Emery, in digest # 408 you said:
"The Revcon did not use the GMC Chassis or GMC body. They had an all aluminum
body. They also were made in a 33 foot configuration. They used a 454
engine. The only thing in common were the use of a Toronado front end."
And David G. said:
"Completely different but used the GM front end, etc. Clark-Cortez also
used the GM 455 and front wheel drive package. After 1977 Revcon went to
a rear drive in a 31' model. They were pretty nice coaches but not a GMC!"
The use of the term "Toronado front end" prompts a question. I thought the
Revcons used the front portion of a 4 wheel drive to get the power to the
front wheels. If they used the sprockets and chain to go thru a TH425 etc.,
why can't we adapt a 454 to our GMCs? Seems like the 454's are much more
available and are more up to date (EFI, Vortec, etc.).
Who has the answer?
Dave (& Dege), '76 Royale, Santa Barbara, CA ("digesters")
"The Revcon did not use the GMC Chassis or GMC body. They had an all aluminum
body. They also were made in a 33 foot configuration. They used a 454
engine. The only thing in common were the use of a Toronado front end."
And David G. said:
"Completely different but used the GM front end, etc. Clark-Cortez also
used the GM 455 and front wheel drive package. After 1977 Revcon went to
a rear drive in a 31' model. They were pretty nice coaches but not a GMC!"
The use of the term "Toronado front end" prompts a question. I thought the
Revcons used the front portion of a 4 wheel drive to get the power to the
front wheels. If they used the sprockets and chain to go thru a TH425 etc.,
why can't we adapt a 454 to our GMCs? Seems like the 454's are much more
available and are more up to date (EFI, Vortec, etc.).
Who has the answer?
Dave (& Dege), '76 Royale, Santa Barbara, CA ("digesters")