GMC Motorhome Digest V2 #444 / waterpumps 'n stuff

heinz wittenbecher

New member
Mar 1, 1998
1,470
0
0
> I vote with you Duane and also think that it is a myth.
>


>. I & many of our local club members have great
> >success using the standard Heavy TRW or AirTek water pump listed for Olds
> >455 w/air condition. Cost is about $60 w/lifetime warranty.



Pardon for my penny's worth here but I thought I'd jump in and add a bent
penny's worth re lifetime warranties.



Perhaps I'm reading some of these posts wrong but I get the impression that
lifetime warranty and quality are used or implied in conjunction to mean
that if a manufacturer gives a lifetime warranty it must be a quality item
he/she's selling us. In my opinion and experiences nothing could be further
from reality (remember it's JMHO).

Lifetime warranties are pure crock. The manufacturer simply gambles that
only a very small percentage will use the product beyond expiry (failure)
and it's much cheaper to give the odd consumer more of the same crap while
pocketing the profites from the garbage sold to the majority.

I would much rather pay a higher, yet fair, price for a piece of true
quality and have the knowledge that if a failure occurs it is indeed a
failure and not time of expiry reached.

Case in point... my recent purchase of a fanclutch with a lifetime
guarantee. Unfortunately it's life was less than 5000 miles, which in my
case was less than 3 weeks. Now granted, it could've just as easily lasted 3
years, as long as it would've taken me that long to put the 5000 miles on
it. I know that I would have no trouble to get a no cost replacement. After
all, NAPA stands behind what they sell and they truly do, by giving you
another one at no cost. Of course I'm not going to bother. I'm just mad at
myself for running the clutch for that long as I know better from previous
experiences... but it had been a while and time does heal old wounds or
apparently makes one forget old wounds.

Another one... I spent a hot afternoon in the California desert one summer
changing a waterpump by the side of the road. No fun for real, especially as
it was before fan-shroud update. It was absolutely no fun. I was extremely
grateful to one of my customers that came to the rescue with a waterpump and
helping hands. ( I'm still paying for that favor :-) One of the reasons I
now carry a spare waterpump along. Was the premature failure because the
rebuilder was saving a few bucks? Probably.

In my humble opinion there is absolutely no substitute for quality... after
all, isn't that why we mess with GMC's in the first place? There are no free
lunches. When you buy poor or questionable quality you simply postpone the
true and ultimate cost and usually when the bill finally comes in for the
difference between rapid-fire-mass-production and quality it is usually much
higher than paying for quality up front and that's even without allowance
for the inconvenience that's guaranteed to happen.

Now don't get me wrong guys and gals, I do appreciate the cost sensitive
threads that appear here now and again and also the comparisons that are
frequent, i.e. don't quit. Just because I like quality doesn't mean I don't
want best possible price for that quality.
Perhaps I'm just rambling because I'm still trying to justify paying 399
bucks for a waterpump vs 60 for a lifetime guarateed one :-)

All kidding aside though... many of us are DIY-GMC-Professionals, some by
choice, some due to mental state (me) and some due to some other
constraints. Is a 50% saving on parts at home vs a breakdown away from home
really a saving? Not in my opinion as at that time we just say fix it and
worry about adding to the mortgage after we get back home. Even for the
non-DIY's, do you not feel more comfortable with your regular mechanic vs
some on-the-road-middle-of-nowhere stranger that you know will charge you
more... and perhaps even more than that :-)

Of course the Black List will go a long ways towards preventing the latter.
We have to keep in mind that we have to treat our GMC a little kinder and
perhaps treat them to a little extra once in a while. It's not like our
car... chances are good that when our car breaks down we'll be resonably
close to home. When we travel in our GMC our chances will be just as good to
the contrary... we'll be a gazillion miles (it'll seem that far) from
home... frustrated, feeeling alone and deserted.

Sorry for the rambling, but I just want to reiterate that we all have to
make our own decisions and thanks to the gmcnet we can make those decisions
much better informed.

All I'm saying is to be sure to weigh price against cost, true cost, and
then feed your GMC as you see fit and with what you are comfortable with.

Happy GMC'ing. Thanks to the gmcnet we can all enjoy our GMC's to the best
of our ability. Thanks again Patrick.

Heinz

 
Heinz and everyone else,
This humble computer salesman and GMC owner wonders how do all the
other GMC owners survive that are not involved with the GMCnet. I for one
would be lost now if it were not for the GMCnet.

My neighbor, who is the original owner of a 1973 Canyon Lands and a DIY
parts changer and who has close ties to several of the original engineers of the

GMC, does not have a clue now about contemporary maintenance of his coach.
He now tells his GMC friends (who are not GMCnet members) to call me for
advice! He's had his GMC for almost 26 years and I've had mine for less then 10

months. How's that for getting high on the learning curve? All because of the
GMCnet!

And I feel like I have so much yet to learn and not much to share with what I
have
learned.

Richard Waters
'76 PB, Troy, MI
- ------



> >
>
> Happy GMC'ing. Thanks to the gmcnet we can all enjoy our GMC's to the best
> of our ability. Thanks again Patrick.
>
> Heinz
>
>
 
> I use to to think that the price of something equates to quality. I've
gone
> both ways and have had equal problems with quality in both cases.

I know what you mean Scott.
I too have been there, done that.
It sure would be nice if we could at least count on half of what we pay for
:-)

I'm going to leave the jury out on the WP. If it lasts until next overhaul
I'll be comfortable with the purchase. If not I'll really have to think
about making my next engine a Mondello. Guess we could call this a $400 test
of quality and integrity [g], and either way it may turn out to be a good
investment.

Heinz
 
Largest rebuilders in the US today is A-1 Cardone in Pennsylvannia.See their
web site http://www.cardoneonline.com/

>In a message dated 5/13/99 11:53:45 PM Eastern Daylight Time,

>
>> Perhaps I'm just rambling because I'm still trying to justify paying 399
>> bucks for a waterpump vs 60 for a lifetime guarateed one :-)
>
>Hi Heinz!
>
>I use to to think that the price of something equates to quality. I've gone
>both ways and have had equal problems with quality in both cases.
>Personally, now , I'd keep the extra savings of $339 and consider the water
>pump something that needs to be replaced when needed and carry a spare. With
>so many private labelers now who knows where these pumps are rebuilt or
>manufactured? It seems like someone made a huge profit somewhere!
>
>Scott
>
>
Tom & Marg Warner
Vernon Center NY
1976 palmbeach
"The beautiful Mohawk Vally"
 
Heinz, I agree with most everything in your wonderful
stream-of-consciousness ramble. The point of some of my recent posts on this
topic had more to do with GETTING that quality at a price that won't leave
you gripping your ankles and wondering why you're bleeding. I'm beginning
to wonder if perhaps one of us -- and I'll volunteer for the task -- ought
to construct a poll to compile some real-world, empirical FIELD data on the
performance/longevity of the various MAJOR/HIGHER COST components used on
these machines and, once and for all, slay ALL those myths to the extent one
can do that among so diverse and opinionated :-) a group.

Would anyone else find it helpful to see data such as this?

Exhaust manifold widget (as of 5/20/99)
Ranking No Reported Brand Model AVERAGE Miles of SATISFACTORY
SERVICE 1 150 Swartz 230 100K
2 76 Doofus 129A 55K
3 29 Schluter 76543 23K

Yes, QC and other elements of the process DO change over time. However, my
experience has been that most of the big guys usually hold the line and
offer fairly consistent product quality. That sort of data would allow us
to shop based on REAL WORLD information -- NOT MYTH. And there might be
some real surprises: Haven't we all sometimes found that the less costly
product beats the hell out of the higher priced unit? That would be good to
know BEFORE opening the old wallet and grabbing the ankles. Not to mention
those delightful 1,000 miles from home, desert road-side water pump change
outs, etc., etc....

I guess the next question is the BIGGIE: HOW MANY OF YOU WOULD BE WILLING
TO SUBMIT DATA (and no fibbing, guys!) TO THIS PROJECT? The polls would
come to you as a simple fill-in-the-blanks form for the item in question
asking for brand name, model number (if known) and miles you've had it in
SATISFACTORY service. And the larger the sample, the better smoothing of
the numerous inherent variables.

While their politics may suck, Consumer Union has kept ME from making costly
mistakes over the many years I've used them for the major buys around here.
Anybody want to try to apply the same concept to the GMC?

Dick (WANNABE MYTH-SLAYER) 75 PB in Atlanta

>
>> I vote with you Duane and also think that it is a myth.
>>
>
>
>>. I & many of our local club members have great
>> >success using the standard Heavy TRW or AirTek water pump listed for Olds
>> >455 w/air condition. Cost is about $60 w/lifetime warranty.
>
>
>
>Pardon for my penny's worth here but I thought I'd jump in and add a bent
>penny's worth re lifetime warranties.
>
>
>
>Perhaps I'm reading some of these posts wrong but I get the impression that
>lifetime warranty and quality are used or implied in conjunction to mean
>that if a manufacturer gives a lifetime warranty it must be a quality item
>he/she's selling us. In my opinion and experiences nothing could be further
>from reality (remember it's JMHO).
>
>Lifetime warranties are pure crock. The manufacturer simply gambles that
>only a very small percentage will use the product beyond expiry (failure)
>and it's much cheaper to give the odd consumer more of the same crap while
>pocketing the profites from the garbage sold to the majority.
>
>I would much rather pay a higher, yet fair, price for a piece of true
>quality and have the knowledge that if a failure occurs it is indeed a
>failure and not time of expiry reached.
>
>Case in point... my recent purchase of a fanclutch with a lifetime
>guarantee. Unfortunately it's life was less than 5000 miles, which in my
>case was less than 3 weeks. Now granted, it could've just as easily lasted 3
>years, as long as it would've taken me that long to put the 5000 miles on
>it. I know that I would have no trouble to get a no cost replacement. After
>all, NAPA stands behind what they sell and they truly do, by giving you
>another one at no cost. Of course I'm not going to bother. I'm just mad at
>myself for running the clutch for that long as I know better from previous
>experiences... but it had been a while and time does heal old wounds or
>apparently makes one forget old wounds.
>
>Another one... I spent a hot afternoon in the California desert one summer
>changing a waterpump by the side of the road. No fun for real, especially as
>it was before fan-shroud update. It was absolutely no fun. I was extremely
>grateful to one of my customers that came to the rescue with a waterpump and
>helping hands. ( I'm still paying for that favor :-) One of the reasons I
>now carry a spare waterpump along. Was the premature failure because the
>rebuilder was saving a few bucks? Probably.
>
>In my humble opinion there is absolutely no substitute for quality... after
>all, isn't that why we mess with GMC's in the first place? There are no free
>lunches. When you buy poor or questionable quality you simply postpone the
>true and ultimate cost and usually when the bill finally comes in for the
>difference between rapid-fire-mass-production and quality it is usually much
>higher than paying for quality up front and that's even without allowance
>for the inconvenience that's guaranteed to happen.
>
>Now don't get me wrong guys and gals, I do appreciate the cost sensitive
>threads that appear here now and again and also the comparisons that are
>frequent, i.e. don't quit. Just because I like quality doesn't mean I don't
>want best possible price for that quality.
>Perhaps I'm just rambling because I'm still trying to justify paying 399
>bucks for a waterpump vs 60 for a lifetime guarateed one :-)
>
>All kidding aside though... many of us are DIY-GMC-Professionals, some by
>choice, some due to mental state (me) and some due to some other
>constraints. Is a 50% saving on parts at home vs a breakdown away from home
>really a saving? Not in my opinion as at that time we just say fix it and
>worry about adding to the mortgage after we get back home. Even for the
>non-DIY's, do you not feel more comfortable with your regular mechanic vs
>some on-the-road-middle-of-nowhere stranger that you know will charge you
>more... and perhaps even more than that :-)
>
>Of course the Black List will go a long ways towards preventing the latter.
>We have to keep in mind that we have to treat our GMC a little kinder and
>perhaps treat them to a little extra once in a while. It's not like our
>car... chances are good that when our car breaks down we'll be resonably
>close to home. When we travel in our GMC our chances will be just as good to
>the contrary... we'll be a gazillion miles (it'll seem that far) from
>home... frustrated, feeeling alone and deserted.
>
>Sorry for the rambling, but I just want to reiterate that we all have to
>make our own decisions and thanks to the gmcnet we can make those decisions
>much better informed.
>
>All I'm saying is to be sure to weigh price against cost, true cost, and
>then feed your GMC as you see fit and with what you are comfortable with.
>
>Happy GMC'ing. Thanks to the gmcnet we can all enjoy our GMC's to the best
>of our ability. Thanks again Patrick.
>
>Heinz
>
>
>
>
 
> I guess the next question is the BIGGIE: HOW MANY OF YOU WOULD BE WILLING
> TO SUBMIT DATA (and no fibbing, guys!) TO THIS PROJECT? The polls would
> come to you as a simple fill-in-the-blanks form for the item in question
> asking for brand name, model number (if known) and miles you've had it in
> SATISFACTORY service. And the larger the sample, the better smoothing of
> the numerous inherent variables.

Great idea. Count me in.

Perhaps add place of purchase so that we can get a feeling for those
suppliers that take good care of us over the longer term so that we can take
care of them buy buying from them even items not on the hotlist.

Heinz
 
I'm in.

>> I guess the next question is the BIGGIE: HOW MANY OF YOU WOULD BE WILLING
>> TO SUBMIT DATA (and no fibbing, guys!) TO THIS PROJECT? The polls would
>> come to you as a simple fill-in-the-blanks form for the item in question
>> asking for brand name, model number (if known) and miles you've had it in
>> SATISFACTORY service. And the larger the sample, the better smoothing of
>> the numerous inherent variables.
>
>Great idea. Count me in.
>
>Perhaps add place of purchase so that we can get a feeling for those
>suppliers that take good care of us over the longer term so that we can take
>care of them buy buying from them even items not on the hotlist.
>
>Heinz
>
>
>
>
>
Tom & Marg Warner
Vernon Center NY
1976 palmbeach
"The beautiful Mohawk Vally"
 
I would do that.
Richard Waters

> > I guess the next question is the BIGGIE: HOW MANY OF YOU WOULD BE WILLING
> > TO SUBMIT DATA (and no fibbing, guys!) TO THIS PROJECT? The polls would
> > come to you as a simple fill-in-the-blanks form for the item in question
> > asking for brand name, model number (if known) and miles you've had it in
> > SATISFACTORY service. And the larger the sample, the better smoothing of
> > the numerous inherent variables.
>
 
Count me In.

Bob Morris
Jayhawk
74 Elganza SE
Cortland NY

- ----- Original Message -----
From: Tom Warner
To:
Sent: Friday, May 14, 1999 6:45 PM
Subject: Re: GMC: GMC Motorhome Digest V2 #444 / waterpumps 'n stuff

> I'm in.
>

> >> I guess the next question is the BIGGIE: HOW MANY OF YOU WOULD BE
WILLING
> >> TO SUBMIT DATA (and no fibbing, guys!) TO THIS PROJECT? The polls
would
> >> come to you as a simple fill-in-the-blanks form for the item in
question
> >> asking for brand name, model number (if known) and miles you've had it
in
> >> SATISFACTORY service. And the larger the sample, the better smoothing
of
> >> the numerous inherent variables.
> >
> >Great idea. Count me in.
> >
> >Perhaps add place of purchase so that we can get a feeling for those
> >suppliers that take good care of us over the longer term so that we can
take
> >care of them buy buying from them even items not on the hotlist.
> >
> >Heinz
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> Tom & Marg Warner
> Vernon Center NY
> 1976 palmbeach
> "The beautiful Mohawk Vally"
>
>