Tom "Sawyer" Warner wrote: >
Controversy can also act as a disincentive for some folks to get
involved. Witness the Lurker/poster ratio on the 'net.
Well, I agree this whole episode was enough to irritate an oyster. If
some were persuaded to sign up for the Black List based on a bogus
discussion proposing to offer help only to names on the list, it seems
to me that violates the "voluntary" nature of Roger's idea. If I ever
need to call a "Blacklister for help, (I should realistically say "when"
instead of "if") I certainly hope his name's there because he (or she!)
was sincere in their offer of assistance.
That said, I do agree that insufficient mechanical aptitude is no excuse
for not signing up. I've been on the Black list since Roger first
proposed it, and the only thing I know how to fix is a cold adult
beverage. (Well, and maybe an airbag.)
Tim Brown
78 Royale (Eventually, everyone on the 'net will get one!)
Jackson Mich
http://community.webtv.net/tbrown78/TimBrownsGMC
Controversy can also act as a disincentive for some folks to get
involved. Witness the Lurker/poster ratio on the 'net.
Well, I agree this whole episode was enough to irritate an oyster. If
some were persuaded to sign up for the Black List based on a bogus
discussion proposing to offer help only to names on the list, it seems
to me that violates the "voluntary" nature of Roger's idea. If I ever
need to call a "Blacklister for help, (I should realistically say "when"
instead of "if") I certainly hope his name's there because he (or she!)
was sincere in their offer of assistance.
That said, I do agree that insufficient mechanical aptitude is no excuse
for not signing up. I've been on the Black list since Roger first
proposed it, and the only thing I know how to fix is a cold adult
beverage. (Well, and maybe an airbag.)
Tim Brown
78 Royale (Eventually, everyone on the 'net will get one!)
Jackson Mich
http://community.webtv.net/tbrown78/TimBrownsGMC