Towd MPG penalty

richshoop

New member
Apr 4, 2017
198
0
0
Using a 2001 Jeep Wrangler as a towd, what could I reasonably expect for a decrease in MPG?

----- Original Message -----

From: "John R. Lebetski"
To: "gmclist"
Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2017 4:28:21 PM
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Larger Engine Oil Filter

It think it's like this. The big block and small block take a different recommended filter. Then ,there is also a longer version of each of those for
HD service.
--
John Lebetski
Woodstock, IL
77 Eleganza II

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
 
If your running a standard ratio you can notice 3 mpg decrease
Should you have 3.70 you'll have only 1. mpg decreases
I get that. From our customers

> Using a 2001 Jeep Wrangler as a towd, what could I reasonably expect for a
> decrease in MPG?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: "John R. Lebetski"
> To: "gmclist"
> Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2017 4:28:21 PM
> Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Larger Engine Oil Filter
>
> It think it's like this. The big block and small block take a different
> recommended filter. Then ,there is also a longer version of each of those
> for
> HD service.
> --
> John Lebetski
> Woodstock, IL
> 77 Eleganza II
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
--
Jim Kanomata
Applied/GMC, Newark,CA
jimk
http://www.appliedgmc.com
1-800-752-7502
 
8 to 10 mpg
Depending on if you tow

> If your running a standard ratio you can notice 3 mpg decrease
> Should you have 3.70 you'll have only 1. mpg decreases
> I get that. From our customers
>

>
> > Using a 2001 Jeep Wrangler as a towd, what could I reasonably expect for
> a
> > decrease in MPG?
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >
> > From: "John R. Lebetski"
> > To: "gmclist"
> > Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2017 4:28:21 PM
> > Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Larger Engine Oil Filter
> >
> > It think it's like this. The big block and small block take a different
> > recommended filter. Then ,there is also a longer version of each of those
> > for
> > HD service.
> > --
> > John Lebetski
> > Woodstock, IL
> > 77 Eleganza II
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > GMCnet mailing list
> > Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> > http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > GMCnet mailing list
> > Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> > http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
> >
> --
> Jim Kanomata
> Applied/GMC, Newark,CA
> jimk
> http://www.appliedgmc.com
> 1-800-752-7502
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
--
Gene Fisher -- 74-23,77PB/ore/ca
“Give a man a fish; you have fed him for today --- give him a URL and
-------
http://bdub.net/gmcmotorhome.info/
Alternator Protection Cable
http://bdub.net/gmcmotorhome.info/APC.html
 
I got 10.2 MPG pulling Linda's 5000lbs Chevy Uplander lift van. With 87 Octane ethanol gas. 78 Royale 403 stock exh, carbureted, and a 3:70 FD. GVW of 17,000lbs. Pulling a car hauler with a car on it. I got 9.8 MPG with a GVW of15,000lbs. So the Uplander seems to have better air flow behind the GMC. With the 3:70 FD. My trans temps went down, and MPG's went up about 1.7 MPG's. That was with the burned GMC. Haven't calculated this 78 Royale 403, and the 3:70 FD yet. Bob Dunahugh