bleeding brakes

terry skinner

New member
Dec 30, 1998
2,253
0
0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
. BTW, I'm still bleeding my brakes. It's tough (understatement of the
day) gettin
all the air out of a completely new brake system on this coach!

Patrick
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
May I suggest a large pumper oil can (the type used by the engineer on the
old steam engines) filled with brake fluid.Slide one end of a piece of
plastic tubing over the outlet. The other end goes over the bleeder at the
wheel. Now pump the brake fluid into the system until it comes up at the
master cylinder. Works great. Wish I could claim this as my invention, but
they have been using this technique on small aircraft sense I was a
whipper-snapper. What ever you do don't let the can run dry. It pumps air
just as easy as brake fluid. and you have to start over.

Terry Skinner
Webfooted in Washington
'76 Glenbrook
 
>
> Patrick,
> are you doing TSM brakes?
> If so, be sure holes are straight up vertical, i.e. caliper off.

Yep, doin' the TSM shuffle - tough dancin' with a partner that has six
feet. I'm using non-parking brake calipers on all four, so I was able to
mount them upright. Still, it's tough just getting all the air out of the
lines. I'm using a vacuum bleeder and borrowed your trick for wrapping the
bleeders with teflon tape.

BTW - I don't know if you guys remember the box of disposable poly gloves I
picked up at Home Depot when I rebuilt my hubs and CV's. My first try at
bleeding the brakes was barehanded(yeah - I know... I read the bottle).
Second time, I wore the poly gloves. Makes it a little harder to handle the
teflon tape, but my skin feels(and smells) much better. Box of 100 was
around $7. They're poly and not latex, so latex allergy is not a problem
and when you're done, just strip them off and into the trash can. So far
I've found that they're impervious to mineral spirits, motor oil, grease and
brake fluid.

Patrick
 
> May I suggest a large pumper oil can (the type used by the
> engineer on the old steam engines) filled with brake fluid.

Might try that if my session last night with the vacuum bleeder didn't pay
off. Finished up late and decided to wait til tonight to start her up and
try the pedal.

Patrick
 
Patrick:

If you're interested, I have a procedure for bleeding disc brake's that
Bobby Moore and I discussed during a Bull Session seminar at MYR.

I assume you have a helper during your bleeding attempts??

Paul Bartz

From: Patrick.Flowers
[mailto:Patrick.Flowers]
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 1999 12:41 PM
Subject: RE: GMC: bleeding brakes

May I suggest a large pumper oil can (the type used by the engineer on the
old steam engines) filled with brake fluid.

Might try that if my session last night with the vacuum bleeder didn't pay
off. Finished up late and decided to wait til tonight to start her up and
try the pedal.
 
Bartz, Paul
>
> Patrick:
>
> If you're interested, I have a procedure for bleeding disc
> brake's that Bobby Moore and I discussed during a Bull
> Session seminar at MYR.

I'm always open to suggestions! I wish I could have hung around MB for your
session.

> I assume you have a helper during your bleeding attempts??

Most of the time, I'm working by myself. That's one of the reasons that I
like the vacuum bleeder. I've just never used it on this large a scale.

Patrick
 
I was anticipating you'd ask for it and I'm copying it from our paper notes
into a MS Word file that I'll e-mail to you. You can put it on your site
then, if you want.

Give me a couple hours.

Paul

From: Patrick.Flowers
[mailto:Patrick.Flowers]
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 1999 2:13 PM
Subject: RE: GMC: bleeding brakes

Bartz, Paul

Patrick:

If you're interested, I have a procedure for bleeding disc brake's that
Bobby Moore and I discussed during a Bull Session seminar at MYR.

I'm always open to suggestions! I wish I could have hung around MB for your
session.

I assume you have a helper during your bleeding attempts??

Most of the time, I'm working by myself. That's one of the reasons that I
like the vacuum bleeder. I've just never used it on this large a scale.

Patrick
 
Dick:

Put on my six-wheel disc brake system at MYR in 1995, 40,000+ miles ago and
haven't had an emergency brake since. I do have a hydraulic line lock
system to install one of these days, though. I haven't got there yet. You
just have to be careful were you park.

Paul Bartz

From: Richard Bachert [mailto:bachert]
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 1999 5:32 PM
Subject: RE: GMC: bleeding brakes

Patrick, You have my undivided attention with the comment that you were
"...using non-parking brake calipers on all four..." I guess my question is
how is that possible? Is it your understanding that the "Park" feature of
the xmission is all you need for this purpose?

Getting ready to do the "TSM Shuffle" myself and very interested in your
comments.

BTW -- anyone ELSE who has done the TSM Shuffle is encouraged to chime in on
this one. Watching an empty GMC roll down the street is such a drag.

Patrick,
are you doing TSM brakes?
If so, be sure holes are straight up vertical, i.e. caliper off.

Yep, doin' the TSM shuffle - tough dancin' with a partner that has six
feet. I'm using non-parking brake calipers on all four, so I was able to
mount them upright. Still, it's tough just getting all the air out of the
lines. I'm using a vacuum bleeder and borrowed your trick for wrapping the
bleeders with teflon tape.
 
>
> Patrick, You have my undivided attention with the comment
> that you were "...using non-parking brake calipers on all
> four..." I guess my question is how is that possible?
> Is it your understanding that the "Park" feature of the
> xmission is all you need for this purpose?

Let me preface any comments by saying what I've done is an individual
decision after much thought and may not be appropriate for you. I've got
some pretty strong opinions on this subject and they're just that - my
opinions. Next I'll admit that the one facet of the GMC that I can't stand
is the rear brakes. IMO, the coach screamed "give me disc brakes" when I
first looked under those big drums. The factory parking brake is a joke and
I don't think I've ever met more than one or two people who can truthfully
say that they use the thing on a regular basis. Even if they do, I'll wager
that the "Park" pawl in the transmission is doing most of the work. Don't
even kid yourself into thinking that Johnson bar is an emergency brake - IMO
it'll only give you something to do until impact. Like I said - strong
opinions.

The calipers that TSM sells with the parking brake have 50mm pistons. The
non-parking brake calipers have 60mm pistons. That's an extra 20% of
braking pressure for a slight amount of additional pedal movement(probably
imperceptible). If I were going to use the park brake calipers, I would use
them on the rear wheels only, thus giving some bias to the center wheels and
avoiding the strange mounting attitudes required to make the cable
arrangement on the center wheels work. One of the endearing features of
disc brakes is that they don't lock easily, which also makes them poor
parking brakes.

I'm planning to use a hydraulic "line lock" to hold the vehicle prior to
chocking the wheels, if I feel the precaution is necessary. I'm sure that
Paul Bartz will offer some comments about his brakes. He has the Leigh
Harrison disc conversion, which is the ultimate in brakes for the GMC
IMO(see the pictures on my site from the Marion NC GMCMI rally). However,
Leigh's system is about twice as expensive as the TSM conversion, especially
if you include the P30 master cylinder(which is probably necessary with that
huge center caliper he uses). I've driven Leigh's coach and two GMC's with
factory brakes. I'll be very interested to see how my coach with the TSM
conversion compares.

More to come,
Patrick
 
> The calipers that TSM sells with the parking brake have 50mm
> pistons. The non-parking brake calipers have 60mm pistons.
> That's an extra 20% of braking pressure for a slight amount
> of additional pedal movement(probably imperceptible).

I knew I couldn't make that long a post with screwing something up. It's
actually 44% more braking pressure. My calc's:

50mm surface area: 25^2*3.14=1963mm^2
60mm surface area: 30^2*3.14=2826mm^2
2826/1963=1.44

Patrick
 
Patrick, You have my undivided attention with the comment that you were
"...using non-parking brake calipers on all four..." I guess my question is
how is that possible? Is it your understanding that the "Park" feature of
the xmission is all you need for this purpose?
Getting ready to do the "TSM Shuffle" myself and very interested in your
comments.
Thanks.
BTW -- anyone ELSE who has done the TSM Shuffle is encouraged to chime in on
this one. Watching an empty GMC roll down the street is such a drag.
Dick 75 PB in Atlanta

>>
>> Patrick,
>> are you doing TSM brakes?
>> If so, be sure holes are straight up vertical, i.e. caliper off.
>
>Yep, doin' the TSM shuffle - tough dancin' with a partner that has six
>feet. I'm using non-parking brake calipers on all four, so I was able to
>mount them upright. Still, it's tough just getting all the air out of the
>lines. I'm using a vacuum bleeder and borrowed your trick for wrapping the
>bleeders with teflon tape.
>
>BTW - I don't know if you guys remember the box of disposable poly gloves I
>picked up at Home Depot when I rebuilt my hubs and CV's. My first try at
>bleeding the brakes was barehanded(yeah - I know... I read the bottle).
>Second time, I wore the poly gloves. Makes it a little harder to handle the
>teflon tape, but my skin feels(and smells) much better. Box of 100 was
>around $7. They're poly and not latex, so latex allergy is not a problem
>and when you're done, just strip them off and into the trash can. So far
>I've found that they're impervious to mineral spirits, motor oil, grease and
>brake fluid.
>
>Patrick
>
 
Strongly recommend that if your brake fluid is two years old or older to
take your GMC to a good tire and brake shop and have them pressure bleed
each wheel. It is not very expensive cosidering they do each wheel
check all the wheel cylinders and master and completely fill with new
fluids. I paid $ 45.00 and while they were doing it had a nice cup of
coffee and conversation with some other customers. They are all using
Dri Wash Now. Seeing is believing. Incidentally the step picture
should be coming your way tonight, I have a polaroid on its way here
and one of my friends will assist me with the pictures. Thanks Chuck
 
Emery, Clairvoyance must also be one of your many talents. :-)
You must have been reading my mind as this was precisely the mental calculus
I was attempting to resolve when your post crossed my screen. I was torn
between the higher efficiency of the larger dia pistons on the non-parking
cals and my instinctive, gut feeling that a parking brake is a good thing.
Besides, I WANT something to do while awaiting impact: Weeping and screaming
hysterically is SOOOO unmanly. Repeatedly pulling on the brake handle will
at least give my passengers that I'm TRYING to get the situation back under
control.
It reminds me of the bit of alleged humor sent my way a while back:
"When I die, I want to go peacefully, in my sleep just like my grandfather
- -- not screaming like the passengers in his car."

The folks who opt to not have the parking brake must have better contol of
their emotions -- not to mention their bowels -- than moi.
Thanks for tipping me in the direction I shall now go with TSM.
Dick 75 PB (for parking brake) in Atlanta

>
>In a message dated 4/6/1999 1:05:24 PM, Patrick.Flowers
>writes:
>
>non-parking brake calipers have 60mm pistons. That's an extra 20% of
>braking pressure >>
>
>Patrick, actually more than that. The total pressure on the piston is based
>on the area of the piston. If you square the radius of the 50mm it is 25
>squared or 625. The 60 mm piston gives 900. Therefore the increase in
>pressure on the piston is 900/625 = 1.44, or 44% more.
>
>When I ordered the rear parking brakes I had already thought of this but I
>also know that in braking the GMC shifts more weight to the front bogie
>wheels and the rear wheels do a much smaller effort in braking the vehicle.
>Thus my decision to use the non-parking brakes on the front wheels. I am
>making the assumption that the disc brakes will do a much better job than the
>shoes and drums. Besides that, how many drum brakes on the typical GMC are
>adjusted properly to give factory fresh braking? We don't back up enough at
>a sufficient speed to operate the star wheel adjusters and often they are
>frozen anyway. How many GMCers actually get under the motorhome every couple
>of thousand miles to manually adjust their brakes? I will never have to
>adjust my rear brakes again as the pedal height gets closer to the floor. It
>will be a simple job to replace the disc pads as compared to replacing the
>shoes.
>
>I won't get my kit for about another two weeks but I post my results after it
>gets installed.
>
>Emery Stora
>77 Kingsley
>Santa Fe, NM
>
 
At the Albuquerque Rally, I have planned two driving events. One for the
coaches to test our ability to drive around a ste course. The second one might
be of interest to you Patrick. I have a plan for a brake test track. Idea is
to go about 30MPH and go past a marker and apply the brakes. Measure how
far/long it takes. That way you can see what different coaches with disc,
brake gurards, drums, tsm, leigh etc have to offer. The only consession is
that I am not responsible for the fight you will have with the other half when
the household stuff goes from the back of the coach to the front dinette.
Al

> >
> > Patrick, You have my undivided attention with the comment
> > that you were "...using non-parking brake calipers on all
> > four..." I guess my question is how is that possible?
> > Is it your understanding that the "Park" feature of the
> > xmission is all you need for this purpose?
>
> Let me preface any comments by saying what I've done is an individual
> decision after much thought and may not be appropriate for you. I've got
> some pretty strong opinions on this subject and they're just that - my
> opinions. Next I'll admit that the one facet of the GMC that I can't stand
> is the rear brakes. IMO, the coach screamed "give me disc brakes" when I
> first looked under those big drums. The factory parking brake is a joke and
> I don't think I've ever met more than one or two people who can truthfully
> say that they use the thing on a regular basis. Even if they do, I'll wager
> that the "Park" pawl in the transmission is doing most of the work. Don't
> even kid yourself into thinking that Johnson bar is an emergency brake - IMO
> it'll only give you something to do until impact. Like I said - strong
> opinions.
>
> The calipers that TSM sells with the parking brake have 50mm pistons. The
> non-parking brake calipers have 60mm pistons. That's an extra 20% of
> braking pressure for a slight amount of additional pedal movement(probably
> imperceptible). If I were going to use the park brake calipers, I would use
> them on the rear wheels only, thus giving some bias to the center wheels and
> avoiding the strange mounting attitudes required to make the cable
> arrangement on the center wheels work. One of the endearing features of
> disc brakes is that they don't lock easily, which also makes them poor
> parking brakes.
>
> I'm planning to use a hydraulic "line lock" to hold the vehicle prior to
> chocking the wheels, if I feel the precaution is necessary. I'm sure that
> Paul Bartz will offer some comments about his brakes. He has the Leigh
> Harrison disc conversion, which is the ultimate in brakes for the GMC
> IMO(see the pictures on my site from the Marion NC GMCMI rally). However,
> Leigh's system is about twice as expensive as the TSM conversion, especially
> if you include the P30 master cylinder(which is probably necessary with that
> huge center caliper he uses). I've driven Leigh's coach and two GMC's with
> factory brakes. I'll be very interested to see how my coach with the TSM
> conversion compares.
>
> More to come,
> Patrick
 
Am I to assume that helmets would be required to avoid flying canned goods,
etc??? Maybe one of the Air Force Cargo nets stretched across would be
useful.

>At the Albuquerque Rally, I have planned two driving events. One for the
>coaches to test our ability to drive around a ste course. The second one
might
>be of interest to you Patrick. I have a plan for a brake test track.
Idea is
>to go about 30MPH and go past a marker and apply the brakes. Measure how
>far/long it takes. That way you can see what different coaches with disc,
>brake gurards, drums, tsm, leigh etc have to offer. The only consession is
>that I am not responsible for the fight you will have with the other half
when
>the household stuff goes from the back of the coach to the front dinette.
>Al
>

>

>> >
>> > Patrick, You have my undivided attention with the comment
>> > that you were "...using non-parking brake calipers on all
>> > four..." I guess my question is how is that possible?
>> > Is it your understanding that the "Park" feature of the
>> > xmission is all you need for this purpose?
>>
>> Let me preface any comments by saying what I've done is an individual
>> decision after much thought and may not be appropriate for you. I've got
>> some pretty strong opinions on this subject and they're just that - my
>> opinions. Next I'll admit that the one facet of the GMC that I can't stand
>> is the rear brakes. IMO, the coach screamed "give me disc brakes" when I
>> first looked under those big drums. The factory parking brake is a joke
and
>> I don't think I've ever met more than one or two people who can truthfully
>> say that they use the thing on a regular basis. Even if they do, I'll
wager
>> that the "Park" pawl in the transmission is doing most of the work. Don't
>> even kid yourself into thinking that Johnson bar is an emergency brake -
IMO
>> it'll only give you something to do until impact. Like I said - strong
>> opinions.
>>
>> The calipers that TSM sells with the parking brake have 50mm pistons. The
>> non-parking brake calipers have 60mm pistons. That's an extra 20% of
>> braking pressure for a slight amount of additional pedal movement(probably
>> imperceptible). If I were going to use the park brake calipers, I would
use
>> them on the rear wheels only, thus giving some bias to the center wheels
and
>> avoiding the strange mounting attitudes required to make the cable
>> arrangement on the center wheels work. One of the endearing features of
>> disc brakes is that they don't lock easily, which also makes them poor
>> parking brakes.
>>
>> I'm planning to use a hydraulic "line lock" to hold the vehicle prior to
>> chocking the wheels, if I feel the precaution is necessary. I'm sure that
>> Paul Bartz will offer some comments about his brakes. He has the Leigh
>> Harrison disc conversion, which is the ultimate in brakes for the GMC
>> IMO(see the pictures on my site from the Marion NC GMCMI rally). However,
>> Leigh's system is about twice as expensive as the TSM conversion,
especially
>> if you include the P30 master cylinder(which is probably necessary with
that
>> huge center caliper he uses). I've driven Leigh's coach and two GMC's with
>> factory brakes. I'll be very interested to see how my coach with the TSM
>> conversion compares.
>>
>> More to come,
>> Patrick
>
 
With all the talk about bad emergency brakes, I wonder if I should have a cargo
net stretched at the end of the course to catch those whose brakes don't stop in
time.
al

> Am I to assume that helmets would be required to avoid flying canned goods,
> etc??? Maybe one of the Air Force Cargo nets stretched across would be
> useful.
>

> >At the Albuquerque Rally, I have planned two driving events. One for the
> >coaches to test our ability to drive around a ste course. The second one
> might
> >be of interest to you Patrick. I have a plan for a brake test track.
> Idea is
> >to go about 30MPH and go past a marker and apply the brakes. Measure how
> >far/long it takes. That way you can see what different coaches with disc,
> >brake gurards, drums, tsm, leigh etc have to offer. The only consession is
> >that I am not responsible for the fight you will have with the other half
> when
> >the household stuff goes from the back of the coach to the front dinette.
> >Al
> >

> >

> >> >
> >> > Patrick, You have my undivided attention with the comment
> >> > that you were "...using non-parking brake calipers on all
> >> > four..." I guess my question is how is that possible?
> >> > Is it your understanding that the "Park" feature of the
> >> > xmission is all you need for this purpose?
> >>
> >> Let me preface any comments by saying what I've done is an individual
> >> decision after much thought and may not be appropriate for you. I've got
> >> some pretty strong opinions on this subject and they're just that - my
> >> opinions. Next I'll admit that the one facet of the GMC that I can't stand
> >> is the rear brakes. IMO, the coach screamed "give me disc brakes" when I
> >> first looked under those big drums. The factory parking brake is a joke
> and
> >> I don't think I've ever met more than one or two people who can truthfully
> >> say that they use the thing on a regular basis. Even if they do, I'll
> wager
> >> that the "Park" pawl in the transmission is doing most of the work. Don't
> >> even kid yourself into thinking that Johnson bar is an emergency brake -
> IMO
> >> it'll only give you something to do until impact. Like I said - strong
> >> opinions.
> >>
> >> The calipers that TSM sells with the parking brake have 50mm pistons. The
> >> non-parking brake calipers have 60mm pistons. That's an extra 20% of
> >> braking pressure for a slight amount of additional pedal movement(probably
> >> imperceptible). If I were going to use the park brake calipers, I would
> use
> >> them on the rear wheels only, thus giving some bias to the center wheels
> and
> >> avoiding the strange mounting attitudes required to make the cable
> >> arrangement on the center wheels work. One of the endearing features of
> >> disc brakes is that they don't lock easily, which also makes them poor
> >> parking brakes.
> >>
> >> I'm planning to use a hydraulic "line lock" to hold the vehicle prior to
> >> chocking the wheels, if I feel the precaution is necessary. I'm sure that
> >> Paul Bartz will offer some comments about his brakes. He has the Leigh
> >> Harrison disc conversion, which is the ultimate in brakes for the GMC
> >> IMO(see the pictures on my site from the Marion NC GMCMI rally). However,
> >> Leigh's system is about twice as expensive as the TSM conversion,
> especially
> >> if you include the P30 master cylinder(which is probably necessary with
> that
> >> huge center caliper he uses). I've driven Leigh's coach and two GMC's with
> >> factory brakes. I'll be very interested to see how my coach with the TSM
> >> conversion compares.
> >>
> >> More to come,
> >> Patrick
> >
 
Al,
Actually, I had thought about a tail hook with a plow head! You know, that
would be a great idea for an event at the next Intl. Rally, or maybe the
get together upcoming on the west coast. It would be pretty neat to
actually documant the results on brake improvements! The cargo nets,
helmet & tail hook may be required by the insurance folks plus the standard
28 page waiver and a 1 mile slow down uphill ramp at the end.

Hey, I'll sponsor something like that- I'm a turnip!

Jim Bounds
- ----------------------

>With all the talk about bad emergency brakes, I wonder if I should have a
cargo
>net stretched at the end of the course to catch those whose brakes don't
stop in
>time.
>al
>

>
>> Am I to assume that helmets would be required to avoid flying canned goods,
>> etc??? Maybe one of the Air Force Cargo nets stretched across would be
>> useful.
>>

>> >At the Albuquerque Rally, I have planned two driving events. One for the
>> >coaches to test our ability to drive around a ste course. The second one
>> might
>> >be of interest to you Patrick. I have a plan for a brake test track.
>> Idea is
>> >to go about 30MPH and go past a marker and apply the brakes. Measure how
>> >far/long it takes. That way you can see what different coaches with disc,
>> >brake gurards, drums, tsm, leigh etc have to offer. The only
consession is
>> >that I am not responsible for the fight you will have with the other half
>> when
>> >the household stuff goes from the back of the coach to the front dinette.
>> >Al
>> >

>> >

>> >> >
>> >> > Patrick, You have my undivided attention with the comment
>> >> > that you were "...using non-parking brake calipers on all
>> >> > four..." I guess my question is how is that possible?
>> >> > Is it your understanding that the "Park" feature of the
>> >> > xmission is all you need for this purpose?
>> >>
>> >> Let me preface any comments by saying what I've done is an individual
>> >> decision after much thought and may not be appropriate for you. I've
got
>> >> some pretty strong opinions on this subject and they're just that - my
>> >> opinions. Next I'll admit that the one facet of the GMC that I can't
stand
>> >> is the rear brakes. IMO, the coach screamed "give me disc brakes"
when I
>> >> first looked under those big drums. The factory parking brake is a joke
>> and
>> >> I don't think I've ever met more than one or two people who can
truthfully
>> >> say that they use the thing on a regular basis. Even if they do, I'll
>> wager
>> >> that the "Park" pawl in the transmission is doing most of the work.
Don't
>> >> even kid yourself into thinking that Johnson bar is an emergency brake -
>> IMO
>> >> it'll only give you something to do until impact. Like I said - strong
>> >> opinions.
>> >>
>> >> The calipers that TSM sells with the parking brake have 50mm pistons.
The
>> >> non-parking brake calipers have 60mm pistons. That's an extra 20% of
>> >> braking pressure for a slight amount of additional pedal
movement(probably
>> >> imperceptible). If I were going to use the park brake calipers, I would
>> use
>> >> them on the rear wheels only, thus giving some bias to the center wheels
>> and
>> >> avoiding the strange mounting attitudes required to make the cable
>> >> arrangement on the center wheels work. One of the endearing features of
>> >> disc brakes is that they don't lock easily, which also makes them poor
>> >> parking brakes.
>> >>
>> >> I'm planning to use a hydraulic "line lock" to hold the vehicle prior to
>> >> chocking the wheels, if I feel the precaution is necessary. I'm sure
that
>> >> Paul Bartz will offer some comments about his brakes. He has the Leigh
>> >> Harrison disc conversion, which is the ultimate in brakes for the GMC
>> >> IMO(see the pictures on my site from the Marion NC GMCMI rally).
However,
>> >> Leigh's system is about twice as expensive as the TSM conversion,
>> especially
>> >> if you include the P30 master cylinder(which is probably necessary with
>> that
>> >> huge center caliper he uses). I've driven Leigh's coach and two
GMC's with
>> >> factory brakes. I'll be very interested to see how my coach with the
TSM
>> >> conversion compares.
>> >>
>> >> More to come,
>> >> Patrick
>> >
>
>
>
Jim Bounds/Co-op Motor Works Orlando www.gmccoop.com
 
I wish we had a Navy base here so I could ask to borrow some tail hooks. I think
an anchor chain and hook would do well for an emergency brake. If mounded over
the spare tire, a quick disconnect and you would stop..might want to get a
shoulder belt and crash helmet to keep you from going out the front.
Al

> Al,
> Actually, I had thought about a tail hook with a plow head! You know, that
> would be a great idea for an event at the next Intl. Rally, or maybe the
> get together upcoming on the west coast. It would be pretty neat to
> actually documant the results on brake improvements! The cargo nets,
> helmet & tail hook may be required by the insurance folks plus the standard
> 28 page waiver and a 1 mile slow down uphill ramp at the end.
>
> Hey, I'll sponsor something like that- I'm a turnip!
>
> Jim Bounds
> ----------------------

> >With all the talk about bad emergency brakes, I wonder if I should have a
> cargo
> >net stretched at the end of the course to catch those whose brakes don't
> stop in
> >time.
> >al
> >

> >
> >> Am I to assume that helmets would be required to avoid flying canned goods,
> >> etc??? Maybe one of the Air Force Cargo nets stretched across would be
> >> useful.
> >>

> >> >At the Albuquerque Rally, I have planned two driving events. One for the
> >> >coaches to test our ability to drive around a ste course. The second one
> >> might
> >> >be of interest to you Patrick. I have a plan for a brake test track.
> >> Idea is
> >> >to go about 30MPH and go past a marker and apply the brakes. Measure how
> >> >far/long it takes. That way you can see what different coaches with disc,
> >> >brake gurards, drums, tsm, leigh etc have to offer. The only
> consession is
> >> >that I am not responsible for the fight you will have with the other half
> >> when
> >> >the household stuff goes from the back of the coach to the front dinette.
> >> >Al
> >> >

> >> >

> >> >> >
> >> >> > Patrick, You have my undivided attention with the comment
> >> >> > that you were "...using non-parking brake calipers on all
> >> >> > four..." I guess my question is how is that possible?
> >> >> > Is it your understanding that the "Park" feature of the
> >> >> > xmission is all you need for this purpose?
> >> >>
> >> >> Let me preface any comments by saying what I've done is an individual
> >> >> decision after much thought and may not be appropriate for you. I've
> got
> >> >> some pretty strong opinions on this subject and they're just that - my
> >> >> opinions. Next I'll admit that the one facet of the GMC that I can't
> stand
> >> >> is the rear brakes. IMO, the coach screamed "give me disc brakes"
> when I
> >> >> first looked under those big drums. The factory parking brake is a joke
> >> and
> >> >> I don't think I've ever met more than one or two people who can
> truthfully
> >> >> say that they use the thing on a regular basis. Even if they do, I'll
> >> wager
> >> >> that the "Park" pawl in the transmission is doing most of the work.
> Don't
> >> >> even kid yourself into thinking that Johnson bar is an emergency brake -
> >> IMO
> >> >> it'll only give you something to do until impact. Like I said - strong
> >> >> opinions.
> >> >>
> >> >> The calipers that TSM sells with the parking brake have 50mm pistons.
> The
> >> >> non-parking brake calipers have 60mm pistons. That's an extra 20% of
> >> >> braking pressure for a slight amount of additional pedal
> movement(probably
> >> >> imperceptible). If I were going to use the park brake calipers, I would
> >> use
> >> >> them on the rear wheels only, thus giving some bias to the center wheels
> >> and
> >> >> avoiding the strange mounting attitudes required to make the cable
> >> >> arrangement on the center wheels work. One of the endearing features of
> >> >> disc brakes is that they don't lock easily, which also makes them poor
> >> >> parking brakes.
> >> >>
> >> >> I'm planning to use a hydraulic "line lock" to hold the vehicle prior to
> >> >> chocking the wheels, if I feel the precaution is necessary. I'm sure
> that
> >> >> Paul Bartz will offer some comments about his brakes. He has the Leigh
> >> >> Harrison disc conversion, which is the ultimate in brakes for the GMC
> >> >> IMO(see the pictures on my site from the Marion NC GMCMI rally).
> However,
> >> >> Leigh's system is about twice as expensive as the TSM conversion,
> >> especially
> >> >> if you include the P30 master cylinder(which is probably necessary with
> >> that
> >> >> huge center caliper he uses). I've driven Leigh's coach and two
> GMC's with
> >> >> factory brakes. I'll be very interested to see how my coach with the
> TSM
> >> >> conversion compares.
> >> >>
> >> >> More to come,
> >> >> Patrick
> >> >
> >
> >
> >
> Jim Bounds/Co-op Motor Works Orlando www.gmccoop.com
 
I was starting to feel like I was weird until Rick chimed in. I also use my
parking brake every time I park. I find that the PARK function of the
transmission does not always work. The parking brake does seem to stop the
my coach from rolling. I must admit I cheat however, because I also will use
chock blocks if I have any doubt about the ability of the barking brakes
and/or PARK function to keep it from rolling (in other words if I am on any kind
of hill or incline). I am not sure if I could count on the parking brake to be
of much assistance in the event I have a hydraulic brake failure.

Also, I want to keep the parking brake from rusting up and not working at all.
Richard Waters
76 Palm Beach
Troy, MI
- -----

> I Hate to jump in on the other side, but I use my parking brake EVERY time I
> park. After 3 seasons of exercise and new shoes, it now holds the coach from
> rolling back in my driveway, unaided. (Forward holding is better than
> reverse.) Planning on new cables this summer, expect further improvement. I
> intend to keep after my E-brake until I can stop the coach with it.
>
>
 
And there is, of course, the comment made by one of the netters about the
potential for a delay/damage by having the park pawl locking up in the
xmission requiring a tow truck (or another GMC) to bump or haul the rig
backwards enough to get it out of "Park."
Been there, done that... Will never again park in any serious nose down
attitude. If we couldn't park in a fairly level attitude, we just kept
movin' on. The key for me is if the parking brake (drum OR disc) can't hold
the coach on the incline, it doesn't go into "Park" because it'll creep into
and load the pawl and probably lock her up.
Dick 75 PB in Atlanta

>I was starting to feel like I was weird until Rick chimed in. I also use my
>parking brake every time I park. I find that the PARK function of the
>transmission does not always work. The parking brake does seem to stop the
>my coach from rolling. I must admit I cheat however, because I also will use
>chock blocks if I have any doubt about the ability of the barking brakes
>and/or PARK function to keep it from rolling (in other words if I am on any
kind
>of hill or incline). I am not sure if I could count on the parking brake to be
>of much assistance in the event I have a hydraulic brake failure.
>
>Also, I want to keep the parking brake from rusting up and not working at all.
>Richard Waters
>76 Palm Beach
>Troy, MI
>-----
>

>
>> I Hate to jump in on the other side, but I use my parking brake EVERY
time I
>> park. After 3 seasons of exercise and new shoes, it now holds the coach from
>> rolling back in my driveway, unaided. (Forward holding is better than
>> reverse.) Planning on new cables this summer, expect further improvement. I
>> intend to keep after my E-brake until I can stop the coach with it.
>>
>>
>
>