I have been a long-time owner (and a regular member of this GMCNet, which I
enjoy tremendously).
As I write this, I am frustrated about the strong feelings that are
emulating from this forum. I side with the "Engineering Types" because I am
one. But the purpose of this GMCNet is not to pass judgement on who is
correct, but to learn from our experiences and pass them on to other GMC
owners.
I applaud Henry Davis in his response regarding the "Tire Pressure" thread.
This same perspective applies to some other GMC "myths". Henry has done a
very nice job of putting it all into perspective! Thank you, Henry, for so
eloquently replying for the "Engineering Types".
Scott Shean
Baton Rouge, LA
78 Royale
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-gmcmotorhome
>[mailto
wner-gmcmotorhome]On Behalf Of Henry Davis
>Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 1999 2:17 PM
>..........The bottom line is that when I design it involves compromise and
failure
>rates. There's precious few absolutes.
.......................
>Henry
>
enjoy tremendously).
As I write this, I am frustrated about the strong feelings that are
emulating from this forum. I side with the "Engineering Types" because I am
one. But the purpose of this GMCNet is not to pass judgement on who is
correct, but to learn from our experiences and pass them on to other GMC
owners.
I applaud Henry Davis in his response regarding the "Tire Pressure" thread.
This same perspective applies to some other GMC "myths". Henry has done a
very nice job of putting it all into perspective! Thank you, Henry, for so
eloquently replying for the "Engineering Types".
Scott Shean
Baton Rouge, LA
78 Royale
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-gmcmotorhome
>[mailto
wner-gmcmotorhome]On Behalf Of Henry Davis>Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 1999 2:17 PM
>..........The bottom line is that when I design it involves compromise and
failure
>rates. There's precious few absolutes.
.......................
>Henry
>
