G'day,
I found the following information on Gene Fisher's website and decided to
forward it to Dave Lenzi for verification:
Quote:
Here's some additional information that might be helpful.
Here are the hub/knuckle measurements from Cinnabar.
The hub diameter is supposed to be 2.0015 to 2.0025 with no steps or taper.
The bearing inside diameter is 2.000, that means the hub is 0.0015 to 0.0025
larger than the bearing resulting in a stiff press fit.
The knuckle diameter is supposed to be 3.2510 to 3.2525 with no more
than.0015 out of round. The average diameter must be within the 3.2510 -
3.2525 spec and the minimum diameter must be at least 3.2510. The bearing
size is 3.250, that means the knuckle is .0010 to .0025 larger than the
bearing. This is what my machinist calls an interference fit, it presses on
quite easily.
Charles Wersal
Unquote:
I received the following response from Dave:
Quote:
Rob,
This is NOT good information. I contacted Charles years ago to have him
change the dimensions of the knuckle. Obviously it did not happen.
The dimensions that Cinnabar is using came from an old GM drawing which I
have in my possession. This so called interference fit is actually a slip
fit (or what I like to call a SLOP fit).
Timken never did agree with this fit. GM insisted upon this loose fit so
owners/shops could service the bearings every 25,000 miles without removing
the knuckle from the coach. Their service manual shows the use of a slide
hammer to remove the hub, bearings from the coach, while leaving the knuckle
in place.
This fit, also utilized on every Toro and Eldo, is one of the reasons for
early bearing failures. The other reason is that the surface finish was very
poor. The single point tool (lathe) left ridges in the bore surface that
pounded out, only to make the bearing bore out of round and larger yet.
The correct fit for a Timken bearing in our knuckle is as follows. The bore
should be 3.2494 plus/minus .0002
This results in a light press fit of the outer race into the bore. A smaller
bore will dramatically reduce the pre established .009 clearance in the
bearing set by Timken.
My reworked knuckles are held to a much closer tolerance/surface finish than
ANY available today, because my knuckles are ground, not bored in a lathe.
PLEASE QUOTE ME, if you elect to post information on this subject.
Dave
Unquote
Regards,
Rob M.
The Pedantic Mechanic
USAussie - Downunder
AUS '75 Avion - The Blue Streak TZE365V100428
USA '75 Avion - Double Trouble TZE365V100426
USA '77 Kingsley - TZE 267V100808
-----Original Message-----
From: Gmclist [mailto:gmclist-bounces] On Behalf Of Robert
Gish
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 2:18 PM
To: gmclist
Subject: [GMCnet] Front wheel bearing service, hub repair
Right in the middle of servicing the front wheel bearings and when I pull
the bearings off one of the hub's I find two large gouges either from a
previous catastrophic bearing failure or a catastrophic attempt at bearing
removal. My question is what are the hub's made of and can they be welded?
I have a TIG machine and I'm sure I could fill the divots and turn the hub
round again but are the hub's heat treated?
Also during this adventure I found a generic pulled in my toolbox that
worked great for pulling the bearing stack off the hub without damaging the
bearings if anyone wants to get one like it I would be glad to share the
information.
--
76 Eleganza mostly stock, Sully bags, needs one of everything.
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org