Wiggle Waggle and Castor

larry & kaye kepple

New member
Jan 4, 1999
28
0
0
This is a follow up to the message posted below a few weeks ago. I had
the offset bushings installed and they increased the castor up to
2.5-3.0 deg. Unfortunately it didn't help the wig wag like I was sure it
would. Jim Bounds also thought this would fix it. Interestingly when I
drop the old girls ass in the back I still get rid of most of the wig
wag. Right now I am not sure what to do next. Just getting ready to take
a trip from Redding CA to Seattle and then to northern Idaho and back to
Redding. If anyone spots a yellow GMC with its tail down on that route,
its me.

Subject:
Wiggle Waggle & Castor Alignment
Date:
Mon, 14 Jun 1999 22:21:10 -0700
From:
Larry & Kaye Kepple
To:
GMC MAIL LIST
CC:
Gene FISHER

I have had my 73 GMC for about a year. It has always wandered. Its sort
of like a big fat boy on a water bed going around corners. Ruts and
pavement edges cause a sway and you tend to oversteer. I have replaced
all the steering components such as:
1. Hydraulic Steering Dampener.
2. Upper and Lower Control Arm Bushings
3. Ball Joints
4. Stabilizer Bushings
5. Steering Gear Box (first a rebuilt and then a new one from
Cinnabar)
6. CV joint in steering column
7. 6 wheel alignment including adjustment of rear camber
8. New tires and Alcoa Wheels
9. Previous owner had replced rear bogie pins and I have checked for
loosness
10. Idler arm and bushing

All of this work made for a very nice tight steering system but the
wander never changed much. Early on in my replacement work I discussed
the problem with Jim Bounds and with Wes Caughlin. Wes thought it was
the steering box per his recent article.Jim suggested I get anything
loose in the steering fixed and be sure and set the castor right. He
said to set it at +2.5 deg. which is upper end of limits recommended in
manual. I told the guy doing the 6 Wheel align. to set it that way early

in my replacement sequence. But recently when I went back for a check on

the alignment I found out that he only set it at 1 deg. because he said
that is all he could get without getting the camber out of limits. Then
after doing some checking he said that GMC makes an offset upper control

arm bushing that would allow them to probably get the 2.5 deg. However
that meant changing the upper control arm bushings which had already
been replaced and a new alignment.The cost will be $300 for the offset
bushing replacement plus another $100 for another front wheel alignment.

So I said I would think about it.
Then I got an idea and tried a little experiment. If I drop the rear

end at center of tandems 3" below the normal height I should pick up 1
deg. of castor. So I tried it. The old girl was really setting on her
ass and I thought this was a silly test especially since the air bag
pressure would be quite a bit lower than the 90 PSI I typically run to
get the correct factory ride height.
I was absolutely amazed at the difference. It made the steering and
stability much better and I believe you would get few complaints from
the handling. Believe me I wouldn't have done all this steering work had

it been this way. I raised it up and down twice to verify I wasn't
fooling myself. Each time I raised it the wander would come back and my
passengers were also amazed at the difference they felt in rear end
sway.
So now I am convinced it is the lack of castor. Jim Bounds said they
will wander all over with out the full positive castor and now I believe

it. But I thought I would ask for opinions before I spend the $400.
I am still interested in the 4 bag suspension, but I have always said
I am going to get the steering as right as it can be first before I make

that decision.
 
Hi Larry

>This is a follow up to the message posted below a few weeks ago. I had
>the offset bushings installed and they increased the castor up to
>2.5-3.0 deg. Unfortunately it didn't help the wig wag like I was sure it
>would. Jim Bounds also thought this would fix it. Interestingly when I
>drop the old girls ass in the back I still get rid of most of the wig
>wag. Right now I am not sure what to do next. Just getting ready to take
>a trip from Redding CA to Seattle and then to northern Idaho and back to
>Redding. If anyone spots a yellow GMC with its tail down on that route,
>its me.

Something that comes to mind is rear toe and roll steer-

Besides the effort involved in a six wheel alignment, few shops consider the
suspension geometry when performing alignments on independent suspensions.

I'm not intimately acquainted with the GMC rear suspension, but it is
typical of most modern suspensions since about 1955 to steer the rear tires
INTO a turn as the body rolls outward. This is accomplished by having the
suspension toe in slightly as it is compressed. If this effect is tuned
right, the effect is that the vehicle steers into the turn slightly at the
rear as it rounds a curve, and this greatly increases stability.

Another consideration is it is perfectly possible to have every axle 'toed
in' correctly but to not have the rear axles aimed at the front wheels. One
or both rear axles attempting to dog track could be a very uneasy feeling
coach.

As lowering ride height seems to sort this out, perhaps the extra toe in
afforded (possibly) by reduced ride height helps stabilize the GMC? Is it
possible the rear alignment was performed on a lower than ride height
suspension (i.e. low pressure in the air systems) or with the vehicle
supported to gain easier access to fasteners etc at a height considerably
different than stock/loaded? The extra caster and lowered center of gravity
from lowered suspension should be miniscule in thier effect.

If the coach was aligned to minimum toe with a collapsed suspension, it may
be toed OUT at curb height too, just by this process.

Up front, the 2.5-3.0+ caster should be lots, slight changes in caster and
toe may help correct 'nibbling' which is usually a sign of dog tracking and
camber problems. If the steering box has a slightly too tight adjustment of
lash on center, or the idler arm or another steering part is 'sticky' they
can be hard to drive due to constant over-correction also.

Any axle toed out will certainly make your coach wander, you might sight
along each whel and see where it appears to be 'aimed' just by eyeball to
see if any stand out as incorrect- when aligning rear wheels it is
imperative you use the front hubs as the reference point for aiming them.

As far as settings go, radials are usually extremely forgiving and can mask
a lot of problems, but have some slightly different preferences to bias ply
tires as originally fitted to many coaches. Radials work very well when they
are made to bend;-)

I would think 1/4" total toe on each rear axle would not be too much
overall, and shouldnt wear tires particularly. Make sure the bearings aren't
loose too, that might drag a wheel, and alignment shops never check. On the
front, toe in should also work, but closer to zero is likely OK, maybe even
toed out a tiny amount. Works on the Eldorados anyhow;-)

For a quick test of which way (toed in or out) your alignments are
operating, just run the palm of your hand across the tread surface to see
which direction the saw-tooth effect has begun to occur, toe in feels like
drag pulling outwards on your hand, toe out is smoother pulling your hand
towards you. Ideally, they should all feel the same on each axle.

I will try to see if I can find a good illustration of the GMC suspension to
make a better guess at what might be going on-if anyone has one, please scan
a copy if you could!

Good Luck, and keep us posted on how things are going;-)

Regards

Brent
 
This is a follow up to the message posted below a few weeks ago. I had
the offset bushings installed and they increased the castor up to
2.5-3.0 deg. Unfortunately it didn't help the wig wag like I was sure
it ...
>>

When I had a front wheel alignment, the specified adjustments could not
be achieved because the ride height in front was too low and because a
ball joint had some wear. Those are now on my todo list.

Even with the rear wheels toe adjustment slightly out, I have much
improved steering with a tight gearbox.

Bill .... just back in town ...
'74 Glacier
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com