Thanks, Mark.
I tried it and it works.
If anyone needs a replacement transducer take note of the following number:
Checker Auto #36-102 ($60.99 plus core). Checker lists this one for the '76
Caddy Eldorado and the number cross references to GMC #2503 0712, the number
shown in GMC dealer's computer as the successor for the one listed in our GMC
Motorhome parts manual.
The AC/Delco rebuilds have been discontinued. Cinnabar also says they are unable
to get rebuilds, so I was happy to find one at Checker. It's rebuilt by
A1-Cardone.
Richard
- ----- Original Message -----
From: Mark Grady
To:
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 1999 8:41 PM
Subject: RE: GMC: cruise control question
> Better too high a resistance than too low. The hold solenoid coil in the
> transducer is usually the part that fails (electrically at least);
> mechanically its the bearing on the eddy plate that goes first.
>
> As long as the transducer will engage and hold, (and it probably will) don't
> worry about it.
>
> Note too that some original GMC transducers are 'three wire' units with a
> separate signal lead to the dash cruise light. Only Buick/Cad (maybe some
> Olds) used this configuration. All others are 2 wire with no engaged
> (cruise) signal light. The 2 wire units will work just the same.
>
> Mark
>
> |-----Original Message-----
> |From: owner-gmcmotorhome
> |[mailto

wner-gmcmotorhome]On Behalf Of Richard Guthart
> |Sent: Thursday, August 05, 1999 7:16 PM
> |To: gmcmotorhome
> |Subject: GMC: cruise control question
> |
> |
> |I just purchased a rebuilt cruise control transducer from Checker Auto. The
> |instructions which came with it contain the same detailed
> |electrical and vacuum
> |checkout procedures found in our GMC service manual. According to these
> |instructions, however, the "resistance wire" which supplies the
> |transducer's
> |coil is supposed to read 22-24 ohms. The GMC manual says 38-42
> |ohms. (Mine reads
> |40.)
> |
> |Anyone know if I need to replace the resistance wire? Can I damage
> |the rebuilt
> |transducer by trying to use it without replacing the wire?
> |
> |Richard
>