they said the
replacement
>gears were straight-cut rather than helical like the originals, making them
a
>bit stronger abeit noisier.
> This sounds like the best of both worlds for those of us trying to start
>off on steep hills over 10,000 feet altitude. The lower 2nd gear would
give
>more power on long pulls, although one might not be able to hold 2nd gear
up
>to 70+ mph as you can now. The stock 3rd gear ratio would allow us to get
>across Kansas with minimum noise and fuel.
> Does anyone out there have any experience/information about such
>modifications? Does anyone know if "Art Car Performance Transmission" is
>still in business, or any other such sources? Any leads appreciated.
>
>TIA,
>Rick Staples,
>'75 Eleganza, Louisville, CO
>