Dometic 320 toilet

I have installed a Dometic 320 in the Stretch. It's bathroom module is from a 78 Eleganza and the module is identical to my 77 Eleganza. The back of
the toilet just barely contacts the back wall of the module, but it fits & works fine. I recently removed the toilet to access plumbing under the
sink, so got a look at the point where the contact is. You can see that the toilet has touched the wall, but it has not worn thru the gelcoat in 3
years and 12000 miles. The toilet works fine and has been trouble free. Hope this helps, John
--
John Shutzbaugh, Vacaville, CA, ncserv;
77 Eleganza, bought it new, can't blame PO, and
78 Buskirk stretch, "What were we thinking?"
 
That does help, thank you. I see the 310 referenced a lot, and the Sealand, but not the 320. Pretty sure the 320 (or whatever number it was) is what
I had. It doesn't take up too much space in the bathroom, it's not a big room

> I have installed a Dometic 320 in the Stretch. It's bathroom module is from a 78 Eleganza and the module is identical to my 77 Eleganza. The
> back of the toilet just barely contacts the back wall of the module, but it fits & works fine. I recently removed the toilet to access plumbing
> under the sink, so got a look at the point where the contact is. You can see that the toilet has touched the wall, but it has not worn thru the
> gelcoat in 3 years and 12000 miles. The toilet works fine and has been trouble free. Hope this helps, John

--
1978 Kingsley
Putney VT
 
I put in a Sealand 510 about 9 years ago. I think it is virtually the same as the Dometic. It fit fine.
--
Carl Stouffer
'75 ex Palm Beach
Tucson, AZ.
Chuck Aulgur Reaction Arm Disc Brakes, Quadrabags, 3.70 LSD final drive, Lenzi knuckles/hubs, Dodge Truck 16" X 8" front wheels, Rear American Eagles,
Solar battery charging. GMCSJ and GMCMI member