Hi Scott --
The 307 is standard.
Generally, only those who seek more power/economy/performance or need a new
final drive have changed. Greenberg has >500k on the original unit, so don't
sweat it.
The change puts the engine at ~2500 rpm, the peak of its torque/power curve.
You either change the final gears themselves, or the engine/tranny sprockets
and chain.
Hope this helps. BTW: Keep listening to your girl friend!
Mark
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gmcmotorhome
> [mailto
wner-gmcmotorhome]On Behalf Of Adohen
> Sent: Saturday, May 29, 1999 4:01 PM
> To: gmcmotorhome
> Subject: Re: GMC: Cinnabar 3.42 vs Caspro 3.55
>
>
> In a message dated 5/29/99 3:07:54 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> powerjon
>
> > The
> > choice is really yours, because they are are all good choices depending
> > on how much you really what to spend.
>
> So the 307 is not good enough for the motorhome? Does anybody
> have a 307 in
> there motorhome or am I the only one? I do what my girlfirend
> tells me to
> do
, Its better than rice crispies.
>
> Scott
The 307 is standard.
Generally, only those who seek more power/economy/performance or need a new
final drive have changed. Greenberg has >500k on the original unit, so don't
sweat it.
The change puts the engine at ~2500 rpm, the peak of its torque/power curve.
You either change the final gears themselves, or the engine/tranny sprockets
and chain.
Hope this helps. BTW: Keep listening to your girl friend!
Mark
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gmcmotorhome
> [mailto
wner-gmcmotorhome]On Behalf Of Adohen> Sent: Saturday, May 29, 1999 4:01 PM
> To: gmcmotorhome
> Subject: Re: GMC: Cinnabar 3.42 vs Caspro 3.55
>
>
> In a message dated 5/29/99 3:07:54 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> powerjon
>
> > The
> > choice is really yours, because they are are all good choices depending
> > on how much you really what to spend.
>
> So the 307 is not good enough for the motorhome? Does anybody
> have a 307 in
> there motorhome or am I the only one? I do what my girlfirend
> tells me to
> do
, Its better than rice crispies.>
> Scott
