>From what I understand, the DOT line has UV stabilizers in it for the
outdoor use it is going to get. I would also think there must be some
abrasion standards it must meet as well. These standards that the line
must meet make it suitable for vehicles. They might be met by other non
DOT lines as well, but you just can't be sure. Since the difference only
works out to $30-$40 for the complete job, I would suggest using the DOT
line and not trying to save anything here. I would also suggest using new
DOT fittings for similar reasons. The time it is going to take to install
new air lines really is far more costly than the difference in cheap line
and DOT line. Air lines and fittings are those $2 parts that you don't
want to have fail and strand you on the side of the road.
Zak
>Now do we need DOT approved line?
outdoor use it is going to get. I would also think there must be some
abrasion standards it must meet as well. These standards that the line
must meet make it suitable for vehicles. They might be met by other non
DOT lines as well, but you just can't be sure. Since the difference only
works out to $30-$40 for the complete job, I would suggest using the DOT
line and not trying to save anything here. I would also suggest using new
DOT fittings for similar reasons. The time it is going to take to install
new air lines really is far more costly than the difference in cheap line
and DOT line. Air lines and fittings are those $2 parts that you don't
want to have fail and strand you on the side of the road.
Zak
>Now do we need DOT approved line?